xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,173
- Reaction score
- 64,689
The Raiders had the 2nd pick in round 3 and 3rd pick in round 5.
That's #66 and #141.
The value of those picks is equal to #60.
The Cowboys had pick 27.
27 + 32 = 59
That's almost exactly 1 round difference.
Raiders get:
Brown
#27
Raiders give up:
Cooper
Equivalent of #60
Brown is 31 and required a new contract for big money so there was no discount on his contract.
Brown was a malcontent with the Steelers.
Brown does not fit the type that ages well. He is a smallish WR with average speed (4.57 forty at the combine). When Randy Moss got older, he was still 6-4 and even if he lost a good bit of his 4.2 speed, he was still as fast or faster than many DBs. If Brown loses speed he'll look like the WR version of 2017 version of TE Jason Witten.
Cooper is 24 and had made the Pro Bowl 2 of his 3 years with the Raiders.
Cooper appears to be a "good soldier" type. That's according to reports about him in the locker-room as well as his on-field demeanor. He barely celebrates after big plays, usually just handing the ball to the ref and walking back to the huddle or sideline in somewhat of a Barry Sanders style.
Cooper is obviously a student of the game (he goes into derail on of thought process in interviews). He is also big, fast and freakishly quick.
Cooper will require a new contract but he had over 1.5 years of team control remaining before he becoming a free agent.
The Cowboys got basically a full season of value from him plus the playoffs in 2018 because once he helped them get to the playoffs, it didn't matter that he didn't play the first 7 games and the Cowboys didn't pay him for those games.
It really doesn't make sense for the Raider's.
The progress stopper concept rarely makes sense, but in this situation it might; although, more from a team development standpoint than an individual player perspective.
Their trades of Khalil Mack and Cooper were rebuilding type moves.
Long term, going all-in on a rebuild is a good way to build a great roster and the picks they received could be a mini-Hershel Walker type catalyst for them.
What is the point to acquiring a 31 year old WR giving up picks and big cap space?
It seems that they'll target a QB at pick #4.
Maybe they wanted WR Brown to help the new QB succeed but Brown clashed with his last QB.
A top notch OLine helps a young QB more than anything.
They had Cooper who seems to be a "QB friendly" type WR.
Personally in the Raiders situation I would want to horde picks and horde cap space to avoid cap hits in future years when they start to ascend and want to add free agents and later pay all of the players they've drafted.
If free agency had been in place back in 1989, would it have made any sense after the Hershel Walker trade for Jimmy to then trade for Jerry Rice and give him a huge contract extension?
Jimmy traded for Haley before the 92 season at which point Jimmy had the rest of his core in place and the team was clearly on the ascent.
That's #66 and #141.
The value of those picks is equal to #60.
The Cowboys had pick 27.
27 + 32 = 59
That's almost exactly 1 round difference.
Raiders get:
Brown
#27
Raiders give up:
Cooper
Equivalent of #60
Brown is 31 and required a new contract for big money so there was no discount on his contract.
Brown was a malcontent with the Steelers.
Brown does not fit the type that ages well. He is a smallish WR with average speed (4.57 forty at the combine). When Randy Moss got older, he was still 6-4 and even if he lost a good bit of his 4.2 speed, he was still as fast or faster than many DBs. If Brown loses speed he'll look like the WR version of 2017 version of TE Jason Witten.
Cooper is 24 and had made the Pro Bowl 2 of his 3 years with the Raiders.
Cooper appears to be a "good soldier" type. That's according to reports about him in the locker-room as well as his on-field demeanor. He barely celebrates after big plays, usually just handing the ball to the ref and walking back to the huddle or sideline in somewhat of a Barry Sanders style.
Cooper is obviously a student of the game (he goes into derail on of thought process in interviews). He is also big, fast and freakishly quick.
Cooper will require a new contract but he had over 1.5 years of team control remaining before he becoming a free agent.
The Cowboys got basically a full season of value from him plus the playoffs in 2018 because once he helped them get to the playoffs, it didn't matter that he didn't play the first 7 games and the Cowboys didn't pay him for those games.
It really doesn't make sense for the Raider's.
The progress stopper concept rarely makes sense, but in this situation it might; although, more from a team development standpoint than an individual player perspective.
Their trades of Khalil Mack and Cooper were rebuilding type moves.
Long term, going all-in on a rebuild is a good way to build a great roster and the picks they received could be a mini-Hershel Walker type catalyst for them.
What is the point to acquiring a 31 year old WR giving up picks and big cap space?
It seems that they'll target a QB at pick #4.
Maybe they wanted WR Brown to help the new QB succeed but Brown clashed with his last QB.
A top notch OLine helps a young QB more than anything.
They had Cooper who seems to be a "QB friendly" type WR.
Personally in the Raiders situation I would want to horde picks and horde cap space to avoid cap hits in future years when they start to ascend and want to add free agents and later pay all of the players they've drafted.
If free agency had been in place back in 1989, would it have made any sense after the Hershel Walker trade for Jimmy to then trade for Jerry Rice and give him a huge contract extension?
Jimmy traded for Haley before the 92 season at which point Jimmy had the rest of his core in place and the team was clearly on the ascent.