A picture is worth a 1000 words

Status
Not open for further replies.

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,512
Reaction score
4,751
Not really. It's a nice wish, but Prescott is leaps and bounds better than Lance.
That may be the case, however, the issue is the CAP differential. Just look at Purdy and Dodds, paid peanuts enables an upgraded supporting cast. It was never a surprise that Dak succeeded with his 2016 O-Line and league leading RB.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,928
Reaction score
19,484
Argh, your usual argument of if not Dak then 'who?', you've already disregarded Lance before he's thrown a ball . We'll Lance could probably give a similar performance to what Dak gave yesterday for a fraction of the CAP.
Purdy and Dodds.
I haven't disregarded Lance. he has thrown the ball. he just didn't seem NFL ready. hesitant. couldn't read the field. struggled. so yeah, evidence says he is nto ready.
Lance couldn't come close to the performance yesterday.
Cap at this point doesn't matter. not sure about the relevance. unless you are an accountant and just care about numbers and calculating cost per completion (as if it matters).
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Triple coverage.

5844378bb3794430b0616430ab2df74f.jpg
Meaningless. Mga e was already over.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,979
Reaction score
26,559
It's not love/hate....for 3 weeks he's followed the 'book', excellent when leading, unable to step up/ carry the team when trailing.
Carrying the team is a made up phrase some dumb fan came up with. It's not a real thing.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,979
Reaction score
26,559
That may be the case, however, the issue is the CAP differential. Just look at Purdy and Dodds, paid peanuts enables an upgraded supporting cast. It was never a surprise that Dak succeeded with his 2016 O-Line and league leading RB.
You're just regurgitating old talking points.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,928
Reaction score
19,484
I think he was trying to fit it in there but made a bad throw.
it was a bad throw. but I also think the play design and personnel were wrong. if you see the play, Cooks runs the middle of the end zone. he should have been running at the back end of the endzone, thus creating more space. his route pulled three players into the same area and allowed the LB to be in the path of the pass. also, instead of cook, it should have been Lamb or Gallup. taller, with better reach. thus you throw to the back of the endzone, high and allow the WR to go get it.

bad play design. followed by bad execution.

also, I took snap shots of the play before the interceptions. three receivers were jammed into the same area on the left (with cook cutting behind the TE). the TE just went to the 2 yard line and sat there as Cook was passing behind him. which didn't force the DB to make a decision. do I follow Cook or do I follow the other receiver. nobody ran to the other end of the endzone, to create space and passing lanes. just a crappy design. Pollard stayed back (around 5 yard line), and because the TE was there right in front of him, it kept the Defenders in the same area, so Pollard wasn't an option really. if the TE would run to the other end of the endzone on the left, he either gets a one-one or Pollard can be an option to go in space against a DB, or force the DB to not follow Cook and allow cook to revise and get to the open space.

with that said, Dak got greedy. he tried to thread a needle. to a 5'10" WR. Dak should have just thrown it high and if cook couldn't get it, it would be out of the back of the endzone. one more chance.

overall, the redzone play designs were pretty bad. same as Jets game. MM has to correct that.
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,127
Reaction score
16,172
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
:laugh:My god. You'd think the game was on the line. We were down two scores with under 4 mins to go.

The game was decided long before this pick.
So youre saying you arent a "its never iver til its over" guy?:laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top