How have we gotten to this again?

Captain43Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,317
Reaction score
7,578
First off the Cards aren't going to trade the 10th pick in last year's draft for a 2nd or 3rd rnd pick. That's just fan wannabe GM talk. Second counting the 4th rnd pick used to get Prescott you now say use another pick that the cards wouldn't accept to get a QB who in 13 starts threw more picks - 14 than TD's - 11 and a passer rating of 66.7 as a rookie yet Prescott numbers were TD's - 23, picks - 4, passer rating 104.9 and a Pro Bowl appearance as a rookie. Third, more fan wannabe GM thinking that a team will give up their #1 for a 2nd rnd pick, only in fairy tales. Lastly the only way a team get's into the top in the draft is by having a very bad record or by trading away one or more of the teams best players for that pick and then they will do poorly and be in the top 10 anyways. I'm so glad you actually have nothing to do with the Cowboys front office.
.
You sound like a know it all. What front office do you work for? Josh Rosen did have a shaky rookie year, but he didn’t get much help at all. All QB’s need talent around them to be successful, especially rookies. See Dak’s rookie year. I think Rosen has a good chance to be a very good NFL QB.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,901
Reaction score
16,588
The problem with all the Dak hand wringing is that it assumes its easy to find a replacement when in actually it is really hard.We were almost ready to Manziel,Lynch and connor freaking Cook and drafted Dak as a consolation to be a backup QB.We are not a good QB scouting team and every QB we have drafted since Romo and before Dak have been TERRIBLE.I dont trust this FO to even find a comparable QB in the draft unless they use a high draft pick and we are not going to sucl so much to get draft so high.
 

superonyx

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,390
Reaction score
15,696
Touchy?

Fiction?

Afraid to be 'challenged?

Because I do not feel compelled to post like you want me to?

Oh my..

you are new to social media, huh?

:laugh:
Are you new to debates?

The shame is that you make a few good points but in an effort to explain your reasoning you start making up fictional facts which causes even people who agree with your overall premise to separate themselves from your rant.

Adding Romo’s contract only weakened your arguments logic. Then pretending Dak winning a playoff game doesn’t matter didn’t help. Them blaming him for the loss in GB where he outplayed Rodgers just took you down into a lonely place where reality doesn’t like to exist.

I’m not trying to be mean and I think you are a cool dude with good posts in general. But you went a little off the rails on this one.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
:rolleyes:
So say a QB like Drew Brees who it took him until his TENTH season before winning a Super Bowl should have been winning them every year or gone to more just because the Saints had him? Last time I checked there's 11 players on offense and 11 players on defense and 11 players on special teams that All have to do their jobs for teams to succeed, not just the QB. Speaking of the other players how about Prescott's 2nd season when Bryant LEAD THE LEAGUE IN DROPS. as far as the Rams game in the playoffs last season Prescott didn't lose that game the defense did allowing TWO Ram RB's to rush for OVER 100 yards EACH. Again it was the defense that lost the Packers game not Prescott. Also so now Eric Mangini is the be all end all expert? The same guy as a head coach who has a losing record? Stop the presses, Eric Mangini has spoken.
.
You don't like Mangini?

Who do you like?

I will try listening to him.

Seriously..

I am not looking to piss anybody off.

This is just what I think right now.

What I do not like is the way this team in the last decade keeps trying to reinvent it's QB from bargain bin players and trying to make them as found gold.

The hype train gets too much at times.

Sorry if it does not fit your narrative.

I still read your posts..

:eek:
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
Blind luck.

This is true.

When you look at any real success for this franchise..

it always was with high drafted QBs..

Meredith

Morton

Staubach

Aikman

Lesser lights like White, Romo and DAK not so much.

Just saying.

Now go back and look at the rest of those teams with the high drafted QB's. Aikman was one of the triplets had Emmitt and Irvin and and a very good defense. Staubach had Drew Pearson and Tony Dorsett. and the flex defense. Other than what he did in the MNF booth just what did Don Meridith do. He was funny, oh ya lost the Ice Bowl with zero TD's and a pick. Now White took the Cowboys to THREE straight NFC championship games. It's time you realize that it take MUCH more than just a QB to win Super Bowls.
.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
Are you new to debates?

The shame is that you make a few good points but in an effort to explain your reasoning you start making up fictional facts which causes even people who agree with your overall premise to separate themselves from your rant.

Adding Romo’s contract only weakened your arguments logic. Then pretending Dak winning a playoff game doesn’t matter didn’t help. Them blaming him for the loss in GB where he outplayed Rodgers just took you down into a lonely place where reality doesn’t like to exist.

I’m not trying to be mean and I think you are a cool dude with good posts in general. But you went a little off the rails on this one.
We will see.

Time will tell.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
Now go back and look at the rest of those teams with the high drafted QB's. Aikman was one of the triplets had Emmitt and Irvin and and a very good defense. Staubach had Drew Pearson and Tony Dorsett. and the flex defense. Other than what he did in the MNF booth just what did Don Meridith do. He was funny, oh ya lost the Ice Bowl with zero TD's and a pick. Now White took the Cowboys to THREE straight NFC championship games. It's time you realize that it take MUCH more than just a QB to win Super Bowls.
.
Yawn..
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,791
Reaction score
36,310
I would rather use the majority of the cap to keep the offensive line and defensive line elite and let the chips fall where they may by going with bus driver QBs on rookie contracts.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
:rolleyes:
You don't like Mangini?

Who do you like?

I will try listening to him.

Seriously..

I am not looking to piss anybody off.

This is just what I think right now.

What I do not like is the way this team in the last decade keeps trying to reinvent it's QB from bargain bin players and trying to make them as found gold.

The hype train gets too much at times.

Sorry if it does not fit your narrative.

I still read your posts..

:eek:


Try looking at history. Bargain basement QB's. Brady - 6th rnd pick. Starr taken in the last rnd, 13th. Kurt Warner like Romo undrafted. HOF Steve Young didn't go until the supplementary draft. Mark Rypien taken in the 6th rnd. Joe Montana last player taken in the 3rd rnd. Joe Theismann taken in the 4th rnd. and lastly one of your so called high draft picks, Roger Staubach drafted in the 10th rnd. What does all of these QB's have in common? They all won Super Bowls. Where a player is drafted has ZERO to do with what kind of career they may have. Again thank God you have nothing to do with the Cowboys front office.
.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
You sound like a know it all. What front office do you work for? Josh Rosen did have a shaky rookie year, but he didn’t get much help at all. All QB’s need talent around them to be successful, especially rookies. See Dak’s rookie year. I think Rosen has a good chance to be a very good NFL QB.

It's funny, not ha ha funny, that the Cards are trying to unload Rosen with no takers thus far. So I guess you're a better judge of talent than professional coaches huh? If he had such a bright future the Cards wouldn't be trying to trade him to pick another rookie QB in this draft.
.
 

CouchCoach

Staff member
Messages
41,122
Reaction score
74,902
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
What are they gonna wait for? If he doesn't improve but stays the same, what are the options? Sell out the entire draft, if that were even possible, to try and get the 1st pick to get Tua?

I was in that "wait and see" camp but realized it really doesn't matter as they're going forward with him. They've already announced he's the Man and established their own deadline for getting this done. They must feel this will save some cap in the long run because he will be more amenable because they're rewarding him now instead of making him wait a year.

Redball, I get it but in moving forward now they instill some stability within the team. HC in a contract year, first time OC and the QB in a contract year are a lot for a team to handle. The focal point of the media is going to be on the future of the HC, make them keep it that way by not giving them other targets like the QB.
 

CouchCoach

Staff member
Messages
41,122
Reaction score
74,902
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's funny, not ha ha funny, that the Cards are trying to unload Rosen with no takers thus far. So I guess you're a better judge of talent than professional coaches huh? If he had such a bright future the Cards wouldn't be trying to trade him to pick another rookie QB in this draft.
.
Don't know what they're asking for him but Rosen is being judged just as Goff was after his rook season. I've watched TT teams coached by Klingsbury and Rosen does not look like a fit. But I wouldn't judge him based off that. Most rookie starting QB's that are 1st rounders have tough seasons.

Whether he's as good as or better than Prescott is debatable at this point. But I would like to have seen quite a few rookie QB's dropped into the offense he took over and see how they'd performed.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
Try looking at history. Bargain basement QB's. Brady - 6th rnd pick. Starr taken in the last rnd, 13th. Kurt Warner like Romo undrafted. HOF Steve Young didn't go until the supplementary draft. Mark Rypien taken in the 6th rnd. Joe Montana last player taken in the 3rd rnd. Joe Theismann taken in the 4th rnd. and lastly one of your so called high draft picks, Roger Staubach drafted in the 10th rnd. What does all of these QB's have in common? They all won Super Bowls. Where a player is drafted has ZERO to do with what kind of career they may have. Again thank God you have nothing to do with the Cowboys front office.
.
Staubach as we know was in the Navy.

He would have been the first player drafted if he was not in the service.

Thank goodness he was for us.

The rest of your list is valid..

good research.

But my points for this team remain unchanged.

Our best QBs were drafted high and lasted the longest.

DAK is an anomaly.

His biggest asset is not his arm or his legs.

It's being drafted by. a team that was building a team for Romo to make one final run at a SB.

Luck is DAKs biggest plus.

If he was with Arizona..or Chicago..

he would be on the bench.

So while I root for DAK..

I look at it as opportunity + timing for him.

Zeke is the big wheel in our machine.

DAK needs to just minimize his errors and we be competitive.

Now is he worth $25+ mil..?

Hmmmmm...
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,916
Reaction score
22,440
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
They lied when they said they couldn't sign x player. Cause they did sign Carr for 50 mil and gave crawford 10 million a year. So we had highly paid players they didn't work out.
Carr was in 2013. He’s not relevant to how the team is handling business today. Even Crawford was 4 years ago (and admittedly a head scratcher). Besides, they never said they “couldn’t” sign a player, they said wouldn’t sign players they felt would put them in a bind with the salary cap.
 

jjktkk

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,283
Reaction score
1,363
I understand.

But winning is the bottom line.

Romo, as much as I liked him over Bledsoe..

was too quickly annointed our next savior QB.

The organization never challenged Romo with competition for his job.

Then they gave him his big contract and that is where things got complicated.

We won only sporadically.

If we give DAK the big contract..

I can see this forum going crazy if we go 3-5 again.

DAK is going to be on a very short leash of expectation.

There will be little patience if he stumbles.

If he continues missing wide open receiver for TDs or throws balls in the ground like last year or continues to hold the ball for sacks..

and we have no backup to fall back on..

Katy bar the door.
When a organization deems a player a franchise QB, you're not going to bring in competition to challenge him. That would be ludicrous. I personally don't know with if Dak is the guy, but I'm on board with the Cowboys decision to roll with Dak for the foreseeable future.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,916
Reaction score
22,440
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The problem with all the Dak hand wringing is that it assumes its easy to find a replacement when in actually it is really hard.We were almost ready to Manziel,Lynch and connor freaking Cook and drafted Dak as a consolation to be a backup QB.We are not a good QB scouting team and every QB we have drafted since Romo and before Dak have been TERRIBLE.I dont trust this FO to even find a comparable QB in the draft unless they use a high draft pick and we are not going to sucl so much to get draft so high.

They really haven’t tried to draft starting QBs, and that’s the issue more than a problem with evaluation. Before Dak it was a 3rd round project who came from a running system in college in McGee, and after was Mike White in the 5th round. With very few exceptions, other teams aren’t making guys like that work either. 1 out of 3 really isn’t bad when the 3 are a 3rd, 4th and 5th rounder. The last QB the Cowboys drafted before that was Steve Walsh in the 1989 supplemental draft.
 

cern

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,900
Reaction score
21,050
We are only 3 years removed from having given Romo an obscene contract and then Dez and both contracts have just come off our books after years of killing our cap.

Both players could not live up to their contracts and won very little.

We were unable to resign players and lost players left and right and finally it all hit the fan at 6-10.

Now we are about to start the whole process again only with a QB who has had only 3 years in the NFL to prove himself as deserving in DAK.

Romo had 4 years before he became a starter then it was another 2 years before we gave him the big contract.

6 years of knowing what we had and still it blew up on us.

Here we are again looking at investing in another bargain player in Dak like Romo was and it took 10 years to move on from it.

I just really think this franchise has lost its mind if they jump off the deep end with DAK.

And I like him but he has some skill sets still absent.

Before taking another poison pill contract in the hopes of succeeding..

let DAK win something more than a preliminary playoff game.

He does not have to be re-signed yet.

He has another year on his deal.

So what if it costs more to sign him later.?

If that happens and he wins..

we pay him or not.

If not..we are not going to have a problem taking his money and signing a QB in FA that can help us or if we were really wise..

draft another DAK and start getting him ready going forward now.

We could use our #2 pick and draft somebody and let Rush and White go.

Either way we win.

This is what the Patriots would do.

They draft a Garofalo and when they knew Brady was going to be staying..

they traded him.

But they did not get into a crisis over a single player.

Just for once I would like to play with a winning hand.

I know some here will think this is crazy..but not to me.

If this all goes to Hades and Garrett gets fired after this year..

at least the new coach will not be saddled with a hopeless salary cap situation to start over with.

Slow it down Stephen, Jerry and company.

Take your time.

Comments?
don't understand the logic in saying we're about to overpay another qb, comparing his upcoming deal to tony's and that of dez, and then saying don't sign him now, what difference does it make if it costs more later. and if we don't sign him, what are your suggestions for the next qb of the cowboys?
 

Boyz981

Well-Known Member
Messages
765
Reaction score
783
I guess I do not understand your comment.

You mean just rushing ahead without validation is OK?

We have seen DAK in two playoff games where his play could not get the win..Packers and Rams.

We have seen during Zeke's suspension that DAK was not good enough to succeed on his play alone.

Coach Eric Mangini in an interview on First Things First a few months back said about DAK that a player like him that requires constantly adding high price players around him to win is a caution.

He said a lot of other things about us that are very true.



At some point DAK has to prove he is the difference maker..

not a expensive complimentary piece.

That is the nature of the position at the highest levels.

We have to be careful.


You didn't just say that?? Daks play in the 2 playoff games! He didn't lose them games! LOL
 
Top