The simple minded think BPA means hey, we're on the clock? Let's take the guy at the top of our board. We're on the clock again? Grab that top guy again. Rinse, repeat. This is easy.
As if the hundreds of players in the draft all have their own distinct grade.
Nonsense. Need comes into play far more than it doesn't but in those instances where you do have just one player at the top and not a cluster of similarly rated players, you take that guy. That's BPA.
TheCount would be laughed out of any war room talking that nonsense.
Not exactly true.
Much of the time there's a player that has a far higher grade than the rest because that player hasn't been drafted and the scouts of a team really value that player.
For instance, I believe we had Anthony Brown as a 3rd round grade and we were surprised that he was still on the board in the 6th round. Or Sean Lee we had a mid-1st round grade and he was available in the 2nd. We weren't filling needs with either player at the time, but their grades were substantially better than the rest of the players.
And that's what you see with almost every team that goes BPA in the draft...if you do enough digging they'll come out and say what grade they had on a player and it's almost always substantially higher than where they drafted the player.
We won't go BPA in the first 2 rounds if the player is a QB, RB or can only play center. But other than that, we'll likely go BPA and need means very little unless you get into a situation where it's a 'tie' in grades. And when that is actually more likely to happen is in the later rounds when teams may value special teams players.
YR