Mr.davon24
PGH Cowboy Fan
- Messages
- 261
- Reaction score
- 0
To those that say it wont happen Steelers are known for letting good players go to salvage some cap space. Kevin Green Greg Llyod.
Alexander;2918183 said:Big choice. Never was versus a Pro Bowler.
Out of curiousity, what do you see in Siavii? Do you and Wade Phillips have the same prescription?
Hostile;2917694 said:Me too. Who do they have behind him that is their Anthony Spencer to Hampton's Greg Ellis?
Alexander;2918183 said:Big choice. Never was versus a Pro Bowler.
Out of curiousity, what do you see in Siavii? Do you and Wade Phillips have the same prescription?
Randy White;2918261 said:don't pay too much attention at the age thing. NG tend to last until their late 30's. I'm not saying they should give him a long term contract with a big bonus, but Ted Washington had a long, long, long, career being a NG in the NFL. Long after being consiered a 1st round bust by the 49ers.
SLATEmosphere;2918223 said:You guys are trippin. I'd happily give up a 4th to grab him. The dude was an anchor for the best defensive team in the league. Oh and they ran a 3-4.
We have more than enough money to take on his contract year. Still have Rat play NT while shifting him over on some packages and spelling Rat. A Ratliff/Hampton duo would be disgusting. Sign him for a few years while we focus on other needs on the draft and in 2011 draft another big NT. I'm here to win now baby!!
Edit: OH and we'll still have 1st,2nd and 3rd round picks..Brandon Williams and Brewster are basically going to be drafted players in 2010.
BAT;2918299 said:If all it took was a 4th, then I would do it too. Even if it meant shifting Rat to DE (which I was never in favor of) so the best DL can play together. But trading for Hampton would mean the end of Spears. He is likely traded the following week.
Prob is that Spears is younger than Hampton, and it is likely that Cowboys do not re-sign Hampton at season's end if the price is too steep. That said, these would be NICE problems for THIS season.
SLATEmosphere;2918349 said:All valid points. But I'm looking at next years FA class for D-line and YIKES..why not resign Spears,Hatch and Hampton? We'll have money and it will buy us 2-3 years on not drafting d-lineman.
Just imagine..a Spears,Ratliff,Hampton,Olshansky,Hatch for D-line rotation for years..I'm drooling
We can go O-line with 2 of the first 3 picks and a CB with the other pick
Remember we have B-Will,Brewster coming back next year. Those guys are basically draft picks.
ABQCOWBOY;2921711 said:I'm real bias where Hampton is concerned. I'm a huge Horns fan and an even bigger Casey Hampton fan.
Couple things strike me. One, we have consistantly been run on late in the season. Two, we are going to have to beat New York late and that means stopping Jacobs up the gut and Bradshaw outside. Would help a lot if we knew we could anchor strong up the middle, late in the season.
Last two games of the season, we gave up 265 yards to Baltimore and 137 yards to Philly.
If we win either of those games, we are in the playoffs. I think it's important to be strong late on both sides of the running game.
I think he'd be worth signing if in good shape.
joseephuss;2921746 said:I don't think that Ravens game was indicative of the Cowboys run defense. A majority of those yards came on 3 plays. The long TD runs were fluke plays. They weren't bad run defense. They were just bad defense. Guys trying to do too much instead of just doing their jobs, staying in their lanes and playing good solid technique. The third long running play of that game was a fake punt. There was even a 4th play where Flacco kept it and ran for a good size gain. Bad defense, but not a true indicator of the rush defense.
I thought they stuffed the run pretty well that game and that is the type of run defense they have. They just imploded and gave up big plays. The Ravens could have run a screen and it would have popped for a big TD the way Dallas was tackling and playing at the end of that game.
The rush defense also played well against both the Giants and Steelers in the previous two games giving up 72 and 70 yards, respectively.
The Philly game was a bad game in every facet, so it is difficult to say that the rush defense let them down. Evey aspect of the team let them down in that game.
ABQCOWBOY;2921772 said:Does not change the fact that we gave up yards in two must win games on the ground Josee.
IMO, we looked tired. I can't see how bringing in a player who could play, probably the most important position in the 34, could hurt.
joseephuss;2921783 said:I agree with you on both points. They gave up yards when it was a must win, must stop situation. Hampton or any other proven NT will not hurt at all. Got no problems with that although I doubt Hampton gets released. I just don't think the run defense is as bad as it is made out to be or that the Ravens game is a good example of the run defense.
The defense just lets down from time to time whether that is from the run or the pass. They did not give up a lot of passing yards to Flacco in that Ravens game, but the yardage they did give up came during critical situations including the TD pass to Mason. Every time they looked as if they had the offense stopped they would give up a play that allowed the drive to continue.