MileyDancer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,669
- Reaction score
- 5,321
And Laurent RobinsonAnd Miles Austin, Cole Beasley, Dez Bryant, and Sam Hurd.
And how much does Witten owe his success to Romo?
And Laurent RobinsonAnd Miles Austin, Cole Beasley, Dez Bryant, and Sam Hurd.
And how much does Witten owe his success to Romo?
I have not heard if robinson is over his concussion problems. Its been a few years. He owes his entire financial security to tony.And Laurent Robinson
Now this is the definition of stupid
The ole "we've lowered our standards" lament, lolIf only the great Danny White had gotten the same treatment.
We've lowered our standards!
that truly defines your intelligence
I dont remotely blame Romo for that, but I do mostly agree with you.Unfortunately I don’t see Romo getting in the HOF, not enough post season success to get in. He has nice stats, but most HOF QB at least reach a Championship game or Super Bowl.
Learn to disagree without the insults
Anderson was a 4 time passing champion
Had a career completion percentage of nearly 60. Staubach's was 57
He is an underrated but very dominant player in his era. Silly to compare totals w a guy from this era. His numbers would equate to something like: 56,000 yards, 65% completion, 390 TD in today's era.
Love it or leave it
Anderson was more dominant in his era than Romo was in his. I would put in Anderson over Aikman and Irvin.
He actually might be a top 7 QB all time.
The numbers he put up in that era are equivalent to the numbers Marino , Favre, Manning, Brees and Brady have done in recent times.
I showed you his career numbers which are lower than Romo's in every category. If you want to go purely by numbers Romo is the clear winner.
Mic drop.
You really comparing passing totals from 1 guy who played in the 70's and mid 80's vs a guy who played in the 2000's and 10's? That's a fare fight. A bum like Stafford would win that. You have to compare how dominant each was in their perspective eras. Anderson was more dominant in his.
Educate yourself:https://www.si.com/more-sports/2011/06/08/ken-anderson
Anderson would be amongst the Gods in this era
I'm talking PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.
An OpEd piece in Sports Illustrated is not EDUCATIONAL reading. Especially when its to make a case that a player is HOF material. However, I refuse to call you stupid. From an old person that's still almost as smart as pouring salt in your eyes while looking at the sun.
And Romo PLAYED LESS GAMES. But.....
We can do your way....
How about we compare Ken Anderson to Joe Montana (who would be in the top 3/4 all time), Dan Fouts (who he played in the Freezer Game...he finished his career with more than 40,000 yards), Marino (first year was in that era), and just go ahead and define what 'a real era of football' is and we can look at the numbers.
Let's educate you.
(LOL...I just read i and laughed at you again. He's running the West Coast offense? Why doesn't he have Joe Montana numbers? Hmmmm?)
Too bad he was such a loser though.Learn to disagree without the insults
Anderson was a 4 time passing champion
Had a career completion percentage of nearly 60. Staubach's was 57
He is an underrated but very dominant player in his era. Silly to compare totals w a guy from this era. His numbers would equate to something like: 56,000 yards, 65% completion, 390 TD in today's era.
Love it or leave it
When marveling at Anderson's Hall of Fame-worthy stats, it pays to remember that he spent much of his career playing in the depths of the Dead Ball Era (1970-77), when scoring hit its post-war low and quarterbacking was harder than at any time in the past 60 years.
Anderson, for example, led the NFL with an incredible 95.7 passer rating in 1974. Modern football fans might scoff at that number by today's gaudy standards. But consider that the league-wide passer rating in 1974 was a miniscule 64.2, one of the lowest league-wide ratings of the last 50 years.
Hell, Anderson might be the damn GOAT
I'm done. It's astounding the lack of understanding some have on this forum
He was nothing before Romo, and nothing after he left.
San Diego would disagree.I believe he was still solid when he left.
I was always a big Romo fan, but he's not sniffing the Hall of Fame. To get in as a QB you need all-time stat totals (total yards/total touchdowns) or championships, and Romo has neither.
Between not starting in his first couple years and time lost to injury, he couldn't get the former.
He couldn't get the latter because the Cowboys are a clown show organization headed by an old drunk who cosplays as a real GM. No amount of Johnnie Walker Blue is a substitute for being qualified.
White shouldn't have been crapped on by everyone at the time like he was. "Not being Roger ******* Staubach" doesn't make you human garbage, but Cowboys fans and the Dallas sports media acted like it did.
He has championships won against the only dynasty team of this millennium. Like it or not he's getting in.