Oh, it’s not Dak and now you want people to be rational with the QB position. Sorry pal, Dalton gets the same testament you gave Dak. We got lucky today.
We are comparing one quarterback who is earning circa $31 million and another who is earning a base salary of what $3 million?
That is the entire point of most people's issue with Dak Prescott. Nobody cares that he's earning a lot of money and good for him that he has around $31 million in the bank for playing 5 games this season, effectively back pay for earning peanuts over the past four years and fully deserved. But it's about the salary cap in the modern era.
Whilst gutting and anyone with any decency will have been upset, the injury for Prescott does provide an opportunity to gauge some sort of value on him going forwards. If Dalton stinks up the joint and we barely win another game then yep Prescott was a whole lot better than I and some others on here thought. I think he will make a full recovery from the injury so there's always the option to sign him up. Conversely, if Dalton plays well and we win the division then wouldn't that suggest that we could be better off drafting a rookie QB going forwards and not paying Prescott $40 million a year if we want to build an overall stronger roster?
If the latter, then imagine the backlash Jerry Jones would face for not paying Prescott after this injury - difficult one for PR.