A. Glenn covering WR Roy Williams?

eduncan22;1498525 said:
2006 34 Sacks Passing Defense 24th 219.0 YPG
2005 37 Sacks Passing Defense 11th 192.7 YPG
2004 33 Sacks Passing Defense 21st 220.1 YPG
2003 32 Sacks Passing Defense 1st 164.4 YPG
2002 24 Sacks Passing Defense 19th 215.6 YPG


As you can clearly see, sacks do not make a Pass Defense great.

Our 2003 team was ranked 1st, but only had 32 sacks.


The Cowboys needed to draft a quality, blue chip corner.
Whoa there, my friend. You've already tried that argument once, remember? Just click on the link in my sig to refresh your memory.

Sincerely,

Aaron Glenn :)
 
Roy Williams making aggies look foolish in coverage...memories...
 
DallasEast;1498552 said:
Whoa there, my friend. You've already tried that argument once, remember? Just click on the link in my sig to refresh your memory.

Sincerely,

Aaron Glenn :)

i did :D

DallasEast said:
This is your argument, with additional info (and interception numbers which you'll probably skewer) you neglected to include. Namely, the same data of playoff teams (e.g. the best teams of that particular season) from 2002 through 2006:


2002: Tampa Bay, 43 Sacks [NFL rank: 6 (tie)], 155.6 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 1st], 31 Interceptions [NFL rank: 1st]
2002: Indianapolis, 36 Sacks [NFL rank: 16 (tie)], 182.3 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 2nd], 10 Interceptions [NFL rank: 26th (tie)]
2002: Green Bay, 43 Sacks [NFL rank: 6 (tie)], 186.7 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 3rd], 24 Interceptions [NFL rank: 3rd (tie)]
2002: Philadelphia, 56 Sacks [NFL rank: 1], 193.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 7th], 15 Interceptions [NFL rank: 20th (tie)]
2002: New York (N), 37 Sacks [NFL rank: 15], 194.9 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 9th], 11 Interceptions [NFL rank: 25th]
2002: Cleveland, 28 Sacks [NFL rank: 27 (tie)], 204.3 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 15th], 17 Interceptions [NFL rank: 15th (tie)]
2002: Atlanta, 47 Sacks [NFL rank: 4 (tie)], 205.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 16th], 24 Interceptions [NFL rank: 3rd (tie)]
2002: Dallas, 24 Sacks [NFL rank: 30 (tie)], 215.6 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 19th], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 8th (tie)]
2002: Pittsburgh, 50 Sacks [NFL rank: 3], 216.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 20th], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 8th (tie)]
2002: New York (A), 30 Sacks [NFL rank: 26], 218.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 21st], 15 Interceptions [NFL rank: 20th (tie)]
2002: San Francisco, 32 Sacks [NFL rank: 24], 219.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 22nd], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 8th (tie)]
2002: Oakland, 43 Sacks [NFL rank: 6 (tie)], 220.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 23rd], 21 Interceptions [NFL rank: 5th (tie)]
2002: Tennessee, 40 Sacks [NFL rank: 9 (tie)], 221.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 25th], 18 Interceptions [NFL rank: 12th (tie)]


2003: Dallas, 32 Sacks [NFL rank: 21 (tie)], 164.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 1st], 13 Interceptions [NFL rank: 25th (tie)]
2003: Baltimore, 47 Sacks [NFL rank: 1], 175.3 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 4th], 24 Interceptions [NFL rank: 4th (tie)]
2003: Indianapolis, 31 Sacks [NFL rank: 23], 175.6 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 5th], 15 Interceptions [NFL rank: 14th (tie)]
2003: Denver, 36 Sacks [NFL rank: 13 (tie)], 176.8 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 6th], 9 Interceptions [NFL rank: 32nd]
2003: Carolina, 40 Sacks [NFL rank: 7 (tie)], 187.7 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 9th], 16 Interceptions [NFL rank: 12th (tie)]
2003: St. Louis, 42 Sacks [NFL rank: 4 (tie)], 192 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 12th], 24 Interceptions [NFL rank: 4th (tie)]
2003: New England, 41 Sacks [NFL rank: 6], 202 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 15th], 29 Interceptions [NFL rank: 1st]
2003: Philadelphia, 38 Sacks [NFL rank: 9 (tie)], 202.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 16th], 13 Interceptions [NFL rank: 25th (tie)]
2003: Kansas City, 36 Sacks [NFL rank: 13 (tie)], 210.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 20th], 25 Interceptions [NFL rank: 3rd]
2003: Green Bay, 34 Sacks [NFL rank: 20], 212.5 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 23rd], 21 Interceptions [NFL rank: 8th (tie)]
2003: Seattle, 40 Sacks [NFL rank: 7 (tie)], 217.5 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 27th], 16 Interceptions [NFL rank: 12th (tie)]
2003: Tennessee, 38 Sacks [NFL rank: 9 (tie)], 225.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 30th], 21 Interceptions [NFL rank: 8th (tie)]


2004: Pittsburgh, 41 Sacks [NFL rank: 7 (tie)], 177.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 4th], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 9th (tie)]
2004: Denver, 38 Sacks [NFL rank: 14 (tie)], 184.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 6th], 12 Interceptions [NFL rank: 27th]
2004: New York (N), 40 Sacks [NFL rank: 9 (tie)], 189.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 8th], 14 Interceptions [NFL rank: 22nd (tie)]
2004: St. Louis, 34 Sacks [NFL rank: 24 (tie)], 198.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 11th], 6 Interceptions [NFL rank: 32nd]
2004: Philadelphia, 47 Sacks [NFL rank: 2], 200.8 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 12th], 17 Interceptions [NFL rank: 15th (tie)]
2004: New England, 45 Sacks [NFL rank: 3 (tie)], 212.5 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 17th], 20 Interceptions [NFL rank: 7th (tie)]
2004: Dallas, 33 Sacks [NFL rank: 26], 220.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 21st], 13 Interceptions [NFL rank: 24th (tie)]
2004: Atlanta, 48 Sacks [NFL rank: 1], 220.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 22nd], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 9th (tie)]
2004: Seattle, 36 Sacks [NFL rank: 21 (tie)], 224.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 23rd], 23 Interceptions [NFL rank: 3rd (tie)]
2004: Green Bay, 40 Sacks [NFL rank: 9 (tie)], 228.9 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 25th], 8 Interceptions [NFL rank: 31st]
2004: Indianapolis, 45 Sacks [NFL rank: 3 (tie)], 243.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 28th], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 9th (tie)]
2004: Minnesota, 39 Sacks [NFL rank: 12 (tie)], 243.5 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 29th], 11 Interceptions [NFL rank: 28th]
2004: San Diego, 29 Sacks [NFL rank: 29 (tie)], 253.3 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 31st], 23 Interceptions [NFL rank: 3rd (tie)]


2005: Chicago, 41 Sacks [NFL rank: 8 (tie)], 179.5 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 5th], 24 Interceptions [NFL rank: 2nd (tie)]
2005: Tampa Bay, 36 Sacks [NFL rank: 18 (tie)], 183.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 6th], 17 Interceptions [NFL rank: 10th (tie)]
2005: Jacksonville, 47 Sacks [NFL rank: 3 (tie)], 184.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 7th], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 7th (tie)]
2005: Carolina, 45 Sacks [NFL rank: 7], 191.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 9th], 23 Interceptions [NFL rank: 4th]
2005: Washington, 35 Sacks [NFL rank: 20 (tie)], 192.6 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 10th], 16 Interceptions [NFL rank: 14th (tie)]
2005: Dallas, 37 Sacks [NFL rank: 14 (tie)], 192.7 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 11th], 15 Interceptions [NFL rank: 19th (tie)]
2005: Indianapolis, 46 Sacks [NFL rank: 5 (tie)], 196.9 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 15th], 18 Interceptions [NFL rank: 9th]
2005: Pittsburgh, 47 Sacks [NFL rank: 3 (tie)], 198 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 16th], 15 Interceptions [NFL rank: 19th (tie)]
2005: Seattle, 50 Sacks [NFL rank: 1], 222.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 25th], 16 Interceptions [NFL rank: 14th (tie)]
2005: Cincinnati, 28 Sacks [NFL rank: 28 (tie)], 223.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 26th], 31 Interceptions [NFL rank: 1st]
2005: New York (N), 41 Sacks [NFL rank: 8 (tie)], 224 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 27th], 17 Interceptions [NFL rank: 10th (tie)]
2005: Denver, 28 Sacks [NFL rank: 28 (tie)], 227.7 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 29th], 20 Interceptions [NFL rank: 6th]
2005: New England, 33 Sacks [NFL rank: 23], 231.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 31st], 10 Interceptions [NFL rank: 26th (tie)]


2006: Indianapolis, 25 Sacks [NFL rank: 30 (tie)], 159.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 2nd], 15 Interceptions [NFL rank: 20th (tie)]
2006: New Orleans, 38 Sacks [NFL rank: 12 (tie)], 178.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 3rd], 11 Interceptions [NFL rank: 28th (tie)]
2006: Baltimore, 60 Sacks [NFL rank: 2], 188.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 6th], 28 Interceptions [NFL rank: 1st]
2006: Philadelphia, 40 Sacks [NFL rank: 8 (tie)], 191.7 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 9th], 19 Interceptions [NFL rank: 8th (tie)]
2006: Chicago, 40 Sacks [NFL rank: 8 (tie)], 194.8 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 11th], 24 Interceptions [NFL rank: 2nd]
2006: New England, 44 Sacks [NFL rank: 5], 200.2 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 12th], 22 Interceptions [NFL rank: 4th]
2006: San Diego, 61 Sacks [NFL rank: 1], 200.8 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 13th], 16 Interceptions [NFL rank: 17th (tie)]
2006: New York (A), 35 Sacks [NFL rank: 15 (tie)], 201.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 14th], 16 Interceptions [NFL rank: 17th (tie)]
2006: Seattle, 41 Sacks [NFL rank: 6 (tie)], 203.5 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 16th], 12 Interceptions [NFL rank: 25th (tie)]
2006: Kansas City, 32 Sacks [NFL rank: 23 (tie)], 208.4 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 18th], 15 Interceptions [NFL rank: 20th (tie)]
2006: Dallas, 34 Sacks [NFL rank: 19 (tie)], 219.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 24th], 18 Interceptions [NFL rank: 10th (tie)]
2006: New York (N), 32 Sacks [NFL rank: 23 (tie)], 228.1 YPG Passing Defense [NFL rank: 28th], 17 Interceptions [NFL rank: 13th (tie)]



Try not to hide behind the '06 Colts and Eisen, ya hear? ;)
 
eduncan22;1498525 said:
2006 34 Sacks Passing Defense 24th 219.0 YPG
2005 37 Sacks Passing Defense 11th 192.7 YPG
2004 33 Sacks Passing Defense 21st 220.1 YPG
2003 32 Sacks Passing Defense 1st 164.4 YPG
2002 24 Sacks Passing Defense 19th 215.6 YPG


As you can clearly see, sacks do not make a Pass Defense great.

Our 2003 team was ranked 1st, but only had 32 sacks.


The Cowboys needed to draft a quality, blue chip corner.

With Ross, Revis, and Hall all off the board when we picked, who would you liked to see us draft?
 
I can’t wait to see this new Wade Phillips defense where no one is our secondary is going to be responsible for covering anybody and no one on our front 7 is going to be responsible for taking on a block.
 
InmanRoshi;1498762 said:
I can’t wait to see this new Wade Phillips defense where no one is our secondary is going to be responsible for covering anybody and no one on our front 7 is going to be responsible for taking on a block.


yea cause we all know, in SD they got burned left and right and couldn't stop a single soul, on there way to a 14-2 record
 
eduncan22;1498525 said:
2006 34 Sacks Passing Defense 24th 219.0 YPG
2005 37 Sacks Passing Defense 11th 192.7 YPG
2004 33 Sacks Passing Defense 21st 220.1 YPG
2003 32 Sacks Passing Defense 1st 164.4 YPG
2002 24 Sacks Passing Defense 19th 215.6 YPG


As you can clearly see, sacks do not make a Pass Defense great.

Our 2003 team was ranked 1st, but only had 32 sacks.



The Cowboys needed to draft a quality, blue chip corner.


We lead the league in Time Of Possession that year. That is the ONLY reason we ranked so high on defense.
 
Rack;1498812 said:
We lead the league in Time Of Possession that year. That is the ONLY reason we ranked so high on defense.

Last year SD was 4th in TOP .....
 
InmanRoshi;1498762 said:
I can’t wait to see this new Wade Phillips defense where no one is our secondary is going to be responsible for covering anybody and no one on our front 7 is going to be responsible for taking on a block.

dargonking999;1498789 said:
yea cause we all know, in SD they got burned left and right and couldn't stop a single soul, on there way to a 14-2 record

I'm sure LT had nothing to do with their 14-2 record.
 
Its because Newman isn't good enough to cover Roy Williams. Parcells didn't want to expose Newman :lmao2:
 
MarkBrunell;1498848 said:
Its because Newman isn't good enough to cover Roy Williams. Parcells didn't want to expose Newman :lmao2:

Not many CBs are good enough to cover Roy Williams.

Certainly none on your roster.
 
MarkBrunell;1498848 said:
Its because Newman isn't good enough to cover Roy Williams. Parcells didn't want to expose Newman
I thought I smelled cabbage.
 
superpunk;1498852 said:
I thought I smelled cabbage.


Don't disrespect cabbage like that.

I enjoy my corned beef and cabbage.....
 
MarkBrunell;1498848 said:
Its because Newman isn't good enough to cover Roy Williams. Parcells didn't want to expose Newman :lmao2:

And Carlos Rogers couldn't cover Bill Parcells. What's your point? :confused:



:rolleyes:
 
JPM;1498833 said:
I'm sure LT had nothing to do with their 14-2 record.


I'm sure the defense wasn't the reason why the chagers were able to run the ball when they wanted. Or when LT wasn't having the game of the week, and they were winning (Seattle game anyone?)
 
Vintage;1498857 said:
Don't disrespect cabbage like that.

I enjoy my corned beef and cabbage.....


now that's what I'm talking about!:D
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,232
Messages
13,859,929
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top