Any living soul believe Dak is a good QB after that dump?

[BoysForLife]

No it hasn't. It's been proven right time after time.

Honestly, where did you get that incorrect info from? Mahomes is even suffering w/ subpar WRs. Burrows w/ a lesser D after letting Ogunjobi walk. It's all over the league and it's being talked about a bunch. I think you have a bad info source. Or maybe it's just stubbornness.

Spot on

Brady's patriots were exhibit A

He was never paid like the goat even though he clearly was the goat

He could have demanded (and gotten) twice what he was paid for playing football

Their model allowed them to keep the rest of the cupboard stocked well enough to stack up 7 Lombardi's

Another good example for your argument was the Seahawks about a decade ago

Once they paid Russ top dollar they fell back pretty quick


It happens over and over and somehow people keep acting like we're going to be the exception

 

[CATCH17]

Play better? You actually still believe dak can play better? Did you see the pass to Schoonmaker. Not under pressure and ball shoots 10 foot over his head. This lingering idea that dak can actually not be dak is sheer nonsense. The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. Dak is an umitigated disaster.

You have to carry Dak.


They need to change quarterbacks, get a million turnovers, or find a young Adrian Peterson to win with this guy.

 

[kskboys]

Spot on

Brady's patriots were exhibit A

He was never paid like the goat even though he clearly was the goat

He could have demanded (and gotten) twice what he was paid for playing football

Their model allowed them to keep the rest of the cupboard stocked well enough to stack up 7 Lombardi's

Another good example for your argument was the Seahawks about a decade ago

Once they paid Russ top dollar they fell back pretty quick


It happens over and over and somehow people keep acting like we're going to be the exception

Why do people keep insisting player salaries don't matter? I truly don't get it, when it's so obvious they are a huge factor. You think the Chiefs wanted to let Tyreek walk?

 

[DStar22]

when he launched it down the field in a desperate attempt to do.. hell if I know what , with a safety going after it and intercepting after it went way over his receiver;'s head, I once again was forced to realize I was actually correct and that no, Dak is not a great QB , after having built up a modest small anount of hope that he had turned a corner this year.

 

[CT Dal Fan]

It was 28-10 in large part because we started the game w/ 3 consecutive 3 and outs.

How do you miss stuff like this?

I'm not missing it. The first line I said was "Dak was terrible".

But the bottom line is the Cowboys' much hyped defense was beaten down right from the start. They were down 7-0 before Dak even took a snap. And if anyone thinks the Cowboys still would have won EVEN IF Dak played well they are delusional. Maybe it would have been a 42-30 defeat instead of 42-10, but a defeat nonetheless.

 

[KMY_Amber]

I agree but I don't think any other quarterback -realistically- can come in and do any better under McCarthless.

Dak looks bad, and his feeble arm is certainly minimizing the playbook.

Also, the play design has been bad, easy to cover, and easy to predict with a little bit of film prep. So, oftentimes, nobody is open. Certainly we don't want Dak throwing interceptions, but we'd also be mad if Dak ended the game with 10+ sacks ("he's holding the ball too long!").

So, Dak is bad, McCarthy is bad, and the receivers aren't getting open (and sometimes just jog through their routes if they're not the primary).

Oh, and the o-line often cracks too, and they can't stay healthy.

So, it's the recipe for an 8-9, miss the playoffs season.

They better fix this, or it's time to simply clean house.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Dak wasn't the problem. The playcalling and designs were.

 

[G2]

I'm not missing it. The first line I said was "Dak was terrible".

But the bottom line is the Cowboys' much hyped defense was beaten down right from the start. They were down 7-0 before Dak even took a snap. And if anyone thinks the Cowboys still would have won EVEN IF Dak played well they are delusional. Maybe it would have been a 42-30 defeat instead of 42-10, but a defeat nonetheless.

At one point it was 28-3. Dak gets the blame for the 3 and outs. He was lucky on the TD. There was no pressure, open WRs everywhere and this all made the defense play like crap the ENTIRE game. Penalties had no effect and neither did awful field position. The play calls were spot on as well as coaching adjustments.
It's all Dak.

People believe this.

 

[RomoIsGod]

Romo kept growing as a qb

 

[Starstruck22]

Dak wasn't the problem. The playcalling and designs were.

Dak is not the problem? so everyone said Moore was the problem. Change playcallers and dak is still not the problem? I agree MCCarthy is prehistoric but dak cannot hit wide open receivers in big games. Fat mike has nothing to do with that. Dak sucks has always sucked and will continue to suck. In the sf playoff game he was unable to locate the open receiver 2 steps away from covered one.

 

[Starstruck22]

Dak wasn't the problem. The playcalling and designs were.

Cant hit open reciever????? Not the problem. Throwing picks And 4 in last 2 games. Not the problem? When will the blind finally see???

 

[Arkyvarminter]

According to the poll 95% are ready to move on.....

 

[Starstruck22]

The more you pay your QB(or others), the fewer resources you have to put on the field. Of course it's about the money.

Bingo

 

[Starstruck22]

According to the poll 95% are ready to move on.....

Indeed dak needs to go

 

[CT Dal Fan]

At one point it was 28-3. Dak gets the blame for the 3 and outs. He was lucky on the TD. There was no pressure, open WRs everywhere and this all made the defense play like crap the ENTIRE game. Penalties had no effect and neither did awful field position. The play calls were spot on as well as coaching adjustments.
It's all Dak.

People believe this.

No it was actually a 14-7 game for a brief period.

The only point I am making is people are jumping all over the interceptions, but they occurred after the game was out of hand anyway. I agree Dak was bad even before the turnovers. But it seems like the picks are the only thing the national media is obsessing over.

Basically I agree Dak was bad. But the three interceptions aren't why. The game was already over by the time he threw the first.

 

[G2]

No it was actually a 14-7 game for a brief period.

The only point I am making is people are jumping all over the interceptions, but they occurred after the game was out of hand anyway. I agree Dak was bad even before the turnovers. But it seems like the picks are the only thing the national media is obsessing over.

Basically I agree Dak was bad. But the three interceptions aren't why. The game was already over by the time he threw the first.

I agree with you. I think they were in "garbage time" so they don't count.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Cant hit open reciever????? Not the problem. Throwing picks And 4 in last 2 games. Not the problem? When will the blind finally see???

When you learn some football.

 

[HonoluluCowboy]

This.. Dak sucked Sunday night, but lets not act like we lost that game 17 - 0, everyone from the HC/DC on down got fleeced

Yes its everyone else Fault that Dak went 3 and out 4 straight drives . Throwing over receiver's , throwing yards before the stick on 3rd down, leaving the D on the field the entire first half , etc

Well that would be solid if SF kept them on the field but they didnt... the first drive Sf drove the ball before the offense even touched it then there were a total of 7 minutes of SF TOP and we had 6 top before the SF drove again and scored.. so your telling me our defense tired out in 7 minutes because we scored on a 5 minute drive right after.. make it make sense thier guys are good if they need to play 6 minutes of the 30 but our guys are gased if they play 7 minutes of the 30...does that make sense to you?

then half came i guess the coaches made the D run sprints during half or something..the offense SUCKED the defense equally sucked there is no two ways about it.

It doesn't matter if the D was bad or good . What matters is what Dak did when he had the ball . Quit throwing up smoke and mirrors to deflect away from the fact DAK sucks .

 

[TheFutballFan]

DAK was a 4th round pick for a reason, Dallas got as much they could out of him. To think he's got enough talent to go to the Superbowl is delusional. His throws are inconsistent, can't run good enough and most importantly he doesn't see things quick enough. Look how fast Brock Purdy sees it, gets the football out quick. I would give Trey a shot and run to open up the pass.

 

[Captain-Crash]

we'll I think a couple of guys used the dead guys accounts to raise the "for" dak percentage up. They ain't that many living people believe that crap anymore.