After reviewing this fiasco, can anyone tell me why Dak and Micah expect big paydays?

Brax

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
8,418
please prove me wrong.

only someone that is blind wouldn't be able to see what happened in the 1st half.
Those 2 int’s and 14 points the O gifted GB while doing nothing else the first half was the D fault they should have been better. That lost look on Daks face was the D fault. Waiting till 6 minutes left in the game to put up some garbage time stats was the D fault. I like you watched a different game than the homers watched, the stats say Dak and O were great and that’s what the homers go by those bloated garbage time stats against the second team. Old Jerry crying because the D failed and ruined the outstanding game Dak and the O had, can’t figure out how anyone could say it was the D but they do, and want to pay Dak 65 million a year and keep MM because they truly believe it was all on the D.
 

OGSixshooter

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,281
Reaction score
2,711
I disagree. MM still cannot manage a clock and timeouts, and DQ showed an inability to make adjustments in his scheme when necessary. He hasn't utilized Micah to his skill set, and on and on. Has MM done enough with Dak to correct his deficiencies? Of course blame goes all around, but there is a reason MM will be gone after this year, and a good reason why KM can't stick at a job ie. this entire franchise is a mess as I have been stating daily
Agreed...a pox on BOTH coaches honestly. MM is a reactive doofus and as much I tolerated Dan Quinn, I'll never forgive 28-3. I mean that same experience is what made Jimmy Johnson a DEMON about playing 60 minutes...as he was on the other end of Frank Reich coming back. He NEVER forgot that feeling and coached like it.

MM? LOL...same ole reactive doofus, socially awkward scoundrel.
 

Mikexike

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
1,751
Those 2 int’s and 14 points the O gifted GB while doing nothing else the first half was the D fault they should have been better. That lost look on Daks face was the D fault. Waiting till 6 minutes left in the game to put up some garbage time stats was the D fault. I like you watched a different game than the homers watched, the stats say Dak and O were great and that’s what the homers go by those bloated garbage time stats against the second team. Old Jerry crying because the D failed and ruined the outstanding game Dak and the O had, can’t figure out how anyone could say it was the D but they do, and want to pay Dak 65 million a year and keep MM because they truly believe it was all on the D.
The homers don't want the truth.

They just want to hide behind the facts that the d was garbage, no one was ready. Coaches got smoked scheme wise FO is to blame for not fielding a team... what else??

I'm also very sure GB had one of the worst secondary in the playoffs with a bum DC and what does Dak do???? yeah thats what i thought....
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,893
Reaction score
8,063
Dak received his first big payday because he was winning consistently. He had two division titles and a playoff win before he got his first big payday. We tied a franchise record with 13 wins his rookie season. We also set a franchise record with 11 straight wins that season under Dak. He was on pace for over 6000 passing yards in 2020 when he was injured. We overcame a 20 point deficit against Atlanta prior to his injury which was arguably the greatest comeback in Cowboys history. He was far better than any of those other QBs that just got paid. You guys that keep pinning our playoff losses entirely on him have an agenda against him. Don’t waste your time digging in with a long reply, I’m not going much further with this.
You totally avoided the point. But you know that.

Dak already got his first big bag based on potential, just like the other guys just did.

He hasn’t got his second bag because of his playoff failures. Whether that’s his fault or the team’s fault or somewhere in between was never discussed, only that it’s been a significant part of the reason as to why the second bag hasn’t come easy and why comparing him to these other guys is irrelevant.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,499
Reaction score
6,435
Those 2 int’s and 14 points the O gifted GB while doing nothing else the first half was the D fault they should have been better. That lost look on Daks face was the D fault. Waiting till 6 minutes left in the game to put up some garbage time stats was the D fault. I like you watched a different game than the homers watched, the stats say Dak and O were great and that’s what the homers go by those bloated garbage time stats against the second team. Old Jerry crying because the D failed and ruined the outstanding game Dak and the O had, can’t figure out how anyone could say it was the D but they do, and want to pay Dak 65 million a year and keep MM because they truly believe it was all on the D.
You forgot about the opening 7:30 minute drive for a TD.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,148
Reaction score
38,758
It’s simple supply and demand when it comes to Franchise QB’s . The bottom tier teams would love a QB who could lead them to the playoffs.

Parsons is one of the best defensive players in the league. He’ll get paid too.

Fans like the media all too often want to solely associate team success with individual greatness. Fortunately there are those who are able to distinguish the difference.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,499
Reaction score
6,435
It’s simple supply and demand when it comes to Franchise QB’s . The bottom tier teams would love a QB who could lead them to the playoffs.

Parsons is one of the best defensive players in the league. He’ll get paid too.

Fans like the media all too often want to solely associate team success with individual greatness. Fortunately there are those who are able to distinguish the difference.
I am sure CD and Parson's are going to ask for a no trade clause as well.
 

Brax

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
8,418
You forgot about the opening 7:30 minute drive for a TD.
And you are saying that if the opposition scores on the first drive the O gets a pass(not a int) and doesn’t have to play anymore, how come that really good QB couldn’t do anything the first half or most of the second half. Yeah we get it though t was all over because GB scored first, ok got ya.
 

Chasing6

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,499
Reaction score
6,435
And you are saying that if the opposition scores on the first drive the O gets a pass(not a int) and doesn’t have to play anymore, how come that really good QB couldn’t do anything the first half or most of the second half. Yeah we get it though t was all over because GB scored first, ok got ya.
When did I say that? Or do you just let pretending what other people think.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,148
Reaction score
38,758
And you are saying that if the opposition scores on the first drive the O gets a pass(not a int) and doesn’t have to play anymore, how come that really good QB couldn’t do anything the first half or most of the second half. Yeah we get it though t was all over because GB scored first, ok got ya.
No it wasn’t but it set the tone. And our offense couldn’t respond giving up turnovers which ultimately killed us.

But our defense didn’t help us either. Our defense was over rated . Played great if we had the lead with pressure.

It was a total team failure. 27-0 game over.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,148
Reaction score
38,758
Exactly. That's why GM Jethro is going to bench Dak.

What fantasy world do you live in?
Doubt that will happen .

Back in the day it did happen but you had backups who could possibly start for other teams.

Imagine in 1971 the Cowboys benched the QB who just led us to our 1st SB. Only because we had a potential great QB on the bench.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,605
Reaction score
16,378
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Doubt that will happen .

Back in the day it did happen but you had backups who could possibly start for other teams.

Imagine in 1971 the Cowboys benched the QB who just led us to our 1st SB. Only because we had a potential great QB on the bench.
Are you really taking that guy serious? He only showed up after JJ got Lance and is here to trash the hell out of him, that is his mission, nothing else. But, carry on if you like. Just saying...
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,148
Reaction score
38,758
But the Packers must have saw something in Love . Not only was it enough to let Rodgers go but they stayed with him after slow start last year.

And he begun playing his best ball down the stretch. That’s the kind of talent evaluation our front office has been missing this era
 

Brax

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
8,418
When did I say that? Or do you just let pretending what other people think.
Maybe you should clarify your posts or do purposely post that way so you can argue that you didn’t say that even though you implied it. So what was the point of your post if it wasn’t what I responded
 
Top