Analyzing the roster (offense)

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
Quarterback
STARTER
Tony Romo
BACKUPS Brooks Bollinger, Brad Johnson
ANALYSIS I really can’t believe some Dallas fans think we should replace Romo. Yes, he sometimes frustrates with his decision-making, but we tend to let his mistakes cloud the big picture of him being one of the better QBs in the league. His career QB rating is 94.7. He completes almost 64 percent of his passes and is almost 2-1 on TD-to-int. ratio (would like that to be better, of course). Plus, how much were his numbers/play this year affected by his injuries? He needs to mature some, especially in his decision-making, but Dallas’ best shot at returning to the Super Bowl rests with Romo. The real question is who does Dallas get to be the No. 2 guy. Johnson should not be retained for any reason after he showed us exactly what we feared about him ... that his skills are gone. Bollinger didn’t show much more, but I’m afraid Dallas might retain him as the No. 2, then draft someone to groom for that role. The Cowboys definitely need to spend a second-day pick on the position, but they also need to look for a better veteran option than either one they currently have.
DRAFT PRIORITY Middle to late round

Fullback
STARTER
Deon Anderson
BACKUP Julius Crosslin
ANALYSIS I wasn’t necessarily disappointed in Anderson’s play, but I was disappointed in how Dallas used him. I had hope based on the preseason that the Cowboys would hand off and pass to him some to establish the position as more than just a blocking threat. Maybe that was because the Cowboys didn’t trust Anderson in those other roles, but keeping the position one-dimensional certainly didn’t help the offense. If they are not going to use the position better, then the Cowboys need to look at their alternatives (see tight end analysis). Crosslin spent the season on the practice squad, but I didn’t think he showed enough in the preseason to even deserve that spot.
DRAFT PRIORITY Late round to UDFA

Running back
STARTER
Marion Barber III
BACKUPS Felix Jones, Tashard Choice, Alonzo Coleman
ANALYSIS Barber’s barbaric, unpredictable running style is one of the things that makes him great, but it also hurts Dallas at times (perhaps too many times in 2008) when he leaves his blockers too early. Jones and Choice were more effective cutting off blocks instead of cutting away from them like Barber (part of their effectiveness has to be credited to being backups, though). However, what Dallas missed when Barber got hurt was his energy. Barber’s relentlessness and excitedness appear to charge up the team. He needs to learn when to go with his gut and when to trust his blockers to be a better running back, but we can't undervalue the on-field personality he gives the offense. Based on the play of his backups, the Cowboys need to spend time trying to figure out the right mix for using all three backs. There needs to be some consideration for what each player does best and even how they can be used in combination. I really want to see us do something with Jones in the slot. I think Dallas failed to take advantage of his big-play ability there. We missed that ability when he got hurt and need to make sure we give him several chances each game to use it. To truly use him like I think we should, I think he should sub in on every drive for a play or two. Choice, who appears to be the best of the three at not improvising, should be used more as a regular substitute, spelling Barber for at least a couple of series. These are three good backs, each with different strengths that we need to take advantage of. Coleman didn’t show he belongs in their company, and I was somewhat disappointed that we kept him around on the practice squad after a disappointing preseason.
DRAFT PRIORITY UDFA

Tight end
STARTER
Jason Witten
BACKUPS Martellus Bennett, Tony Curtis, Rodney Hannah
ANALYSIS Witten proved once again how much of a warrior he is and why he is Romo’s favorite target ... he's reliable in all that he does. I do think his injuries affected his play more than we know, but he still shined on offense as a receiver and blocker. The most consistent player we have on offense. Bennett’s play as rookie, even though it was up and down some, is the primary reason I want Dallas to switch to using mostly two-tight end sets. You can see his power as a blocker (more than Witten’s) when he gets his assignment right and he’s a natural as a receiver, showing a surprising ability to get upfield after the catch. I’ve never been completely satisfied with the blocking out of the backfield by tight ends, but I think the tradeoff is worth it because defenses have to account for the receiving abilities of our two tight ends. Curtis was supposed to be that second threat from the position, but failed to seize the role. I thought he had it in him, but he faded away after showing promise the previous season. I have no problem with Dallas losing him as a restricted free agent and replacing him with Hannah, who was the second-best TE on the roster in the preseason, at least as a receiver.
DRAFT PRIORITY Late round to UDFA

Wide receiver
STARTERS
Terrell Owens, Roy Williams
BACKUPS Patrick Crayton, Miles Austin, Sam Hurd, Isaiah Stanback, Paris Warren, Travis Wilson
ANALYSIS I’m not among those who want to see Owens go. What I would rather see is Jerry Jones sit down with him and tell him the way its going to be, what he expects and needs from him (no speaking out publicly against any member of the coaching staff or teammate) and if Owens can’t handle that, then he can pack his bags. Owens needs parameters, and Dallas didn’t seem to give him any last year ... that’s on the coaching staff. I also don’t believe that Owens’ abilities slipped last year, at least not much. There are few receivers teams can’t nullify if they can make them the focus. Teams made Owens the focus, shading coverage his way enough to force Romo look for other options (even when the coverage actually ended up being 1-on-1) and the other options didn’t come through consistently enough to make teams pay for doing that. Figuring out how to change that has to be the No. 1 goal of coordinator Jason Garrett this offseason. Dallas hoped to solve it by trading for Williams, but the Cowboys couldn’t take advantage of his skills, partly because Romo didn’t have time to build a trust for Williams’ ability to catch the ball in tight coverage. Those two need to get on the same page this offseason, and Garrett needs to study how best to deploy Williams. When Williams was acquired, Crayton returned to a role that was better suited for him, third receiver. When matched up against backup corners, Crayton can take full advantage of his hands, route-running and physicality. However, the one thing Crayton can’t do is stretch the field and that’s where Dallas needs Austin on the field. If not for injury, Austin might have supplanted Crayton because he showed an ability to be a big-play receiver. His improved play makes him a priority for Dallas to keep, with at least a second-round restricted free agent tender. It’s possible that Austin has reached his peak, but if so, his peak at least can fill a nice niche for Dallas. Hurd is also a restricted free agent, and would be a good player to retain because of his special teams ability and what he has shown in the past as a possession receiver. I wouldn’t count him out of the No. 3 role. Stanback’s health issues might keep us from ever seeing exactly how good he can be. He has flashed great athletic ability (speed, size, moves, hands), but his injuries keep holding him back from seeing if he can put it all together. Warren and Wilson have NFL experience, but I don’t think they can beat out the other players at this position.
DRAFT PRIORITY Depends ... if we retain Owens and Austin, late round to UDFA; if we lose Owens, early round (although I think we would replace him in free agency); if we lose Austin, middle to late round

Center
STARTER
Andre Gurode
BACKUP Cory Proctor
ANALYSIS Despite some shortcomings, Gurode is one of the best centers in the league. He rarely gets overpowered and can drive his man off the ball. He does hurt us some with his poor Shotgun snaps and his lack of great mobility, but I think it’s a tradeoff for what he does well. He’s not a weak link in the line. His backup is. Proctor didn’t get an opportunity to show what he can do in the regular season this year at the center spot (saw enough the previous year, though), but his play at guard showed that Dallas needs to look elsewhere for a backup. Proctor was targeted as the weak link because he was easily overpowered. He’s good at pulling and taking on linebackers, but defensive linemen treated him like a ragdoll and turnstile, and it affected the play of the entire left side. Proctor is a restricted free agent, and I could live with Dallas not offering him a tender at all, but wouldn’t be surprised if the Cowboys give him one as the only other real center on the roster, then bring in competition to beat him out.
DRAFT PRIORITY Early to middle round

Guard
STARTERS
Leonard Davis, Kyle Kosier
BACKUPS Joe Berger, Montrae Holland, Ryan Gibbons
ANALYSIS You can count me among those who didn’t really appreciate Kosier until we didn’t have him. There was a distinct difference in how this line played with and without Kosier, and he was definitely missed. Now, I still think he’s weaker than what you’d like at the position, and a player you’re always going to be looking to replace, but at least he can hold his ground most of the time and is great on the move. Perhaps the player with the ability to replace him is Holland, if Holland will get into shape. Holland doesn’t have good movement skills, but looked pretty good in the limited time we saw him because he doesn’t give ground, takes up a lot of space and can get a push. He fits in well with this power line, but his commitment has to be questioned. Berger is definitely not the answer and will leave in free agency. The guy who needed to be the player to replace Kosier disappointed in that attempt, not even being able to beat out Proctor. I don’t hold out much hope for Gibbons being able to step in either, so it’s either Kosier or Holland on the left side with no other viable backups at guard or center. Davis has the other side locked up, but like Holland, his lack of good movement skills hurts him at times, more this season than the previous one. He has to watch overcommiting, being overagressive and letting defenders get around him because he doesn't have to movement skills to recover.
DRAFT PRIORITY Early to middle round

Tackle
STARTERS
Flozell Adams, Marc Colombo
BACKUPS Doug Free, Pat McQuistan
ANALYSIS I understand, somewhat, what happened to Adams in 2008. He is a distractible player and the play next to him clearly affected his game. He also has some injuries that affected his game. But I don’t know if those things are enough to explain his inconsistent play (some would say it was consistent ... consistently bad). He just looked out of sync all season, almost like his heart wasn’t into putting in the effort necessary to keep up with the speed rushers (which has always been a struggle for him) ... and he looked the same way in the Pro Bowl, which makes me wonder about my reasons for his drop in play. I want to see how he plays with Kosier back next to him, though, before considering that he might be through. We do have to get Free ready, though, because it is a possibility. Free’s play was up and down in the preseason, and he got beat more than I expected. But I do see some encouraging signs that he could be the replacement. McQuistan didn’t show those encouraging signs, taking a step back in his development to the point that I no longer know if he can be counted on. In the preseason, it was almost like he just lost his technique. Instead, it seemed he would anticipate a defender’s move, then be out of position to counter the actual move. Maybe his feet just aren’t that good despite him getting praised for his athleticism. Colombo got a new contract at the end of the season, and deservedly so. He is not near the most athletic lineman on the team, but he is the most solid. He plays with great technique and to the whistle (sometimes beyond it). I love players who are clearly giving their all on each and every play, and Colombo is the kind who clearly hates to lose and plays all out on every play, even if he has to sacrifice his body to make a block.
DRAFT PRIORITY Middle to late round
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
If we do not get this O-line fixed we are going no where....

Davis's lateral movement was not what it was a year ago and he got beat often by guys who did not try to overpower him but got a great first step off the ball...

Gurode goes to sleep or something out there...whatever it is...it needs to stop...but when he is "there" so to speak he can be dominating...

Proctor is awful...Holland or Kosier are better but I wouldn't mind seeing Kosier getting some snaps at center and Gurode some at guard

Flo makes me crazy and I would never have resigned him as he takes it far too easy...He could be such a dominating player if he had just a little bit of self initiative and drive

Columbo definitely brings some needed attitude but his lateral movement is awful at times and he gets caught leaning (trying to take the inside lane away) that he gets beat to the outside...the whole line took a step back as they just didn't seem to be in the shape they were the year before
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,985
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Quarterback
Tony Romo – I agree with the assessment, but it should also be noted that Jerry Jones has made a franchise level investment in him, so it really doesn’t matter what fans think about him for the next several years. That doesn’t mean that he wouldn’t necessarily be benched during that time, but it does mean that the likelihood of him being released or traded from the team is virtually nonexistent.
Brooks Bollinger – Agree.
Brad Johnson – Agree. The blame for Johnson’s ineffectiveness during Romo’s absence cannot be laid completely at his feet, but Johnson didn’t excel at all when the team needed him most. With Bollinger’s acquisition, keeping Johnson is no longer a necessity.
DRAFT PRIORITY – Agree.

Fullback
Deon Anderson – Agree.
Julius Crosslin – Agree.
DRAFT PRIORITY – Partially agree. Should the team commit to leaning on the run more heavily in ’09, I can see a mid-to-late round selection at the position and avoid the possibility of being forced to acquire suitable talent via an undrafted free agent.

Running back
Marion Barber III – Agree.
Felix Jones – Slightly disagree. Jones can excel by playing in the slot, but his limited opportunities as a substitute of designated rushing plays shouldn’t also be decreased because of his versatility.
Tashard Choice – Agree.
Alonzo Coleman – Agree.
DRAFT PRIORITY – Slightly disagree. I believe that we have solid depth now, but adding training camp competition is never a bad thing either.

Tight end
Jason Witten – Agree.
Martellus Bennett – Agree.
Tony Curtis – Strongly agree, but I’m willing to wait-and-see if Curtis can solidify his stance at the position because of the inconsistence which the offense displayed during much of the season.
Rodney Hannah – Agree.
DRAFT PRIORITY – Agree.

Wide receiver
Terrell Owens – Disagree. On another team with fewer offensive weapons, Owens should be automatically designated as the number one option on every offensive play. However, that’s not the case in Dallas and offensive game planning should be adjusted accordingly. The quality of plays to fully utilized Owens’ skills as a playmaker should be a priority since he can be deadly if used properly, but the quantity of plays highlighting him should be minimized to ensure overall balance. In addition, he will dictate his personal dedication both on and off the field as he has done throughout his career. Jerry Jones or anyone else with (seemingly) influence can talk to him until they have rendered themselves hoarse, but Owens obeys Owens and no one but Owens.
Roy Williams – Agree. Additionally, Jerry Jones has hedged the #1 position’s future on Williams’ shoulders. In my opinion, Williams’ mid-season acquisition will play a strong part in the team’s drafting philosophy in two months.
Patrick Crayton – Strongly agree.
Miles Austin – Agree.
Sam Hurd – Agree.
Isaiah Stanback – Strongly agree.
Paris Warren – Agree.
Travis Wilson – Agree.
DRAFT PRIORITY - Slightly agree. Regardless of the situation, I would recommend drafting in the mid-to-late rounds at the position.

Center
Andre Gurode – Agree.
Cory Proctor – Agree.
DRAFT PRIORITY – Strongly disagree. The highest priority for the offensive line should be offensive tackle in my opinion. With good drafting, a strong center or guard candidate could be obtained in the mid-to-late rounds or (in this case) through free agency.

Guard
Leonard Davis – Agree.
Kyle Kosier – Agree.
Joe Berger – STRONGLY agree.
Montrae Holland – Agree, but his size also makes me very apprehensive that he can keep himself in shape to fortify himself against injuries for an entire season.
Ryan Gibbons – Agree.
DRAFT PRIORITY – Again, strongly disagree. The highest priority for the offensive line should be offensive tackle in my opinion. With good drafting, a strong center or guard candidate could be obtained in the mid-to-late rounds or (in this case) through free agency.

Tackle
Flozell Adams – Agree, but would like to add that Adams didn’t seem to be 100% healthy for much of the season and was battling injuries which he wasn’t able to fully overcome.
Marc Colombo – Strongly agree.
Doug Free – Agree.
Pat McQuistan – Agree.
DRAFT PRIORITY – Again, strongly disagree. The highest priority for the offensive line should be offensive tackle in my opinion. We need to get younger at left tackle now, not later, with the best available candidate afforded to our draft position as conveniently possible. Jerry Jones has seemingly made a long-term franchise investment at quarterback. It’s time that he does the same by protecting Romo’s backside for years to come.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Zaxor;2637028 said:
If we do not get this O-line fixed we are going no where....

Davis's lateral movement was not what it was a year ago and he got beat often by guys who did not try to overpower him but got a great first step off the ball...

Gurode goes to sleep or something out there...whatever it is...it needs to stop...but when he is "there" so to speak he can be dominating...

Proctor is awful...Holland or Kosier are better but I wouldn't mind seeing Kosier getting some snaps at center and Gurode some at guard

Flo makes me crazy and I would never have resigned him as he takes it far too easy...He could be such a dominating player if he had just a little bit of self initiative and drive

Columbo definitely brings some needed attitude but his lateral movement is awful at times and he gets caught leaning (trying to take the inside lane away) that he gets beat to the outside...the whole line took a step back as they just didn't seem to be in the shape they were the year before

we HAVE to draft a quality C, and move Gurode to LG

he's just too stupid to be calling the shots, and OG was his projected position anyways

the fact that we wanted Hawaii C Samson Satele a couple years ago makes me think Dallas has been leaning the same way

this draft is chock-full of quality centers, we need to get us one
 

Dhragon

Deadly Claws of Death
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
1,308
iRoot4Losers;2637400 said:
we HAVE to draft a quality C, and move Gurode to LG

he's just too stupid to be calling the shots, and OG was his projected position anyways

the fact that we wanted Hawaii C Samson Satele a couple years ago makes me think Dallas has been leaning the same way

this draft is chock-full of quality centers, we need to get us one


Parcells tried Gurode at guard for a long while. He was awful at that position. It was only when Bill put him at Center that he became at all decent.

So enough talk about moving him to guard people. He might not have been quite as bad as Proctor at guard but that is not saying much.
 

Yoshimitsu

Lurch
Messages
4,382
Reaction score
4,332
On offense the O-Line has to be addressed.

I agree with iRoot4Losers.

The most under looked thing with our O-Line is how dumb Gurode is. Really just watch the game and look how he makes all the wrong calls. The center has input in the protections calls just like the QB.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Dhragon;2637411 said:
Parcells tried Gurode at guard for a long while. He was awful at that position. It was only when Bill put him at Center that he became at all decent.

So enough talk about moving him to guard people. He might not have been quite as bad as Proctor at guard but that is not saying much.

he's too stupid to remain at C

our Oline will always be just names with him as the remaining C
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Fixing the oline, in my opinion, has more to do with coaching than talent. There are plenty of teams in the NFL with worse talent that produce better than our guys. Until we get a staff in place that can coach them up, I have a feeling we're in for quite a few more dissapointing seasons.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Center and Tackle should be addressed in the draft, those are the top offensive priorities next to finding a decent back up QB. We need to find Flo's replacement now...
 

Yoshimitsu

Lurch
Messages
4,382
Reaction score
4,332
The bad thing about the offensive line is we have some terrible contracts.

The contract that Flo has is the worst.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
TheCount;2637422 said:
Fixing the oline, in my opinion, has more to do with coaching than talent. There are plenty of teams in the NFL with worse talent that produce better than our guys. Until we get a staff in place that can coach them up, I have a feeling we're in for quite a few more dissapointing seasons.

Hudson Houck had no problem coaching that San Diego and Miami line, the coaching is fine, the C isn't
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
I think we need a new FB Anderson sucks and is the reason why Romo got his hurt. Curtis needs to be cut also. Same goes fro Proctor. I don't understand how people have the audacity to say that we don't need a WR. That's pretty laughable to me. If Gurode can't play C I'd rather not move him to guard maybe trade him but moving him to guard won't be an upgrade to what we already have. OT is needed more than Gurode because Holland and Koiser have been decent if not better and actually have started in this league.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Yoshimitsu;2637428 said:
The bad thing about the offensive line is we have some terrible contracts.

The contract that Flo has is the worst.
Don't be so quick to hate Flo.

If we charted Flo's performance over his career I suspect it would look like a series of mountains, peak then valley, peak then valley, etc. That's what you get from Flo. He was unbelievably good in 2007, and then he struggled in 2008 with a broken hand and a broken LG.

Get ready for another peak.

OTOH, if we chart Gurode, you will see a valley, suddenly interrupted by a contract year combined with a facestomp.

That's where our problems start along the offensive line, IMO.
 

dogunwo

Franchise Tagged
Messages
10,320
Reaction score
5,700
superpunk;2637447 said:
Don't be so quick to hate Flo.

If we charted Flo's performance over his career I suspect it would look like a series of mountains, peak then valley, peak then valley, etc. That's what you get from Flo. He was unbelievably good in 2007, and then he struggled in 2008 with a broken hand and a broken LG.

Get ready for another peak.

OTOH, if we chart Gurode, you will see a valley, suddenly interrupted by a contract year combined with a facestomp.

That's where our problems start along the offensive line, IMO.
I think Kosier is the most consistent, but by far the least talented. We need an upgrade.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
Zaxor;2637028 said:
If we do not get this O-line fixed we are going no where....

Davis's lateral movement was not what it was a year ago and he got beat often by guys who did not try to overpower him but got a great first step off the ball...

Gurode goes to sleep or something out there...whatever it is...it needs to stop...but when he is "there" so to speak he can be dominating...

Proctor is awful...Holland or Kosier are better but I wouldn't mind seeing Kosier getting some snaps at center and Gurode some at guard

Flo makes me crazy and I would never have resigned him as he takes it far too easy...He could be such a dominating player if he had just a little bit of self initiative and drive

Columbo definitely brings some needed attitude but his lateral movement is awful at times and he gets caught leaning (trying to take the inside lane away) that he gets beat to the outside...the whole line took a step back as they just didn't seem to be in the shape they were the year before

This line overall does not have great mobility, and that's the weakness of it. Teams with speed can give Dallas trouble, except with Kosier and Proctor.

Dallas overcomes that by being able to overpower defensive lines, but even that didn't work as well this past year because Proctor could be overpowered. Break one link and the chain falls apart.

I believe because the other members of the line are power players, we need another power player at the left guard spot. Then we play to our strengths and try to hide our weakness. But I'm OK with Kosier continuing to start after watching what an alternative to that might be. I'd still look for a better option there, but just getting Kosier back will help a lot.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
DallasEast;2637262 said:
Wide receiver
Terrell Owens – Disagree. On another team with fewer offensive weapons, Owens should be automatically designated as the number one option on every offensive play. However, that’s not the case in Dallas and offensive game planning should be adjusted accordingly. The quality of plays to fully utilized Owens’ skills as a playmaker should be a priority since he can be deadly if used properly, but the quantity of plays highlighting him should be minimized to ensure overall balance. In addition, he will dictate his personal dedication both on and off the field as he has done throughout his career. Jerry Jones or anyone else with (seemingly) influence can talk to him until they have rendered themselves hoarse, but Owens obeys Owens and no one but Owens.


I'm not sure we really disagree here. I agree that we need to use Owens properly, and the only way to do that is establish other threats on offense. If defenses cannot shade coverage Owens' way because they'll get burned by 1-on-1 coverage elsewhere, then Owens gets back to being effective. If we cannot show we can move down the field without Owens, then teams have no reason to cover him any differently than they did in 2008. Balance is definitely necessary.

As far as his personal dediction goes, I have no problem with that. Everything shows Owens to be a hard worker who hates to lose. And I think that's where the main problem comes from, when we lose, Owens can't contain his frustration. He doesn't understand how a team with him on it could lose, and reasons that the only way that could happen is if the team isn't using him properly.

Two years ago, he was an almost ideal teammate. In 2008, he got upset and voiced it. The difference? We rarely lost two years ago.

Reminding Owens of that, and his behavior, could get him back on track to how he was in 2007. Doesn't mean it will hold if things go sour in 2009, but if Dallas can heal over any wounds, then all we have to do is win to keep Owens singing happy tunes and crying about the treatment of his quarterback.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
Yoshimitsu;2637414 said:
On offense the O-Line has to be addressed.

I agree with iRoot4Losers.

The most under looked thing with our O-Line is how dumb Gurode is. Really just watch the game and look how he makes all the wrong calls. The center has input in the protections calls just like the QB.

Actually, I believe Gurode is considered to be pretty smart. I could be wrong, but I don't see all the wrong calls you are talking about, and I am sure more would be made of it if he was constantly making the wrong calls. What I see is players being beaten by the man they are supposed to block. Not much Gurode can do about that.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
TheCount;2637422 said:
Fixing the oline, in my opinion, has more to do with coaching than talent. There are plenty of teams in the NFL with worse talent that produce better than our guys. Until we get a staff in place that can coach them up, I have a feeling we're in for quite a few more dissapointing seasons.

I was amazed at the regression of some players, particularly Adams, Free and McQuistan, under Houck, but I really think that the play of the line had less to do with coaching or overall personnel than it did not being able to adequately replace Kosier.

The offensive line is the one unit most affected by one player not carrying out his assignment. That can cause the others to try to do too much or hesitate and the whole thing falls apart.

It's sad that we didn't have anybody capable of stepping in and keeping the line going. Parcells did a lot right in Dallas personnelwise, but did a really poor job of stocking our line. The only backup worth keeping seems to be Free, and even he wasn't very impressive in the preseason.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,985
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
gimmesix;2638061 said:
I'm not sure we really disagree here. I agree that we need to use Owens properly, and the only way to do that is establish other threats on offense. If defenses cannot shade coverage Owens' way because they'll get burned by 1-on-1 coverage elsewhere, then Owens gets back to being effective. If we cannot show we can move down the field without Owens, then teams have no reason to cover him any differently than they did in 2008. Balance is definitely necessary.

As far as his personal dediction goes, I have no problem with that. Everything shows Owens to be a hard worker who hates to lose. And I think that's where the main problem comes from, when we lose, Owens can't contain his frustration. He doesn't understand how a team with him on it could lose, and reasons that the only way that could happen is if the team isn't using him properly.

Two years ago, he was an almost ideal teammate. In 2008, he got upset and voiced it. The difference? We rarely lost two years ago.

Reminding Owens of that, and his behavior, could get him back on track to how he was in 2007. Doesn't mean it will hold if things go sour in 2009, but if Dallas can heal over any wounds, then all we have to do is win to keep Owens singing happy tunes and crying about the treatment of his quarterback.
Owens is never "on track". Sometimes, he just doesn't straddle the tracks of an oncoming train which is barreling down on him.

Owens is going to be Owens. That's a 24/7 preoccupation of his. No one can stop him from being himself.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,008
Reaction score
37,150
DallasEast;2638081 said:
Owens is never "on track". Sometimes, he just doesn't straddle the tracks of an oncoming train which is barreling down on him.

Owens is going to be Owens. That's a 24/7 preoccupation of his. No one can stop him from being himself.

So if Owens was Owens in 2007, was it a bad thing?

We just need to win and he'll find his happy place. But I still think this management needs to re-explain its expectations of him to him, just to give him a reminder of how things need to be.
 
Top