49ers Player Has Brutally Honest Admission On Dak Prescott

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,113
Reaction score
20,552
You are just giving vague responses that aren't dealing with the play at hand. SItuationally, Dak had options here. Teams used to play deep against Romo, because they were deadly afraid of his arm, but Garrett couldn't field a running game to save his life.
Vague response? What? I've provided details with images.

And Romo had same issues with this play against good defenses with good pass rush. Romo bashers would blame him not knowing how crappy the play and JG's scheme was. You are now sounding just like them.

Kurt Warner agrees and said this play sucks in one of his break downs.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,839
Reaction score
12,624
LOL. Get your eyes checked and watch the play again. Look where CeeDee ends up on the play. It's nowhere near 8 yards from the LOS.

Had the ball been thrown his way the defender would have been right on him just like the defender that almost intercepted the ball on the play.
Sorry, my bad.

6 yards. I was thinking the LoS was the 17, so it would have been 7, but it was the 18, so it's 6. That's 2 more than he would have got with Schultz if he hadn't been late and almost thrown a pick 6...from a perfectly clean pocket.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,839
Reaction score
12,624
MvcKlyXq_t.jpg
If you don't think this is a clean pocket, there is no reasoning with you.
 

JayFord

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,760
Reaction score
21,566
he can read it and he can throw vs zone defense and has proven it multiple times

last sunday he was just putrid and be it zone or man he was terrible

who throws the ball when you see its curls and theyre playing zone that means all 11 eyes are on you and zone stops curls
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,886
Reaction score
37,365
Vague response? What? I've provided details with images.

And Romo had same issues with this play against good defenses with good pass rush. Romo bashers would blame him not knowing how crappy the play and JG's scheme was. You are now sounding just like them.

Kurt Warner agrees and said this play sucks in one of his break downs.
Having problem with certain plays doesn't mean it's a problem all the time. What we are referring to is the awful QB play here that is completely independent of the covered receivers. Dak stares down the receivers, couldn't diagnose the defense and had the option to throw to period, if he wasn't doing what his normal bad QB is that he demonstrates time in and time out.

Dak can't shine the boots of Romo period. Romo is, even at this age, probably light years better than Dak and in Moore's offense is not Garrett's offense. Yes, they both stem from the same coaching tree and may use similar routes at times, that doesn't mean they call plays in the same way.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,113
Reaction score
20,552
Having problem with certain plays doesn't mean it's a problem all the time. What we are referring to is the awful QB play here that is completely independent of the covered receivers. Dak stares down the receivers, couldn't diagnose the defense and had the option to throw to period, if he wasn't doing what his normal bad QB is that he demonstrates time in and time out.

Dak can't shine the boots of Romo period. Romo is, even at this age, probably light years better than Dak and in Moore's offense is not Garrett's offense. Yes, they both stem from the same coaching tree and may use similar routes at times, that doesn't mean they call plays in the same way.
You sound like the typical clueless Romo bashers I used to debate with.

I got news for you. Our offensive problem has more to do with JG'S sucky scheme than the QBs. That's the reason Romo and any other QBs after him has failed to get us anywhere since 2007. We got rid of JG. Unfortunately his stench is still around .
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,113
Reaction score
20,552
That angle is much worse than the other. Much more deceptive as far as the spacing...and still shows a good pocket.
Sure it is. Let me guess that should have been an easy TD. Right? :lmao:
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,839
Reaction score
12,624
Sure it is. Let me guess that should have been an easy TD. Right? :lmao:
We already discussed this. 6 yards.

Do you understand perspective? A shot more from the side flattens the spacing. It doesn't show accuarately like the above shot. And STILL it is a good pocket...smh.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,113
Reaction score
20,552
We already discussed this. 6 yards.

Do you understand perspective? A shot more from the side flattens the spacing. It doesn't show accuarately like the above shot. And STILL it is a good pocket...smh.
Keep making stuff up. CeeDee running in an angle was a good one.

Did you use a protractor on your screen to get the exact angle? What was it? .0000088 degrees? :lmao2:
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,839
Reaction score
12,624
Keep making stuff up. CeeDee running in an angle was a good one.

Did you use a protractor on your screen to get the exact angle? What was it? .0000088 degrees? :lmao2:
Well, what's 2-3 yards over about 10-15 yards.

Yes, that's an angle.

Khiladi is right. You can't address things and just deflect.

Fact - CD was far more open than Schultz
Fact - Dak had a clean pocket.
Fact - Dak made the worst decision/throw possible.
 

NumOneQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,438
Reaction score
3,764
Hey @NumOneQB, you need to do more studying on football. QB runs are more effective when the defense is in man coverage because their eyes are not on the QB like they are in zone defense.
How about you study a little bit more? You can run man with a spy or zone with a spy against a running QB. I’m not talking about which defense will result in more yardage per scramble. If the defense is consistently sitting in a soft middle zone the threat of running can hold the interior LBs enough to open a window. Or force them to spy taking one defender out of pass coverage. Too many times the defense had zero worries about Dak attempting to run….
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,113
Reaction score
20,552
Well, what's 2-3 yards over about 10-15 yards.

Yes, that's an angle.

Khiladi is right. You can't address things and just deflect.

Fact - CD was far more open than Schultz
Fact - Dak had a clean pocket.
Fact - Dak made the worst decision/throw possible.
Deflect? Who is deflecting by making stuff up? CeeDee was running on an angle so he could have gotten easy 8 yards? LOL. Yeh that was good one.
And Killadi used to say JG sucks when it was Romo who had issues with the same play. Now he is flip flopping because it's Dak who is getting burned by this dumb play.

He is as bad as Colon Turd when it comes to waffling.

Why don't you show proof he wasn't running parallel to the LOS and could have gotten EASY 8 yards?

I am waiting.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,839
Reaction score
12,624
Deflect? Who is deflecting by making stuff up? CeeDee was running on an angle so he could have gotten easy 8 yards? LOL. Yeh that was good one.
And Killadi used to say JG sucks when it was Romo who had issues with the same play. Now he is flip flopping because it's Dak who is getting burned by this dumb play.

He is as bad as Colon Turd when it comes to waffling.

Why don't you show proof he wasn't running parallel to the LOS and could have gotten EASY 8 yards?

I am waiting.
I have already revised down to 6 yards several times. That you keep bringing up 8 is 100% deflection.

Can you read or are you just a troll?


Get out of here with the Romo nonsense.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,113
Reaction score
20,552
I have already revised down to 6 yards several times. That you keep bringing up 8 is 100% deflection.

Can you read or are you just a troll?


Get out of here with the Romo nonsense.
It's hard to keep ups since you keep changing your story. 6 yards is your final answers now? OK. LOL.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,839
Reaction score
12,624
It's hard to keep ups since you keep changing your story. 6 yards is your final answers now? OK. LOL.
Keep changing? I revised to six...ONCE.

Apparently, troll and liar are the answer to my question.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,113
Reaction score
20,552
Keep changing? I revised to six...ONCE.

Apparently, troll and liar are the answer to my question.
That wasn't the only story you changed. There were others like "running on an angle" story etc..
 
Top