I don't disagree with this. I was surprised in the off season as I expected us to sign one more true LB, and we never did.
I also see weakness in our DT rotation, and the result is games like this and the Niners game, where we get gashed by a team that can run the ball (Cardinals too). The blueprint to beat us is out there.
2 very common themes you will read on this forum are 1. The Cowboys are cheap, and 2. We like our guys. Sadly, there is truth in both of those generalizations.
We have 5 DTs.
Osa is a very good player. We drafted him, great job.
Hankins is a JAG. I don't mean that in the derogatory way it is usually used. You need JAGS on your team, especially at rotational positions like DT. Hankins is a solid NFL contributor, but he is just a guy, but a guy you need.
The 3 other pieces are the issue.
Props to the team for investing a high pick in the position, finally, but Mazi has been unspectacular to say the least.
My realistic hope for him was that he would platoon with Hankins, and gradually, as the season wore on, get a higher % of the snaps. That hasn't happened. We are lost out there without Hankins. You expect a 1st round pick to contribute a lot more.
I don't dislike Gholston. He brings something different to the table as an interior pass rusher, so I can live with him as our 5th rotational DT. But for us, he is 3rd or 4th player, and he's not good enough to be a 3rd rotational DT on a playoff team.
Gallimore is a waste of space, but again, we rely on him for rotational snaps.
So we are below average at 3 of our 5 rotational pieces in the interior DL.
There were guys available that could have helped, and at reasonable cost.
I've always liked Shelby Harris. Just a solid DL. A JAG for sure, but a solid rotational piece. The Browns signed him for 3 mil, so about a mil more what Gallimore is costing us. Imagine adding him and moving on from Gallimore. Harris's PFF is currently over 80, so about OSA range. With Osa, Hankins and Harris, now you have a much better DT rotation.
But again, 1. We are cheap, and 2. We like our guys.
Now you add in what Acho correctly points out, that we have 200 lb safeties playing in place of 240 lb LBs, and what happened Sunday vs. the Bills becomes a reality. Signing LVE was a risk. He has never been the same, attacking player he was before his injury, and he was always one hit away from retirement. We gambled we could get another year from him and lost.
I've brought up Bobby Wagner (as have others). He cost a few mil more than LVE, but again, 1. We are cheap, and 2. We like our guys came into play. It didn't even have to be Wagner, just the recognition that we needed a true, attack the LOS, big true LB. We resigned LVE and checked the box, and it's now biting us in the XXX.
There were players available in the off season who would have helped.
Imagine replacing LVE and Gallimore on our roster with Wagner and Harris. Would have cost about 3 million combined, but IMO, we'd be a much better defense, and one that could stop the run.
Look, I'm a Cowboys fan. I hope we win the Super Bowl and it is possible this year, I just have this sinking fealing that the Niners will be up by 4, with 5 minutes left in the game, with the ball, and they will run it down our throats when it matters, and win the game.
Hope I'm wrong. It's irritating because it's been a weakness for so long. It's like we drafted a high pick and checked the box and we should have had a back up plan with pproven NFL players like Harris and Wagner (or others like them).