If Dak were playing for a Division Rival would you hate to play them?

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,960
I really like how you follow me around like a lost puppy. Yes, McCoy is among tons of scrubs in this league with better passing ability than Dak. I will make sure to remind you of this every week of the season. I am guilty of not proofreading my post and I will sometimes go with the word suggested by my IPhone from my useage history. It happens. You got me. Oh, what will I do now?
That’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Your lack of basic education is nothing compared to your sheer stupidity whenever you barf out a football opinion.

You said the Cowboys would have a “VERY GOOD CHANCE” of easily replacing Dak, Zeke and Amari with draft picks.

Any idiot who knows ANYTHING about football would laugh at such a statement.

As if the draft has a 90% success rate, you clown.

“DURR ANY college prospect can pass better than Dak!”

“Colt McCoy is a better passer than Dak! Forget the actual results!”

THESE ARE THINGS YOU HAVE ACTUALLY SAID. Recently too.

You’re such an inferior being.
:lmao2:
 

Cmac

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,159
Reaction score
8,147
The NFL only considers a ball that is considered as catchable and not caught as a drop. Your idea of low or behind are not counted as drops. Again when receivers weren't dropping balls Prescott had a impressive passer rating.
.
See....I'm talking about Dak hoisting in uncatchable areas....at times. Are we going to overlook that if we're being fair? I'm sure he's worked on that,....now we'll see starting Sunday.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,052
Reaction score
12,026
Yes, he’d drive me crazy! I’ve always hated when the Cowboys finally play good coverage or generate a pass rush, only to see a damn mobile QB pull it down and make first downs....ugh.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,530
Reaction score
17,890
Thanks to ItzKelz for the idea I thought this could make for an interesting topic.

Lets just say whatever team he goes to we swap with their starter. Would you feel at a disadvantage or would you feel like we all do now and can beat any team in our division?

*flame suit activated*
as much as I would hate to play wentz…..no difference.
 

Brax

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,489
Reaction score
7,225
It’s wonderful that you think that team could have gone 8-8. But the reality is, they didn’t.


I’m not coming from any side. I’ve never once said that the QB is carrying the offense. Perhaps you shouldn’t attribute arguments to people, that they aren’t making. I actually often say that it takes an entire team to win. I also frequently argue against the trope people spread around about finding QB’s who can “carry a team”

And there are plenty of people saying that you can just go out and easily find a QB to replace Dak and not skip a beat.

That is fools gold IMO.
That 4-12 team went 12-4 in 2014 then in 2016 added a elite RB named Zeke so get your history correct. Dak jumped on Zekes back and the rest is history. Dak is a good QB who was in effect a 5th round choice who was not even on Jerry's radar. Dallas got lucky with Dak but he really started with a great team and not many get to start that way. The offense has every year scored less points with Dak at QB a trend that needs to stop. There is no option so Dak will the DC QB for the foreseeable future but to make him out to be great at this stage is just plain wishful thinking. JJ paid Zeke for one reason only he knows Dak cannot shoulder the load and win games on his QB talent without Zeke and Zeke new it also.
 

bodi

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,676
Reaction score
3,134
no i do what indy did was man to man coverage

and stop Zeke with 132 yards from scrimmage

Dak Prescott completed 61.5 percent of his passes for 206 yards but threw one interception for a 64.7 rating
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,865
Reaction score
58,439
Thanks to ItzKelz for the idea I thought this could make for an interesting topic.

Lets just say whatever team he goes to we swap with their starter. Would you feel at a disadvantage or would you feel like we all do now and can beat any team in our division?

*flame suit activated*
Dak is one of the easiest quarterbacks to prepare for in the NFL.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
I really like how you follow me around like a lost puppy. Yes, McCoy is among tons of scrubs in this league with better passing ability than Dak. I will make sure to remind you of this every week of the season. I am guilty of not proofreading my post and I will sometimes go with the word suggested by my IPhone from my useage history. It happens. You got me. Oh, what will I do now?

Having watched McCoy since his college career at UT, it is widely known that McCoy has a just barely adequate arm for the NFL. He just like Prescott spent most of his snaps in college in the shotgun formation and took very few from under center. Like Prescott who got his chance to start because of injury to the starter, McCoy when given the same opportunity could not keep his starting job once the real starter was available.

Now I really liked McCoy while he was at UT, but if you honestly think McCoy is a better QB than Prescott it calls into question if you know anything about QB's at all and can make a rational decision on their abilities.
.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
See....I'm talking about Dak hoisting in uncatchable areas....at times. Are we going to overlook that if we're being fair? I'm sure he's worked on that,....now we'll see starting Sunday.

I find it funny, not ha ha funny, that those that keep harping on errant throws by Prescott as if he's the ONLY starting NFL QB in their first couple of seasons that has had errant throws. Some of the most accomplished QB's in the league today STILL on occasions throw errant balls and did more often earlier in their career but got better as their careers progressed. It's a little tiring to see people here constantly comparing Prescott to QB's with 6-10 years experience, time to have become the QB's they are today. Example, early in Rodger's career when he was still a backup for Favre, every time he got in 2 things happened, First he made some bad throws and then he got injured. Head coach McCarthy had said in practice he threw betterl but there were many sports people that questioned when Favre was through would Rodgers stay healthy and if he did would he develop some accuracy. He did get the accuracy thing down and for the first few seasons as a starter didn't get injured but time has caught up to him on the injury thing.
.
 

shabazz

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,746
Reaction score
30,928
McNabb was 10 times the QB Dak is....please don't insult the game of football.....

And man, that Dude could really swing his hips. Men! Men! Men!

hqdefault.jpg
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
Having watched McCoy since his college career at UT, it is widely known that McCoy has a just barely adequate arm for the NFL. He just like Prescott spent most of his snaps in college in the shotgun formation and took very few from under center. Like Prescott who got his chance to start because of injury to the starter, McCoy when given the same opportunity could not keep his starting job once the real starter was available.

Now I really liked McCoy while he was at UT, but if you honestly think McCoy is a better QB than Prescott it calls into question if you know anything about QB's at all and can make a rational decision on their abilities.
.
I think there is a number of QBs that could run this offense just as good if not better than Dak. Very few QBs have ever played surrounded by the talent that Dallas currently has. It is not just pure physical talent needed, but the ability to throw accurately and have the pocket awareness to get rid of the ball out without being sacked or fumbling the ball which happened quite often last year.
 

RoyalCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
812
Reaction score
1,356
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
No. For one I didn't hate to play against anyone but I would love and embrace the challenge. Played linebacker for 9 years, I loved to play against dual-threat QB's. They made me better. I can care less about your outlook on Dak, he is a winner and it would be a personal challenge and an absolute blast to play against him if I were a pro LB.
 

gjkoeppen

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,703
Reaction score
3,327
I think there is a number of QBs that could run this offense just as good if not better than Dak. Very few QBs have ever played surrounded by the talent that Dallas currently has. It is not just pure physical talent needed, but the ability to throw accurately and have the pocket awareness to get rid of the ball out without being sacked or fumbling the ball which happened quite often last year.

A couple of things. Prescott as a rookie had a passer rating of 104.9. Pretty tough to get that if he was as inaccurate as you're trying to paint him. Now his numbers dropped in 2017 but the number of drops by Bryant and Beasley also went up. Bryant to the tune of leading the league. The number of sacks and fumbles dropped dramatically last season once Cooper got here so you really have nothing. I see you didn't mention McCoy again probably because even you saw how ridiculous it is to say McCoy is better than Prescott.
.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
36,392
Reaction score
16,983
Thanks to ItzKelz for the idea I thought this could make for an interesting topic.

Lets just say whatever team he goes to we swap with their starter. Would you feel at a disadvantage or would you feel like we all do now and can beat any team in our division?

*flame suit activated*
Good call on the flame suit.

Whoever our QB is, if playing against Dak I'd stack the line and play Dak man on man. His (for now) short term game and his long-ball inaccuracy would give my defense a definite edge.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
36,392
Reaction score
16,983
Thanks to ItzKelz for the idea I thought this could make for an interesting topic.

Lets just say whatever team he goes to we swap with their starter. Would you feel at a disadvantage or would you feel like we all do now and can beat any team in our division?

*flame suit activated*
You and @ItzKelz are such good thinkers.
 
Last edited:

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,663
Reaction score
60,649
That 4-12 team went 12-4 in 2014 then in 2016 added a elite RB named Zeke so get your history correct. Dak jumped on Zekes back and the rest is history. Dak is a good QB who was in effect a 5th round choice who was not even on Jerry's radar. Dallas got lucky with Dak but he really started with a great team and not many get to start that way. The offense has every year scored less points with Dak at QB a trend that needs to stop. There is no option so Dak will the DC QB for the foreseeable future but to make him out to be great at this stage is just plain wishful thinking. JJ paid Zeke for one reason only he knows Dak cannot shoulder the load and win games on his QB talent without Zeke and Zeke new it also.

They didn’t go 8-8 in 2015. They went 4-12. Like I said. I know my history.

If you think Adding Zeke is the only reason a 4-12 team went to 13-3 that’s great. But that’s foolish.

It’s also funny that the team had a better record in 2016 than they did in 2014. Despite the 2014 team having a running back JUST as productive as 2016 Zeke but with Romo as QB instead.

I also never said Dak is great as of now.

And stop with the great supporting cast stuff. Yes he had Zeke. The receiving Corp in 2016 was really nothing that special though. Let’s be honest. Dez was hurt part of the season. Witten was old. Williams
And Butler are out of the league now, that’s how good they are. Beasley is a good slot receiver.

The cowboys receiving Corp/TE play was average that season.
 
Top