Would Romo have us at 5-0?

cern · Oct 8, 2019

tyke1doe said:
Romo has been gone for four years. Why are we even entertaining this question?

let him enjoy golfing and broadcasting. broken bones heal, but the glitch is forever.

IheartRomo · Oct 8, 2019

Would Joe Montana have this team at 5-0? How about Babe Ruth or Winston Churchill? :facepalm:

What is the point of a thread like this?

Beast_from_East · Oct 8, 2019

Irvin88_4life said:
Garrett also never started a season 3-0 and that includes when Romo was QB

Well when you start the season off playing the three worst teams in the league, kinda hard not to go 3-0

When we play a team that is not winless, kinda a different story, huh.

Beast_from_East · Oct 8, 2019

Eddie said:
How many Super Bowls did Romo bring us??

I'm just asking for a friend.

Same number Garrett has racked up.

LetsBeReal · Oct 9, 2019

cowboybish said:
So open for debate. Would Romo in his prime have us at 5-0 with this current team?

Hell yea. Damn near any competent qb would

Jeffkills · Oct 9, 2019

I don’t know, but he wouldn’t have thrown 3 picks last Sunday....

Remember when he and TO stomped out the Pack in week 13 in 07?

Come on, Dak... Speed it up, son....

buybuydandavis · Oct 9, 2019

Irvin88_4life said:
Than it's absurd to blame Dak for any loss but yet here we are

Dak has yet to have a season as good as Romo's 2014, or a playoff game as good as Romo's against GB in 2014.

Irvin88_4life · Oct 9, 2019

buybuydandavis said:
Dak has yet to have a season as good as Romo's 2014, or a playoff game as good as Romo's against GB in 2014.

Haha you think 191 yards and 2 TDs are better than what Dak has done in the playoffs....... Stop it, you are starting to look silly.

KJJ · Oct 9, 2019

PAPPYDOG said:
With this team around him......YES!

With this defense Romo would have twice as many INT’s as Dak. Every time we get behind he would be forcing throws into coverage. It’s laughable to think we’re losing because of Dak and Romo would have us 5-0. Romo never had the kind of production after the first 5 games that Dak has had this season.

KJJ · Oct 9, 2019

Dak has had two 400+ yard games and just over 1600 yards with 11 TDs and a passer rating of 106.0 after the first 5 games. Anyone thinks Romo would have done better than that is kidding themselves. The problem isn’t our QB! Dak is having to pretty much carry the team. Zeke has had the fewest yards rushing he’s ever had after the first 5 games. Dak’s passing numbers indicate games are being put on him. Romo would be turning the ball over left and right with this team.

Cebrin · Oct 9, 2019

CT Dal Fan said:
We might have won the Saints game with Tony. He was awesome at two minute drills and could have led a field goal drive late (assuming Brett Maher would have made it).

But the Packers game was lost by the defense, no matter how poorly Dak may or may not have played.

Both games were lost by turnovers, technically. Realistically, they were lost by crap coaches.

Aviano90 · Oct 9, 2019

Irvin88_4life said:
Haha you think 191 yards and 2 TDs are better than what Dak has done in the playoffs....... Stop it, you are starting to look silly.

Yup. Dak would have gotten raked over the coals with that dink and dunk performance against GB in the 2014 playoff game when GB was stacking the box and we didn’t throw deep until the 4th down play to Dez. BTW, that 4th down play was needed due to a stupid sack on 2nd down when Romo was yards away from the sidelines and lost yardage instead of flipping the ball out of bounds since he was outside of the pocket.

noshame · Oct 9, 2019

LOL
The butthurt Romo crowd is back.
No we'd be 0-5
Besides he's busy choking at golf and sounding like hell in the booth. His voice is about as healthy as his back.

But please don't stop throwing his name out there every now and then, it never gets old. :clap:

Melonfeud · Oct 9, 2019

KJJ said:
Dak has had two 400+ yard games and just over 1600 yards with 11 TDs and a passer rating of 106.0 after the first 5 games. Anyone thinks Romo would have done better than that is kidding themselves. The problem isn’t our QB! Dak is having to pretty much carry the team. Zeke has had the fewest yards rushing he’s ever had after the first 5 games. Dak’s passing numbers indicate games are being put on him. Romo would be turning the ball over left and right with this team.

Speaking of the #21,,? It's but merely a matter of time afore he eclipses his lamest of endeavoured efforted attempts in his self proclaimed title of: "king turd of poo mountain" by failing to surpass his career game low point statistically logged into his professional portfolio of 8 yards gained during 2016 vs. DENVER,,,, yeppers, I predict he'll incur a more embarrassingly telling, on field efforted showing,,, far sooner rather than later,,, book it with yer' bookies, Brougham's

TheSkaven · Oct 9, 2019

People are so fast to forget that Romo threw the backbreaking interception that cost us the 2013 game against the Pack. I’d call that a game in his prime.

No, we would still be 3-2.

Now, if Bill Belichick was coaching this team, we’d be 5-0 with either of them.

Melonfeud · Oct 9, 2019

Cebrin said:
Both games were lost by turnovers, technically. Realistically, they were lost by crap coaches.

*Man, that #29 frickin' fumble in "14" had to of been preordained at his birth, by the footballish legion of demonic God's, there just ain't any other viable reasoned explaination

Aviano90 · Oct 9, 2019

TheSkaven said:
People are so fast to forget that Romo threw the backbreaking interception that cost us the 2013 game against the Pack. I’d call that a game in his prime.

No, we would still be 3-2.

Now, if Bill Belichick was coaching this team, we’d be 5-0 with either of them.

Yup. Was carving them up all day until crunch time and 2 interceptions. He was excused for those poor throws while the defense was 100% blamed.

Irvin88_4life · Oct 9, 2019

Aviano90 said:
Yup. Dak would have gotten raked over the coals with that dink and dunk performance against GB in the 2014 playoff game when GB was stacking the box and we didn’t throw deep until the 4th down play to Dez. BTW, that 4th down play was needed due to a stupid sack on 2nd down when Romo was yards away from the sidelines and lost yardage instead of flipping the ball out of bounds since he was outside of the pocket.

He took 4 sacks that game not only that but that deep pass to Dez on 4th down Romo had Witten and Beasley wide open for the first down. Instead, on 4th down, Romo took a deep shot on a 50/50 jump ball. Had Romo threw it out and front of Dez he wouldn't have had to turn around and jump up for the ball.

Dak against GB 301 yards and 3 TDs beats Romo performance against GB any day. Only a silly Romo apologist would say Romo was better in the playoffs. Not only that but Dak lead every QB in the playoffs last year in QBR.

Frozen700 · Oct 9, 2019

Romo wasn't just a dink and dunk player.

He also had better knowledge, saw the field better, was a playmaker, and way more accurate than Dak.

So yes

Irvin88_4life · Oct 9, 2019

Jeffkills said:
I don’t know, but he wouldn’t have thrown 3 picks last Sunday....

Remember when he and TO stomped out the Pack in week 13 in 07?

Come on, Dak... Speed it up, son....

Remember when Dak went to GB his rookie year and destroyed GB.

This is fun do another one

Would Romo have us at 5-0?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

You Have an Axe to Grind

You Have an Axe to Grind

Well-Known Member

Go Seahawks!!!

I'm not dead yet......

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.

Last Man Standing

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.

Go Seahawks!!!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member