A Touch of Hostility...Week 17

[Hostile]

What, you're not impressed?

Well, you can't blame me for bringing it back up seeing how smug and clever you thought you were - and then I nailed it -- 13-3. :laugh2:

Also, if you recall, I said I thought we'd finish "3-2 or 2-3, leaning towards 2-3". I think that was rather close. But I'm glad it ended up being on the higher side and it looks like we finally ended that late season trend.





Educated guess, yes. Not really just a shot in the dark though. That's just blindly throwing darts at a board and neglects the educated part.

And yeah, I don't think I'm the one who got played. 13-3 heh heh :laugh2:

No, I'm not impressed. Even a blind chicken gets a piece of corn now and then. And neither were you when you realized who the team was in the test case I laid out. You tried to spin control out of that. The bottom line is you really have just wanted to bag on Jerry Jones and the Cowboys for the 13 years of post season drought and had no other relevant football opinion. Hell, you needed a 13 year scenario for New Orleans just to take a wild stab at their record. In truth, it was all kind of pathetic in its impotence.

Though you can spin it differently now, and I knew you would. Why do you think I had those 3 posts already in mind? I knew last week when Nawlins lost that they would probably lose again and you would bring up that post. I keep telling you that you are transparent in this nonsense. If you choose to believe differently that is your right to be delusional.

You point blank asked me if I was saying we would finish above .500 in December and January. I said I was and would stomach 11-5. You then proceeded to mock that at every turn after the losses to New York and San Diego. Your educated guess was based upon "trends" and mine was upon being a "blind homer." Do you deny all of this now? If so, how typical.

I am not shocked. :laugh2:

 

[Bach]

No, I'm not impressed. Even a blind chicken gets a piece of corn now and then. And neither were you when you realized who the team was in the test case I laid out. You tried to spin control out of that. The bottom line is you really have just wanted to bag on Jerry Jones and the Cowboys for the 13 years of post season drought and had no other relevant football opinion. Hell, you needed a 13 year scenario for New Orleans just to take a wild stab at their record. In truth, it was all kind of pathetic in its impotence.

C'mon man. Admit it, you wet yourself after the Saints lost three in a row and you realized I had gotten it right.

And no, I didn't need a 13 year history, you just added that on your own.
Anyways, I thought it was hilarious that in order to try and justify your claims you'd have to try and find some situation where a team broke from it's trend (which I have repeatedly said trends are made to be broken). And then to top it off, you practically beg and taunt me to predict the next seasons record for them. Then when I do you though you were real clever, only I ended up nailing it. :laugh2:

Though you can spin it differently now, and I knew you would. Why do you think I had those 3 posts already in mind? I knew last week when Nawlins lost that they would probably lose again and you would bring up that post. I keep telling you that you are transparent in this nonsense. If you choose to believe differently that is your right to be delusional.

You point blank asked me if I was saying we would finish above .500 in December and January. I said I was and would stomach 11-5. You then proceeded to mock that at every turn after the losses to New York and San Diego. Your educated guess was based upon "trends" and mine was upon being a "blind homer." Do you deny all of this now? If so, how typical.

I am not shocked. :laugh2:

Of course I brought it back up. You said to see you in three weeks about it. Now you want to slough it off. Whatever, rather typical.

Anyways, it all stemmed from an innocent final 5 game prediction. And one that I said over and over I was basing it on the SCHEDULE and past trends late in the year. I said 3-2 but leaning towards 2-3. We went 3-2. No spin there and I don't see why it was ever an issue over a month ago.

 

[Joe Realist]

Ok Hostile and Bach - you guys have to cool it. The board vibe is good!! Keep it that way.

 

[zrinkill]

I am not surprised that certain people tried to take the "believe" sigs and turn it into a mocking thing for their stupid agenda's.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

This thread turned into something that is soooooo 2009....

 

[WoodysGirl]

This thread turned into something that is soooooo 2009....

No kidding


They're the yin to each other's yang.

 

[Bach]

Ok Hostile and Bach - you guys have to cool it. The board vibe is good!! Keep it that way.

Yeah Hos, stop killing the vibe, man.

 

[Hostile]

Ok Hostile and Bach - you guys have to cool it. The board vibe is good!! Keep it that way.

This thread turned into something that is soooooo 2009....

No kidding


They're the yin to each other's yang.

My apologies. When called out, I tend to respond. I was perfectly willing to let it go and have avoided his anti-Jerry posts for a week. If you notice I haven't gone looking for his posts. Bleu Star nailed it.

 

[WoodysGirl]

My apologies. When called out, I tend to respond. I was perfectly willing to let it go and have avoided his anti-Jerry posts for a week. If you notice I haven't gone looking for his posts. Bleu Star nailed it.

No need to apologize as far as I'm concerned. Some people are naturally attracted to another's posts.

Bleu is one to talk.. Last year it was him and dcfanatic. Their connection ended when T.O. was released.

I imagine yours and Bach's won't end until Stephen Jones takes over.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

Bach, I asked you in another thread last week and I didn't get a response.

At what point are you willing to change your Signature?

 

[Bach]

Bach, I asked you in another thread last week and I didn't get a response.

At what point are you willing to change your Signature?

I did respond last week. I said after we win a playoff game.

But actually, I did change it last week though.

 

[Maikeru-sama]

I did respond last week. I said after we win a playoff game.

But actually, I did change it last week though.

You know what I meant.

I guess I missed your response and get ready to change the Signature to something positive, we are winning Saturday.

 

[Bach]

You know what I meant.

I guess I missed your response and get ready to change the Signature to something positive, we are winning Saturday.

It was here.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3182335&postcount=79

And yeah, I hope to change it come Sunday.

 

[zrinkill]

You know what I meant.

I guess I missed your response and get ready to change the Signature to something positive, we are winning Saturday.

It will just be sarcastic positive.

 

[Bach]

Obviously just can't please some people.

 

[DallasEast]

It was here.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3182335&postcount=79

And yeah, I hope to change it come Sunday.

Honestly, my curiosity has been piqued towards discovering what type of imagery you would personally consider as "supportive/pro-Cowboys". Then again, I am equally curious to find out how long it would remain before being yanked in favor of 'Booger' Jones. :

 

[kmd24]

Very nice read, Hos.

I also like to give the Giants credit. They played awesome football that Off Season.

I think you probably meant Post Season there.

 

[Hostile]

Very nice read, Hos.



I think you probably meant Post Season there.

Thank you. Fixed it.

 

[Bach]

Honestly, my curiosity has been piqued towards discovering what type of imagery you would personally consider as "supportive/pro-Cowboys". Then again, I am equally curious to find out how long it would remain before being yanked in favor of 'Booger' Jones. :

Let's (or that) hope we find out :starspin

 

[DallasEast]

Let's (or that) hope we find out :starspin

:laugh1: