A mid-camp look at the NFC East: Dallas in a landslide

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Cockiness is dangerous in all sports. It's important to avoid it at every turn, and especially in such an emotional and thin-lined league like the NFL. It's claimed more than its share of promising teams and turned them into last-place comedy fodder.

But dang it if I can figure out a way Dallas loses the NFC East outside of a colossal injury to Romo or a rash of them to key players. I just don't see how.

Simply put, this division looks putrid, other than the Cowboys.

Philadelphia Eagles: I just don't get the fascination. I guess if you put your Fantasy Football or Madden videogame hat on, this thing looks innovative and unstoppable. But from a REAL football standpoint, it's haphazard, foolish, and plays out like a ticking time bomb.

Chip keeps running off everybody that hurt Dallas. Gone are McCoy, Jackson, Maclin, and even Foles, who had some game to him. Ran off a good offensive lineman, too, as an early Christmas present. Somebody needs to check Chip to see if he's wearing Cowboys-star boxers or briefs, or check to see if he's filled out any college coaching applications yet.

The loss of the Mariotta sweepstakes seems to have sent Chip stir crazy, and now he's shuffling around with misfit quarterbacks looking to find themselves awash. Their lone realistic hope is that Sam Bradford can reclaim his knees and remember how to play quarterback. He hasn't done that particularly well in a long, long time. Against a good pass rush, I see these quarterbacks folding like a pair of twos at the big table.

Even if the best case QB situation comes into focus, they still have to have one of their young receivers become an immediate star, or the running game has to become better than Dallas' of last year out of the gate. I just don't see this coming together fast enough, or balanced enough, to rack up enough wins. Murray is good, as is Matthews, as is Sproles. But so what? That doesn't win without a consistent passing attack to go with it. And Murray and Matthews have long injury histories to boot.

Defensively, the Eagles suffer mightily from Chip's experimental wizardy. They have a stout defensive line, but the number of plays wears on them, especially as the number of games racks up on their big bodies. Add to that a weak secondary coupled with an iffy crop of linebackers. McCoy fetched a good one from Buffalo in Kiko Alonso, who's still trying to recover from a torn ACL last year.

I expect this to wane as the season marches on like usual, only faster this time. They're out of it by Thanksgiving.

New York Giants: I have immense respect for Tom Coughlin, and Eli Manning is a legitimate pro quarterback with rings. That commands attention right there, and it's the reason I initially thought they were the biggest threat. But Holy Mara, this thing is off to an ugly start.


Eli played four series in their first preseason game, and he didn't have a chance. They amassed 38 whole yards and one first down. The season-ending loss of their left tackle has them scrambling on an already weak front. Eli will be under a heavy pass rush all season, so those talented wideouts will be pressed constantly. If they can't effectively run behind that o-line, which I don't think they can, this could be a painfully sluggish offense.


Add to that the loss of their best pass rusher to July 4th explosion and a defense bereft of stars and proven pedigree, and this doesn't look like a typical Giants team that can play possession and field position with opponents. The makeup of this team won't allow Coughlin to manage games like he does so well.


Washington Commanders: I laughed when I heard the gushing about how well RG3 played in the preseason opener. They were "so encouraged" by his 4-for-8 performance for 36 yards. Garcon dropped a deep ball, but still, does anyone think Griffin is ready to suddenly command an offense and read defenses? Nope, he'll tuck and run, and that spells doom.

The Commanders, as always, have talent sprinkled about their roster. Pretty good offensive and defensive lines, reasonable skill players, seemingly adequate elsewhere.

The Commanders remain who they are, which was Dallas for a good long while but no more. Dysfunctional and rudderless, with nary a clue from coach or quarterback. More of the same.


Dallas Cowboys: I think we're way overly worried about the running backs for two reasons. First, these current guys are far from bad, and second, if something is needed, the Cowboys have the ammo and opportunity to go get what they need.

Dallas still stands with an elite QB, an elite offensive line, and an elite group of receivers. Average running backs....oh the horror. I think the running game remains highly potent behind this line.

What truly is exciting is how the new defensive line is shaping up. They're winning battles in camp against the o-line; last year they got embarrassed in camp. The corners are shaping up to be a team strength, if Sean Lee holds up, the defensive leader is back to this mix. With a pass rush, this could be a top 10 defense in the league.

The coaching staff as a whole is the best in the division, and the specialists are rock solid. There really aren't any weaknesses to this team, just a couple of areas of average-ness. What team doesn't have at least a couple areas of question? None.


And so, the division in my eyes mid-camp:

Dallas 12-4 (6-0 in the division will help)
Philly 7-9 (win early, but fade fast)
New York 6-10 (never gets off the ground)
Washington 5-11 (same old Commanders)
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,731
Reaction score
95,252
I think people are being shortsighted with the Eagles. Will they win the division? Probably not. But this is the best Eagles team on paper in the 3 years Kelly has been there. Their front seven is very, very good. They improved in the secondary by dumping Williams and Fletcher, their starting CBs.

It all hinges on Bradford. If (and that's a big if) he's healthy, they are going to be a very good team. Better than us? At this point, not really but the idea that we are 5 games better than them is wishful thinking IMO.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,731
Reaction score
95,252
Sam Bradford isn't going to win 10 games. And Eli is going to be dead behind that offensive line.

Foles won 10. And they won 10 games with the mix of Foles and Sanchez last year.

Bradford, if healthy, is better than any QB Kelly has had.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,031
Reaction score
22,617
Definitely don't sleep on the Eagles...if that is possible with the media hype to their advantage.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
The Eagles wont be that bad, neither will the Giants. I expect 10 wins for Philly, 8-10 for New York.

The Giants are already starting to panic as they are trying to cope with injuries to their secondary and OL. They also will have to make up Pierre-Paul's production. 6-8 wins sounds right to me.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I think people are being shortsighted with the Eagles. Will they win the division? Probably not. But this is the best Eagles team on paper in the 3 years Kelly has been there. Their front seven is very, very good. They improved in the secondary by dumping Williams and Fletcher, their starting CBs.

It all hinges on Bradford. If (and that's a big if) he's healthy, they are going to be a very good team. Better than us? At this point, not really but the idea that we are 5 games better than them is wishful thinking IMO.

Outside of the running backs, Fletcher Cox, and Kiko Alonso.......who?

You don't get better by dumping players without replacing them with better players. Byron Maxwell is nothing special. He just played for a great defense.
 

Swanny

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,595
Reaction score
3,382
Foles won 10. And they won 10 games with the mix of Foles and Sanchez last year.

Bradford, if healthy, is better than any QB Kelly has had.

I think Philly wins 9 or 10 games. But Bradford is not better than Foles
 

Garrettop

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
2,121
I was ready to put the Giants 2nd in the division prior to the injury situation. Now I think they may have to worry about last place.
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,082
Reaction score
16,851
I think people are being shortsighted with the Eagles. Will they win the division? Probably not. But this is the best Eagles team on paper in the 3 years Kelly has been there. Their front seven is very, very good. They improved in the secondary by dumping Williams and Fletcher, their starting CBs.

It all hinges on Bradford. If (and that's a big if) he's healthy, they are going to be a very good team. Better than us? At this point, not really but the idea that we are 5 games better than them is wishful thinking IMO.

I agree.

Erod has brought us some good reading and analysis. Sadly, this time he's lost his ball in the weeds. He doesn't get Chip Kelly. The guy is an extremely astute coach. Philly was one game behind us last year and will be battling us for the division again in 2015.
 

The Natural

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,207
Reaction score
18,969
Sam Bradford isn't going to win 10 games. And Eli is going to be dead behind that offensive line.

Fortunately for them Sam Bradford doesn't have to go out and try to win 10 games alone. I think their WR's are suspect and secondary unproven, but they've got an alright offensive line, 2 decent backs, and a pretty solid defensive line..speaking objectively, I dont see 9 losses in their schedule.

I can see them going 3-3 in the division, 4-2 at best.

The NFC South is a joke but the Falcons and Panthers might give them trouble. They'll probably go 3-1

AFC East: I think they beat Buffalo and NYJ, lose to Dolphins and Patriots.

Detroit will be a tough game and for whatever reason the Cardinals always give them trouble. 1-1

Based on the schedule looks like a 9/10 win team.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,731
Reaction score
95,252
You apparently didn't see Bradford play in St. Louis. He was awful.

I did. And Foles was mediocre before Kelly got him and Kelly turned him into a much different player. Shoot, Kelly made Sanchez look passable at times. If Kelly can squeeze 10 wins out of Nick Foles/Sanchez, he likely can squeeze 10 out of Bradford.
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,082
Reaction score
16,851
I think Philly wins 9 or 10 games. But Bradford is not better than Foles

I think Foles only succeeded because of Philly and the offensive scheme. Bradford could be dangerous there.
 

dragon_mikal

Fire Garrett
Messages
10,453
Reaction score
7,136
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
200.gif
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The Eagles Super Bowl is week 2. They HAVE to beat Dallas at home, or that city will descend on them, and it could get ugly very fast.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,731
Reaction score
95,252
Outside of the running backs, Fletcher Cox, and Kiko Alonso.......who?

You don't get better by dumping players without replacing them with better players. Byron Maxwell is nothing special. He just played for a great defense.

They have two very good OTs and a good C. Matthews, their rookie WR, had 67 catches and 8 TDs last year. He's pretty good. As you said their RBs are very good. Cox is a stud. Logan is a solid NT. Barwin had double digit sacks. Kendricks is very good. I never said Maxwell is special. But if you don't think he's better than either Cary Williams or Bradley Fletcher, then you are smoking something.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,731
Reaction score
95,252
I think Philly wins 9 or 10 games. But Bradford is not better than Foles

Yes he is. Foles had one ridiculous season where everything went right for him. Then in his second season, when defenses had time to scout him and the offense, all his flaws came out - poor under pressure, his weak arm started to show itself as he tried to make more difficult throws, etc. His decision making, which was supposed to be his strength, was awful.

Bradford, if healthy (again that's a big if) is better than Foles. I bet Foles flames out big time in St. Louis.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
They have two very good OTs and a good C. Matthews, their rookie WR, had 67 catches and 8 TDs last year. He's pretty good. As you said their RBs are very good. Cox is a stud. Logan is a solid NT. Barwin had double digit sacks. Kendricks is very good. I never said Maxwell is special. But if you don't think he's better than either Cary Williams or Bradley Fletcher, then you are smoking something.

Yes, some good talent sprinkled around....like every team.

But, who's going to quarterback this thing? Where's the speed they had in McCoy? This is a terrible offense for Demarco Murray's style. Where's Jackson and Maclin? Is Jordan Matthews a No. 1 receiver?

I don't see how it holds up for full games, let alone a season.
 
Top