28-10 before 1st INT

[xwalker]

The game was already lost before the 1st INT.

Morons that call the talk radio programs all exclaim ...3 Interceptions...

Dak was bad but the INTs are irrelevant to the game.

 

[CyberB0b]

They had a quarter and a half yet to play, and only down 3 scores. It was far from over until he sealed the deal with 3 straight picks.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

The game was already lost before the 1st INT.

Morons that call the talk radio programs all exclaim ...3 Interceptions...

Dak was bad but the INTs are irrelevant to the game.

You can vote for Dak in the poll.

 

[Jarntt]

You can vote for Dak in the poll.

 

[Cowboys93]

The reason why I love this site is because I see something new every day

 

[nate dizzle]

Nobody cares about the INTs. The game was lost in the first half when the offense's first 4 drives lasted a total of about 4 minutes, got a total of 15 yards and turned the ball over once on our end of the field.

Even with the defense stiffening after the first drive and even getting a turnover right after our offense turned it over, everyone could see that the defense was going to run out of steam without the offense doing something to help them out. It was basically a replay of the playoffs last year. Defense folded after being left on the field the whole game.

The INT'S were just funny at that point.

 

[ScalperX]

This film study session really shows how bad Dak was with his progressions and timing of throws. WRs were open.

 

[stiletto]

Dak and the O played like dog-poo and it severely affected the ease of which the 49ers scored a couple of the TD's. The 3 and outs dogged the Defense all game and they got gassed (although they sucked equally anyway when they were fresh). So the point about the INTs is dumb but it's not dumb to say Dak and the O were atrocious. Dak deserves all he's getting, almost run outta town but we are financially handcuffed with him for awhile.

 

[Playmaker3128]

He looked lost except for that one drive, the 49ers were daring him to throw and he couldn't take advantage of it. Say what you want but in all 3 49ers losses the past 3 years he has been a huge problem.

2 years ago in the playoff game - 49ers missing 2 of their key defenders, he's throwing to zeke in the flat on key third downs.

Last year - He throws a crucial pick before half. Which swing momentum.

This year. - 3 ints in one game.

 

[Jarntt]

It was 1st and 10 When he threw the first interception. If we score a TD on that drive it would be 28-17 In the 3rd Qtr. The odds of us coming back were slim but there is no chance that interception was “irrelevant to the game”. Thats just trying to hide how big that interception was

 

[stiletto]

This year. - 3 ints in one game.

Game was over before he threw one pick.

 

[exciter]

The game was already lost before the 1st INT.

Morons that call the talk radio programs all exclaim ...3 Interceptions...

Dak was bad but the INTs are irrelevant to the game.

Bingo

 

[xwalker]

Nobody cares about the INTs. The game was lost in the first half when the offense's first 4 drives lasted a total of about 4 minutes, got a total of 15 yards and turned the ball over once on our end of the field.

Even with the defense stiffening after the first drive and even getting a turnover right after our offense turned it over, everyone could see that the defense was going to run out of steam without the offense doing something to help them out. It was basically a replay of the playoffs last year. Defense folded after being left on the field the whole game.

The INT'S were just funny at that point.

Talk show callers and most of CZ are focused on INTs.

Dak taking sacks instead of throwing the ball away was a much bigger problem than INTs. He would be out if the pocket and still not throw it away.

 

[xwalker]

This year. - 3 ints in one gagame.

Proving my point...People still talking about INTs despite the real problems occurring long before the 1st INT...

 

[Nav22]

Dak was pretty awful even if you remove the INTs.

Brock Purdy's an elite QB. I'm honestly more upset about THAT development than I am about Dak's poor game.

Dak's good but not elite. That's always been the case.

 

[xwalker]

They had a quarter and a half yet to play, and only down 3 scores. It was far from over until he sealed the deal with 3 straight picks.

Right...can't run can't pass, can stop the run, can't stop the pass all in the 1st half.

They were never going to come back.

 

[nobody]

The game was already lost before the 1st INT.

Morons that call the talk radio programs all exclaim ...3 Interceptions...

Dak was bad but the INTs are irrelevant to the game.

How about all the 3 and outs and red zone woes? You don't need to throw interceptions to help bury a team's chances.

 

[xwalker]

This film study session really shows how bad Dak was with his progressions and timing of throws. WRs were open.

I agree that he was bad...Why can't he throw the ball away instead of taking a sack. It's not a penalty when out of the pocket...

 

[john van brocklin]

Nobody cares about the INTs. The game was lost in the first half when the offense's first 4 drives lasted a total of about 4 minutes, got a total of 15 yards and turned the ball over once on our end of the field.

Even with the defense stiffening after the first drive and even getting a turnover right after our offense turned it over, everyone could see that the defense was going to run out of steam without the offense doing something to help them out. It was basically a replay of the playoffs last year. Defense folded after being left on the field the whole game.

The INT'S were just funny at that point.

The INTs were bad
Not getting a first down until mid way through the 2nd quarter was pathetic .

 

[Nav22]

How about all the 3 and outs and red zone woes? You don't need to throw interceptions to help bury a team's chances.

"Red zone woes"?

Guess how many times we got into the red zone Sunday night.