Cutting it close: Rico Gathers

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,370
Reaction score
21,363
glimmerman said:
I think he was stashed. But that’s just my opinion. He was definitely hurt and I am glad they took no chances with bringing him back early. But they could have brought him in for sure.
Click to expand...

They *could* have brought him back for sure. But the point being, how many *other* players could they also have brought back, and which ones were the highest priority?

I think you can only bring 2 back. Were other players a higher priority? I recall some noise along those lines, but don't remember who we did bring back, who we might have been waiting on to bring back, etc.
 
glimmerman

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,672
Reaction score
30,371
buybuydandavis said:
Good point.

It's certainly an advantage from a cap perspective to keep guys by spending more money on them off the cap.
Click to expand...
Yeah I want to say we gave Rico close to 500k to stay on our PS. They don’t have to leave for other teams if they don’t want. But I understand why they leave, it gives them a chance on a 53. And a chance to start. But if it’s me and they pay me that money to stay and learn and train then I am staying. They have plans for Rico.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,370
Reaction score
21,363
Jumbo075 said:
Coin flip for me for the offense. But Scarbrough has LB size, and I think he's running 1st string on several of the Special Teams squads. That's likely the tie breaker.
Click to expand...

I didn't know about Bo on special teams. That definitely makes it more likely they keep Bo on the 53 over Darius, but I doubt that changes the calculations of other teams snapping up Bo on the waiver wire much.

I always wanted Darius at kickoff return. I like thicker kickoff returners, and he has serious straight line speed.
 
glimmerman

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,672
Reaction score
30,371
buybuydandavis said:
I didn't know about Bo on special teams. That definitely makes it more likely they keep Bo on the 53 over Darius, but I doubt that changes the calculations of other teams snapping up Bo on the waiver wire much.

I always wanted Darius at kickoff return. I like thicker kickoff returners, and he has serious straight line speed.
Click to expand...
I heard SJ say we are keeping perhaps more than 6 WR this year. Wondering where we are going to short.
 
glimmerman

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,672
Reaction score
30,371
buybuydandavis said:
They *could* have brought him back for sure. But the point being, how many *other* players could they also have brought back, and which ones were the highest priority?

I think you can only bring 2 back. Were other players a higher priority? I recall some noise along those lines, but don't remember who we did bring back, who we might have been waiting on to bring back, etc.
Click to expand...
Ok that makes more sense. I wasn’t aware you can only bring 2 back. May have been a issue there. I do think he has already made the team this year. If he shows out tonight with the backup QB then he is a shoe in. Will be going against starters tonight. Gives us a good barometer if he has his blocking assignments down.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,370
Reaction score
21,363
Jumbo075 said:
PS salaries also count against the CAP.
Click to expand...

Huh.

I thought it was only the top 51 players who counted, but apparently that's only during the offseason. That seems odd.
http://www.askthecommish.com/SalaryCap/Faq.aspx
Question 1.5
...Only the top 51 player salaries for a team count against the salary cap in the offseason. (Outstanding tenders apply.) During the season, all player salaries count toward the salary cap.​

I think I still like the tactic, though. Cheap way to keep players you like.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,370
Reaction score
21,363
glimmerman said:
I heard SJ say we are keeping perhaps more than 6 WR this year. Wondering where we are going to short.
Click to expand...

I'd probably go short at RB. Cut both Bo and Darius, and we probably get at least 1 to the PS. That's enough insurance.

Lots of other players just have more value to me.
 
glimmerman

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,672
Reaction score
30,371
buybuydandavis said:
I'd probably go short at RB. Cut both Bo and Darius, and we probably get at least 1 to the PS. That's enough insurance.

Lots of other players just have more value to me.
Click to expand...
Keep Elliot and Rod and FB? Can always shorten up on D-Line when Irving comes back also. We may actually have some trade value with a DE. We are heavy there.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,370
Reaction score
21,363
glimmerman said:
Yeah I want to say we gave Rico close to 500k to stay on our PS. They don’t have to leave for other teams if they don’t want. But I understand why they leave, it gives them a chance on a 53. And a chance to start. But if it’s me and they pay me that money to stay and learn and train then I am staying. They have plans for Rico.
Click to expand...

You may want to play, but it's easy to turn yourself into roster churn instead of a developmental player. Laurence Gibson turned us down and bolted to another PS after we cut him? He's been bouncing around practice squads ever since.

The guys who draft you have a vested interest in developing you. Go to another team, and you're a disposable warm body learning a new system.

I understand that you don't think you have a chance to start on our oline, but that's a good crew to learn from and develop with. And if you ever get to play, you've got guys around you who will help you look good.
 
FuzzyLumpkins

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
GenoT said:
Rico has yet to play a down of football against anything remotely resembling a starting NFL defense. His preseason-only game highlights have come against future supermarket stock-boys and 7-Eleven cashiers.

Unless that changes soon (?), he’ll remain on the bubble until final cuts. Now in his third year, the fact that he hasn’t been given an opportunity to play with the 1’s during even a single preseason game indicates that his issues are likely not of the physical variety.

The clock’s definitely ticking on Rico’s Cowboys career.
Click to expand...

He can only play what is put in front of him.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,370
Reaction score
21,363
waldoputty said:
would cut the 3rd qb but keep darius
thought bo is injured?
Click to expand...

White is an interesting one. He looked bad last time he played. Just too slow in processing. So will teams want him?

I read his story, and liked the possibilities. I don't want to lose him, but think based on his current play, it's hard to see teams lining up to sign him either.

White, Tapper, Rico, Darius, Schulz. Schulz and White are real draft picks, but I'd rather have the other guys, certainly for this year.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,370
Reaction score
21,363
glimmerman said:
Keep Elliot and Rod and FB? Can always shorten up on D-Line when Irving comes back also. We may actually have some trade value with a DE. We are heavy there.
Click to expand...

Between Olawale and Austin, we have more game day 3rd RB than we did when we kept Dunbar as our 3rd.

I don't see the need for a gameday 3rd just for special teams. Maybe if we like Jackson as our kick returner, but I see no evidence of that. Defenders are usually better special teamers.
 
Silverstar

Silverstar

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,945
Reaction score
3,070
Rico is our leading receiver with 8 catches for 71 yards this preseason.

I'm sure he'll add to that on Thursday.
 
ghst187

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,722
Reaction score
11,572
We have no TEs with his potential on our roster. They are all JAGs. Rico is the only one capable of making a big play here and there. Obviously he needs to clean up his game but I want him running routes in the red zone as beginning spot duties. After last nights debacle, our talent is a lot thinner than I think we realized and TE is an important position in our offense. If our coaches can’t figure out how to get Rico on the field I think it probably shows another example of why we’ve been mediocre for so long and other brand new coaches can turn teams around in a year or two. Imagination....innovation....less clapping
 
Frozen700

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,512
Reaction score
6,477
ghst187 said:
We have no TEs with his potential on our roster. They are all JAGs. Rico is the only one capable of making a big play here and there. Obviously he needs to clean up his game but I want him running routes in the red zone as beginning spot duties. After last nights debacle, our talent is a lot thinner than I think we realized and TE is an important position in our offense. If our coaches can’t figure out how to get Rico on the field I think it probably shows another example of why we’ve been mediocre for so long and other brand new coaches can turn teams around in a year or two. Imagination....innovation....less clapping
Click to expand...

Agreed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top