5 Reasons the Eagles will take a step back.

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
kmd24 said:
Care to guess what those two stat lines are?
Hambrick in 2001. There was a significant drop in 2002, so it isn't the same.

More like a HB who has 209 touches (55, 154) in two years and missed 2 games in those two years due to injury despite limited action. I mean, really, he has hardly seen the field enough to be injured. By comparison, Staley had well over 300 touches (366, 320) each year he started all 16 games for the Eagles.

I would also add that Westbrook has never carried the ball more than 15 times in ANY game during his entire career. The Eagles top three backs combined for an *average* of 21 carries a game last year.
Okay...we have established that he is unproven...So was Ahman Green, look it up there are sooo many similarities with Westbrook and Green. I need to go so I can't do it now.

The jury is still out on Westbrook's durability. There's a reason Philly was interested in Eddie George even before Buckhalter was injured.

Please tell me why you think that Philly would be interested in George? Did you read it in a Dallas article? Does Reid have your home phone number? Was it Jesus?

I heard that George was interested in Philly, but that Philly didn't want him unless he came extremely cheap.

I read somewhere that the Eagles called George the first day he was released and said "We don't want you". Do I believe it? No not really, but everything I read said they didn't want him.
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
You were 8 for 4 years? Were you born on February 29th?

I was born in 1987, your last Super Bowl was after the 1995 season (in 1996 but I was born in July).

|95
-87
8
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
AJM1613 said:
I was born in 1987, your last Super Bowl was after the 1995 season (in 1996 but I was born in July).

|95
-87
8

Don't be a moron. You said you weren't around for our 3 superbowls cuz you were 8.

You may have been 8 when we played ONE of those superbowls, but not all 3.

Not unless your an alien and have a totally different calender then the one we use here on earth.

Now, why don't you go to an eagirls board somewhere. Why do you spend so much time at a COWBOYS message board? You've GOT to be a closet Cowboys fan. Got to be.
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
Don't be a moron. You said you weren't around for our 3 superbowls cuz you were 8.

You may have been 8 when we played ONE of those superbowls, but not all 3.

Not unless your an alien and have a totally different calender then the one we use here on earth.

Now, why don't you go to an eagirls board somewhere. Why do you spend so much time at a COWBOYS message board? You've GOT to be a closet Cowboys fan. Got to be.

You took that extremely literally. Okay you want me to kiss it and make it all better?

I was 5 when you won your 3rd one.
I was 6 when you won your 4th one.
I was 7 when San Francisco beat you.
I was 8 when you won your 5th one.

Fixed?
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
AJM1613 said:
You took that extremely literally. Okay you want me to kiss it and make it all better?

I was 5 when you won your 3rd one.
I was 6 when you won your 4th one.
I was 7 when San Francisco beat you.
I was 8 when you won your 5th one.

Fixed?


San Francisco didn't beat me. The refs beat us that game.


And learn to take a joke, Eagirls fan. I mean, you should be able to take a joke considering your favorite team is a joke itself.
 

Tio

Armchair QB
Messages
5,344
Reaction score
339
AJM1613 said:
Hambrick in 2001. There was a significant drop in 2002, so it isn't the same.
Just because you say it isn't the same, doesn't make it true. Try to bring facts...
Okay...we have established that he is unproven...So was Ahman Green, look it up there are sooo many similarities with Westbrook and Green. I need to go so I can't do it now.
Just because another RB was able to succeed, doesn't mean every one can. Priest holmes was undrafted, does that mean every undrafted guy can be the best RB in the league? No.


Please tell me why you think that Philly would be interested in George? Did you read it in a Dallas article? Does Reid have your home phone number? Was it Jesus?
It might ahve been the fact that every reporter said the eagles were one of georges serious possibilities?

[/QUOTE]
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
San Francisco didn't beat me. The refs beat us that game.


And learn to take a joke, Eagirls fan. I mean, you should be able to take a joke considering your favorite team is a joke itself.

I added that in there because I knew someone would say "the refs beat us", "bad coaching beat us" or something like that.
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
RW31 said:
It might ahve been the fact that every reporter said the eagles were one of georges serious possibilities?

Because George said he wanted to go to Philly... :rolleyes:
 

kmd24

Active Member
Messages
3,436
Reaction score
0
AJM1613 said:
Hambrick in 2001. There was a significant drop in 2002, so it isn't the same.

The drop strengthens my point rather than weakens it. Small sample sizes don't prove much. No one has "forgotten" that Westbrook was an effective starter. He's been effective, and he's started, but a guy who's never had more than 15 carries in a game is hardly an effective starter.

AJM1613 said:
Okay...we have established that he is unproven.

Case closed.

AJM1613 said:
I heard that George was interested in Philly, but that Philly didn't want him unless he came extremely cheap.

So Philly wanted him.
 

kmd24

Active Member
Messages
3,436
Reaction score
0
AJM1613 said:
According to me. :rolleyes:

There you go again believing things without any proof.

I consider print and television journalism to constitute proof, and you admitted to hearing something similar.
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
kmd24 said:
I consider print and television journalism to constitute proof, and you admitted to hearing something similar.

All I heard (from everyone besides fans) was that there was NO interest.

The Eagles' website reporter, who works with Reid and the team everyday said there was no interest and someone on the radio said that the Eagles called George after he publicly lobied to come here and said "we don't want you". I wouldn't mind having him as a third HB and I wanted him until you signed him, but the Eagles seem to have felt differently.
 

Timbo2st

Benched
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
0
The eagles had problems last year in preseason and everyone thought they would have a bad year but look what happened , they were still playing while dallas watched them on TV.


Don't be shocked when the eagles win the division again.....(people who are picking dallas to win the division :rolleyes: they'll end up 3rd)


Philly-12-4
Commanders-10-6
dallas-8-8
giants-6-10
 

Tio

Armchair QB
Messages
5,344
Reaction score
339
Timbo2st said:
The eagles had problems last year in preseason and everyone thought they would have a bad year but look what happened , they were still playing while dallas watched them on TV.


Don't be shocked when the eagles win the division again.....(people who are picking dallas to win the division :rolleyes: they'll end up 3rd)


Philly-12-4
Commanders-10-6
dallas-8-8
giants-6-10
Lmao. The eagles defense will get exposed hard. Mcnabb is to allow TO to be a weapon. Add in the fact that they have 1 rb who has never carried the load. Well, it just spells disaster with a D.
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
RW31 said:
Lmao. The eagles defense will get exposed hard. Mcnabb is to allow TO to be a weapon. Add in the fact that they have 1 rb who has never carried the load. Well, it just spells disaster with a D.

You have one one HB that has never carried the load and one over the hill HB, same as us!
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,709
Reaction score
17,370
AJM1613 said:
All I heard (from everyone besides fans) was that there was NO interest.

The Eagles' website reporter, who works with Reid and the team everyday said there was no interest and someone on the radio said that the Eagles called George after he publicly lobied to come here and said "we don't want you". I wouldn't mind having him as a third HB and I wanted him until you signed him, but the Eagles seem to have felt differently.


Well guess what?

"You are regretting it!"
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
Ken said:
Well guess what?

"You are regretting it!"

Not really...I was regretting it more right after it happened, but the more I see of George, the happier I become. Levens should be a better backup.
 

Tio

Armchair QB
Messages
5,344
Reaction score
339
Are you trying to say levens = george? And endurance isn't a question with JJ, it is with westbrook however.
 

AJM1613

New Member
Messages
2,924
Reaction score
0
RW31 said:
Are you trying to say levens = george? And endurance isn't a question with JJ, it is with westbrook however.

No I am not saying that, George as a feature back is a lot better.

But as a backup in the WCO, I would rather have Levens.
 
Top