Except we have so few players to fit either scheme that I'm not sure it matters. We need a massive infusion of players even if we stay with the 43. We're basically building from scratch. Lawrence is about the only guy I can think of who is pretty good and a 43 guy.
That said, I think Jerry wants the 43 because 1. that's what won in the 90s glory days and 2. it's not what Parcells ran.
- If Jerry wants the 4-3 to stay, it's because of the issues we had with guys like DLaw and Griffin being so lost, uncomfortable and out of placed that
we did just the opposite of what McCarthy was saying we would '
Not' do upon his arrival.
- We forced players to try to fit the scheme... vs having a scheme that best fit the players.
DE's standing up vs hand down 3 point stance, ..dropping DEs in man coverage (not dropping into passing lanes but actually trying to man-cover)
Flip-flopping DEs to each end tp every one to two plays,..
- I think Gregory is just as good a
natural and athletic edge rusher than even DLaw, he's just technically underdeveloped and still short on overall game experience.
But because he's still underdeveloped i'd still like to have a fine backup/rotation guy behind him.
- Its the interior DT, LB (see Jaylon) and secondary we have to really work. and we just have to work on a true legit productive 1 tech.
we resorted to flamed out bargain vets, and these bargain cheap street guys Hamilton, Woods, trade for Eli Ankou (who was inactive vs Bengals)
with no improved affect at all.,
- Both Hill and Gallimore just has to learn run defense; and I was encouraged with Hill's flashing ability to shed/penetrate in his 2nd year.
Maybe under good DL coaching we'll see Gallimore do the same under his 2nd year.
Hope we are not returning McCoy or Crawford next year.
- Sorry but I don't see the little regard for quality safety changing under Stephen Jones.
Expect more bargain cheap FA safeties, late round safeties, or no drafted safeties at all.