All-22 Christine Michael

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,711
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Has anyone studied Michael in the NFL?

There is now a Cult of Michael and I'm curious what is the driving force behind it. I don't think it is all Texas A&M fans, but it's possible.

In the All-22 you can do a search for team, year, play type and player. I did a search to see all of Michael's runs from 2014 and I also watched his 2015 preseason runs.

Keep in mind the sample size is fairly small with only 34 carries in 2014 and 32 in the 2014 preseason.

For a player that was basically free (conditional 7th) he looks reasonably good; however, he has a similar running style to Joseph Randle. They are both what I call jump-cut runners. When watching Michael, it looked like Joseph Randle gained 10 pounds, changed numbers and played for Seattle. Michael is probably a little faster but not by a huge amount. He does not have McFadden type speed on the football field.

Much like the Cowboys current runners, if the play is blocked he'll gain yards and if it's not he probably won't. Yes, he's a little more powerful than Randle but it's not an extreme difference. He does not move the pile like Marshawn Lynch or something similar to that style.

He might be a little better in terms of going to the far outside on runs than Randle but I don't see a huge difference.

He might be a better short yardage option than Randle/McFadden but he's not Marion Barber in his prime in terms of powering through people.

On one of his very best runs, he fumbled at the end.

He did not look as good in the 2015 preseason as he did in 2014.

If he is able to outperform Randle in Dallas, it will come down to vision and decision making more than a difference in physical ability. Michael and Randle both have the required physical ability but the one that makes the best decisions is the one that will likely succeed.

Overall, Michael's 2014 season was very similar to Randle's game against Atlanta. He had some big plays and then he had a lot of minimal or no gain plays with a few intermediate gains mixed in.

I did not watch him in pass blocking. There is no way to do a search on that.
 

Macnalty

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,639
Reaction score
2,162
Nice Walker, I personally do not expect to directly replace Murray without any pain, Michaels is well worth the draft pick associated with him becoming a cowboy. Hopefully pass protection is high on his talent agenda. I will be surprised if he is a difference maker in this offense similar to how I would feel about Devin Street becoming relevant to opposing defenses.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Nice job, xwalker. This is the sort of stuff that's cool about having the All22 available.
 

Howboutdemcowboys31

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,093
Reaction score
9,457
Appreciate the info. If he's faster and stronger (even if by small margins as you stated) then he should be given an opportunity once he has the playbook down
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,711
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Nice job, xwalker. This is the sort of stuff that's cool about having the All22 available.

Yes, the archive aspect of it is as great as the All-22 aspect.

In the past I would store games on the DVR until it was full. I would even get multiple DVRs from the cable company for more storage. Then I got a Tivo that allowed me to transfer the games to the computer, but then I started running out of hard drives and kept buying more of those.
 

cowboyz

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
326
yeah, he doesn't really jump off the film. do think he'll be a better short yardage runner than randle. just not mb3 or murray.

maybe a lagarette blount
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
Has anyone studied Michael in the NFL?

There is now a Cult of Michael and I'm curious what is the driving force behind it. I don't think it is all Texas A&M fans, but it's possible.

In the All-22 you can do a search for team, year, play type and player. I did a search to see all of Michael's runs from 2014 and I also watched his 2015 preseason runs.

Keep in mind the sample size is fairly small with only 34 carries in 2014 and 32 in the 2014 preseason.

For a player that was basically free (conditional 7th) he looks reasonably good; however, he has a similar running style to Joseph Randle. They are both what I call jump-cut runners. When watching Michael, it looked like Joseph Randle gained 10 pounds, changed numbers and played for Seattle. Michael is probably a little faster but not by a huge amount. He does not have McFadden type speed on the football field.

Much like the Cowboys current runners, if the play is blocked he'll gain yards and if it's not he probably won't. Yes, he's a little more powerful than Randle but it's not an extreme difference. He does not move the pile like Marshawn Lynch or something similar to that style.

He might be a little better in terms of going to the far outside on runs than Randle but I don't see a huge difference.

He might be a better short yardage option than Randle/McFadden but he's not Marion Barber in his prime in terms of powering through people.

On one of his very best runs, he fumbled at the end.

He did not look as good in the 2015 preseason as he did in 2014.

If he is able to outperform Randle in Dallas, it will come down to vision and decision making more than a difference in physical ability. Michael and Randle both have the required physical ability but the one that makes the best decisions is the one that will likely succeed.

Overall, Michael's 2014 season was very similar to Randle's game against Atlanta. He had some big plays and then he had a lot of minimal or no gain plays with a few intermediate gains mixed in.

I did not watch him in pass blocking. There is no way to do a search on that.

Go Gamecocks...

Go Christine Michael...
 

sureletsrace

Official CZ Homer
Messages
4,622
Reaction score
4,197
I must disagree. Physically, Michael is lightyears ahead of Randle.

The sample sizes we have for both running backs are too small at this point to know who has better vision.

I'd like to see Michael get 20 carries and see what he does. I'd bet he breaks 100 yards.
 

DogFace

Carharris2
Messages
13,588
Reaction score
16,088
Yes. Nice job on the review. I'm betting this proves extremely accurate.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,971
Reaction score
26,616
Has anyone studied Michael in the NFL?

There is now a Cult of Michael and I'm curious what is the driving force behind it. I don't think it is all Texas A&M fans, but it's possible.

In the All-22 you can do a search for team, year, play type and player. I did a search to see all of Michael's runs from 2014 and I also watched his 2015 preseason runs.

Keep in mind the sample size is fairly small with only 34 carries in 2014 and 32 in the 2014 preseason.

For a player that was basically free (conditional 7th) he looks reasonably good; however, he has a similar running style to Joseph Randle. They are both what I call jump-cut runners. When watching Michael, it looked like Joseph Randle gained 10 pounds, changed numbers and played for Seattle. Michael is probably a little faster but not by a huge amount. He does not have McFadden type speed on the football field.

Much like the Cowboys current runners, if the play is blocked he'll gain yards and if it's not he probably won't. Yes, he's a little more powerful than Randle but it's not an extreme difference. He does not move the pile like Marshawn Lynch or something similar to that style.

He might be a little better in terms of going to the far outside on runs than Randle but I don't see a huge difference.

He might be a better short yardage option than Randle/McFadden but he's not Marion Barber in his prime in terms of powering through people.

On one of his very best runs, he fumbled at the end.

He did not look as good in the 2015 preseason as he did in 2014.

If he is able to outperform Randle in Dallas, it will come down to vision and decision making more than a difference in physical ability. Michael and Randle both have the required physical ability but the one that makes the best decisions is the one that will likely succeed.

Overall, Michael's 2014 season was very similar to Randle's game against Atlanta. He had some big plays and then he had a lot of minimal or no gain plays with a few intermediate gains mixed in.

I did not watch him in pass blocking. There is no way to do a search on that.

Good stuff
I think the biggest part of the CM worship is more about the hate for the other guys
Many wanted Dunbar cut back in camp
Didn't want Dmac and hated not taking a RB, just any RB in the draft
You steal a guy sometimes but for the most part when you trade for a player you get what you pay for
I hope he plays great but I'm of the thought Randle and Dmac can be good if the oline creates holes and no RB can be good if they don't
 

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
I must disagree. Physically, Michael is lightyears ahead of Randle.

The sample sizes we have for both running backs are too small at this point to know who has better vision.

I'd like to see Michael get 20 carries and see what he does. I'd bet he breaks 100 yards.

Give him a chance and see what he can do !!!
 

NeonDeion21

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,500
Reaction score
1,065
Here's a reason for the Michael-cult:

Christine.jpg
 

Rogerthat12

DWAREZ
Messages
14,605
Reaction score
9,989
Nice review xwalker, limited sample but excellent work on analysis while stating the limitation.

I personally like what Randle brings, certainly he could make better decisions at times but it will be interesting to see how CM plays behind this line assuming they are playing well, once activated.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
He was drafted in the same class and tier with Eddie Lacy and Leveon Bell.

Any Cowboy fan would love to have 2 years from either of them.

Michael was completely blocked by Lynch in SEA, time to see if he can be as good as his draft stock.

If you can't have expectations and hope for a guy like him you might as well hang em up as far as being a glass half filled fan.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,649
Reaction score
31,939
OMG, folks! CMike is not all that. In Seattle he lost the backup RB job to a rookie. Why do folks think this 3rd string RB can do anything at all. He was crap in Seattle and he is crap in Dallas. I pray we never get desperate enough to allow him on the field.
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
25,729
Reaction score
30,914
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
C-Mike ran a 4.43 forty at the Indy Combine as compared to Randle's 4.63 at that event, so his 40-yd. dash speed is somewhat better at that distance. CM's explosion is generally regarded as exceptional, as his 10-yard dash speed and vertical jump indicates. At least, it'll be interesting to finally see what he can do in live action.
 
Last edited:

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
OMG, folks! CMike is not all that. In Seattle he lost the backup RB job to a rookie. Why do folks think this 3rd string RB can do anything at all. He was crap in Seattle and he is crap in Dallas. I pray we never get desperate enough to allow him on the field.

If Michael is garbage then Randle is toxic waste. Sometimes it is just a numbers game. SEA overdrafted RBs and decided to stick with the guy they paid 10m. Trying to draw conclusions from the backups is silly based on the SSS.
 

Merlin

Well-Known Member
Messages
698
Reaction score
341
OMG, folks! CMike is not all that. In Seattle he lost the backup RB job to a rookie. Why do folks think this 3rd string RB can do anything at all. He was crap in Seattle and he is crap in Dallas. I pray we never get desperate enough to allow him on the field.

I guess players have never switched teams and then lived up to their potential. Jimmy Smith had a horrible career after leaving Dallas. But he didn't.
 
Top