An MVP by any other name

[mahoneybill]

Romo is without a doubt the MVP. It's disgusting that Rogers will likely get it though largely because he is Rogers.

And stars in funny TV commercials...

 

[wilatino_98]

I rather Romo win the superbowl than an mvp!

 

[percyhoward]

Exactly. You now agree that volume matters. The only argument seems to be where to draw the line.

That's all the argument ever was, just a matter of degree. The question is how much weight to give someone for simply throwing more passes, albeit less efficiently. You'd give much more than I would, and more than the voters would if the names were reversed.

 

[Animosity]

If anyone on this team deserves to be MVP, it's Murray. Plain and simple. Romo has been doing less thanks to him.

 

[FloridaRob]

Either Rodgers or Romo is well deserving of the MVP. Both had great years.

 

[ConstantReboot]

Also don't forget Rodgers was pulled out early in games because of dominating.

Well once we started having a pretty good lead we usually just run the ball. How does that figure into the equation?

 

[CCBoy]

Well once we started having a pretty good lead we usually just run the ball. How does that figure into the equation?

Probably in the wins column.

 

[ufcrules1]

Well once we started having a pretty good lead we usually just run the ball. How does that figure into the equation?

It certainly figures in. I mean when you have the best running game in football you get a lot more one on one matchups on the outside. It makes it a lot easier on the QB.