News: ST: Cowboys coach Jason Garrett had fun, but no surprise NFC struggled to score in Pro Bowl

Clove · Jan 28, 2019

Roadtrip635 said:
The NFC gave up 7 sacks and there isn't even any blitzing allowed.

Because all of Garrett's plays, except the short stuff, takes to long to materialize.

Runwildboys · Jan 28, 2019

Roadtrip635 said:
The NFC gave up 7 sacks and there isn't even any blitzing allowed.

Did you see the Eagles OL? On every play he'd block once, then put his hands down and let the defensive player come through. I doubt the coaches taught him that.

ESisback · Jan 28, 2019

Runwildboys said:
It was a pointless, effortless game in which nobody cared about anything but having fun. One week to prepare a bunch of guys who don't play together, for a game they don't care about, with officials who blow the whistle as soon as the ball carrier is touched.

Exactly.

buybuydandavis · Jan 28, 2019

America's Cowboy said:
BBDD...

Did you forget the wide open bomb that Amari dropped from Dak for what should have been an easy TD when it hit him square on his facemask?

Making another Cowboy instrumental in the failure is supposed to make me feel good how?

buybuydandavis · Jan 28, 2019

Roadtrip635 said:
The NFC gave up 7 sacks and there isn't even any blitzing allowed.

But I bet they "battled".

Roadtrip635 · Jan 28, 2019

buybuydandavis said:
But I bet they "battled".

Did Garrett give a post game presser? It would have gone something like this "I really liked what I saw out there today, thought we battled until the end. This team showed a lot of effort and fight....."

DandyDon52 · Jan 28, 2019

kevm3 said:
Because it's a pattern and it pretty much is a foreshadowing of what's to come if we stick with Garrett and Moore. We've heard countless times how preseason didn't matter and how they only had the vanilla plays out there only for preseason to foreshadow what was going to happen during the real season. If not for that Dak touchdown, Garrett would have made history again with an NFC shutout. We've already seen 10 years of the same story.

I was hoping he would make history lol, and Kellen was play caller, had a 1st and goal and could not score lol.
Witten also said it was jason garretts system, which means linehan had to work with JG's system and playbook.

Sevenup3000 · Jan 28, 2019

buybuydandavis said:
Making another Cowboy instrumental in the failure is supposed to make me feel good how?

You are trying way too hard. You quickly point out 4/11 line about YOUR DALLAS COWBOY QB...yet when someone points out to you that a WR that plays for Dallas drops a wide-open pass...

Suddenly you want to become defensive about Dallas players.

If you don't like Dak, may I suggest go rooting for the Eagles? I hear Wentz may be back next year.

buybuydandavis · Jan 28, 2019

Sevenup3000 said:
You are trying way too hard. You quickly point out 4/11 line about YOUR DALLAS COWBOY QB...yet when someone points out to you that a WR that plays for Dallas drops a wide-open pass...

Suddenly you want to become defensive about Dallas players.

If you don't like Dak, may I suggest go rooting for the Eagles? I hear Wentz may be back next year.

Lay off the shrooms.

blumayne38 · Jan 28, 2019

Furboy said:

Fire407 · Jan 28, 2019

Ever since the Texans game you can bet Garrett will go for it on 4th and short every time now.

CowboysExchange · Jan 28, 2019

The NFL wouldn't allow Jerry to wear a headset and communicate with Garrett. Lol

According to Jerry they didn't have the right cleats again this week. Lmao

On another note their equipment manager gets promoted to OC for the pro bowl game.

Boyz981 · Jan 28, 2019

LOL.... people grasping at straws in the pro bowl!

OmerV · Jan 28, 2019

Clove said:
Because all of Garrett's plays, except the short stuff, takes to long to materialize.

It takes longer to run a 20 yard route when Garrett is the coach than when someone else is the coach?

It appeared to me the AFC was actually making an effort to rush the passer against O-Lineman who were barely going through the motions. Everyone is told not to actually hit anyone and risk injury, and the AFC D-Line took advantage of that.

nobody · Jan 28, 2019

America's Cowboy said:
Good one, FB!

There's a line in there that EVERYONE should say to Stephen Jones. "Don't get cheap on me, Stephen" Now, it's good when he gets cheap sometimes, but there's such a thing as overkill.

Irvin88_4life · Jan 28, 2019

buybuydandavis said:
"Prescott, who completed 4 of 11 passes for 48 yards"

And with his own coaching staff.
Sad.

To be fair though Dak hit guys with catchable balls. He only got 2 drives and looked better than both Wilson and Trubisky. All that being said, in a game where defenses aren't trying too hard...... Unless you are Jamal Adams..... There is no reason why they could only get 7 points.

Irvin88_4life · Jan 28, 2019

Roadtrip635 said:
The NFC gave up 7 sacks and there isn't even any blitzing allowed.

Lane Johnson was moving to the side and letting guys run free. The lack of effort was terrible, at least stay in front of the guy

RustyBourneHorse · Jan 28, 2019

America's Cowboy said:
Good one, FB!

Thank you

RustyBourneHorse · Jan 28, 2019

blumayne38 said:

Thanks

ItzKelz · Jan 28, 2019

kevm3 said:
Because it's a pattern and it pretty much is a foreshadowing of what's to come if we stick with Garrett and Moore. We've heard countless times how preseason didn't matter and how they only had the vanilla plays out there only for preseason to foreshadow what was going to happen during the real season. If not for that Dak touchdown, Garrett would have made history again with an NFC shutout. We've already seen 10 years of the same story.

It was a freaking probowl game. Cowboys fan have to be the most gullible.....

News: ST: Cowboys coach Jason Garrett had fun, but no surprise NFC struggled to score in Pro Bowl

Shrinkage

Confused about stuff

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member