And with the first pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Dallas Cowboys select..

[Chocolate Lab]

At this point it doesn't even matter what I was saying....because you aren't getting it. You really aren't even close. Kind of sad, really. It's like I've stumbled into the "Meth Zone" or something.

:laugh2:

 

[SDogo]

Why isn't this in the draft zone?

Because if it was certain people dont even know where that is at but find the need to debate the issue here.

 

[AKATheRake]

QB

Sorry but if we have the 1st pick you have to take the opportunity to grab a franchise QB when there is no top 5 talent in a area of need.

I agree, top 5 pick either LT or Franchise QB for this team. Free can go back to the right side and we solidify both of our bookends. Keep Gurode and let go of the rest. The draft and FA for some guards/centers and backup tackles.

 

[tomson75]

Why isn't this in the draft zone?

It shouldn't even be in there....it should be printed and handed to human behavioral scientists for study.

 

[SilverStarCowboy]

So if we spend a 1st on a non-oline position, then that means that the oline is neglected? There are other picks besides the 1st round.

Nope, it means the entire team was neglected.

 

[NyGiantz]

Cowboys aren't getting the number one pick, unless they trade for it. At some point they will pick it up and win some games. Probably something like 7-9

 

[CanuckCowboysFan]

I enjoy going to college while you rot at your factory job.

Why are you so concerned about drafting a position where the rest of the league will be accepting? We dont need a QB. We need a olineman, safety or mlb. It is hard to trade out of the first pick; so we should just hang our heads and take a qb? Who cares what the norm is at first pick. We need what we need. If we have the first pick we shouldnt ***** out.

actually I'm currently attending the University of Washington St, nice try though.
I agree that we don't need a QB. Which is why I said not to draft Luck first overall. I also understand that we need a olineman, a safety, or a MLB. We also need a corner. So why reach and take a olineman, safety, or MLB first overall when theres noone worthy of going 1st overall at those positions, and take a guy like Patrick Peterson, a CB when he IS worthy of going there? Thats my whole thing here. I was never for drafting a QB. But No MLB, Olineman, or Safety is worthy of going 1st overall, and there is a corner who is.

 

[locked&loaded]

Name a prospect at RT, RG, S or Center that is worthy of the #1 selection.

Simple question

Its not simple, but you are simple minded.
I already told you dim witted posters that no one knows who is going to come into their own by the end of the season. Who will be healthy, who will declare and who will prove themselves in the combine and senior bowl. Draft experts cant name who will be picked an hour before the draft, I am not nearly invested yet to say who I want to pick. It isnt clear.

The only thing that is clear is what the cowboys need. So when that day comes we should pick the best player for what we NEED. Is that hard?

 

[SDogo]

Pouncy - C 18
Nic Mangold - C 29
Ben Grubbs G 29
Davin Joseph G - 23
Chris Spencer C - 26
L Mankins G -32
A Mack C - 21
E Wod C 28

How many of those would you consider worthy of a 1st round pick looking back and seriously, that sample size over how many years and how many 1st round selections?

I mean really you just made my argument.

 

[SDogo]

Its not simple, but you are simple minded.
I already told you dim witted posters that no one knows who is going to come into their own by the end of the season. Who will be healthy, who will declare and who will prove themselves in the combine and senior bowl. Draft experts cant name who will be picked an hour before the draft, I am not nearly invested yet to say who I want to pick. It isnt clear.

The only thing that is clear is what the cowboys need. So when that day comes we should pick the best player for what we NEED. Is that hard?

duck, dodge, avoid..............good job

It also shows how very little you know about the draft process.

 

[CanuckCowboysFan]

Name a prospect at RT, RG, S or Center that is worthy of the #1 selection.

Simple question

Don't bother. I asked him the same question and he just ignores it.

 

[SDogo]

Cowboys aren't getting the number one pick, unless they trade for it. At some point they will pick it up and win some games. Probably something like 7-9

This is the most incorrect post from this whole thread.

How the hell did you do it?

 

[Ren]

Romo scrambling for his life made the oline look good.

well there something we can agree on then

We ignored it thinking we where set to draft "wow" players for right now and look where it got us. You have to look more then a few years down the road or you end up where we are now.

If you have a 30+ QB and you get a chance to draft a franchise QB for the future you take it.

 

[SDogo]

Don't bother. I asked him the same question and he just ignores it.

He did again...........

 

[tomson75]

Cowboys aren't getting the number one pick, unless they trade for it. At some point they will pick it up and win some games. Probably something like 7-9

Probably...although I'd guess more like 5-6 games now that Romo is out.

....but please, don't interrupt this thread with rational thinking. We're getting the FIRST PICK OF THE DRAFT!!!ii!!1! Don't deny it!!! WHO DO WE PICK???CC?C?Cc JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!!! BUT ONLY IF YOU AGREE WITH ME!!!11!!!!

 

[Cover 2]

Nope, it means the entire team was neglected.

Romo's got 3-4 years left at his current level of play IMO. Draft Luck now and sit him on the bench. Then when Romo starts to decline you start Luck, and trade Romo off. If you're lucky you can get a couple of 2nd round picks. Romo is my favorite player, but IMO this is what would be best for the team.

Luck 1st overall, and then Wisneiski (c/g) in the 2nd, and go oline for the rest of the draft as far as I care.

 

[locked&loaded]

actually I'm currently attending the University of Washington St, nice try though.
I agree that we don't need a QB. Which is why I said not to draft Luck first overall. I also understand that we need a olineman, a safety, or a MLB. We also need a corner. So why reach and take a olineman, safety, or MLB first overall when theres noone worthy of going 1st overall at those positions, and take a guy like Patrick Peterson, a CB when he IS worthy of going there? Thats my whole thing here. I was never for drafting a QB. But No MLB, Olineman, or Safety is worthy of going 1st overall, and there is a corner who is.

It was an excellent try. I sware you said something about QB.But maybe it was your fierce attack of my rightness as far as QB, MLB, and S goes.

Newman has 2 years left and Jenkins isnt awful. Scandric is scary, I know. But its partly because our Safeties blow and we get no pressure. Especially on ILB blitzes. No corner can cover consistently for 4+ seconds game in and game out. Now this could be all Failips fault; but I know our ILB also suck.

 

[CanuckCowboysFan]

He did again...........

LOL. Guy thinks that the whole process is a surprise and that nobody has a clue where ANYBODY will go till the actually names are called. Woah.

 

[tomson75]

This is the most incorrect post from this whole thread.

How the hell did you do it?

Now it's this one^^^. Although your others are still pretty wrong.

At least you've beaten yourself!

...and you have something to look forward to with your next post. I have faith in you!

 

[locked&loaded]

well there something we can agree on then

We ignored it thinking we where set to draft "wow" players for right now and look where it got us. You have to look more then a few years down the road or you end up where we are now.

If you have a 30+ QB and you get a chance to draft a franchise QB for the future you take it.

Wrong, he has 5 years left more than likely. Even you can agree on that, right? Lets win now. I dont want to wait 5 more years. If we draft a qb now he will be almost 30 again before he plays and we will be looking for a top qb to groom in 3 years again. Is this to hard to understand?