ABQCOWBOY
Regular Joe....
- Messages
- 58,929
- Reaction score
- 27,716
jay cee said:Yeah, he'd take Jim Plunkett and Trent Dilfer over all those guys.
See post immediatly above.
Thanks for playing.
jay cee said:Yeah, he'd take Jim Plunkett and Trent Dilfer over all those guys.
burmafrd said:Its always about race. Stupid people. Well, its not like they have intelligent sportswriters or sportscasters. Ignorant, dumb and stupid.
WV Cowboy said:Anybody hear Wilbon say that when people question Vick's ability to pass it is a racial thing ?
He went on to say that if a blonde haired white guy won games but didn't pass well he would be a hero.
Alexander said:Vick needs to become a better passer, less of a runner and win a championship and his critics will shut up.
Alexander said:Chris Simms is a blonde haired white guy who cannot hit the broad side of a barn either. Joey Harrington is not blonde, but he is as white bread as you get and he is awful and the media never hesitates to take a shot.
If Wilbon's ridiculous theory held true, people would be worshipping these two. They aren't. If anything, I think the media fawns over Vick, just like they do McNabb. But it is a "race" thing?
Vick needs to become a better passer, less of a runner and win a championship and his critics will shut up.
joseephuss said:But Simms and Harrington are not winning games. And I don't think Wilbon's comments were that all white QBs are loved no matter their performance.
Delhomme and Plummer are better examples. The past couple of seasons, their teams won games and got to the playoffs, but neither has won a Superbowl. Their passing wasn't that great. They both turned the ball over quite a bit, yet they don't seem to be criticized as much as Vick.
What is the reason that Vick appears to be criticized harsher than these guys? I don't know. I don't think it is race and that is a bad view by Wilbon. Racism still exists, but it isn't what is driving the criticism of Vick. Heck, Vick is also revered by lots of people. He just gets the most coverage of any player in the league. That makes his critics and praisers stick out more.
ABQCOWBOY said:Like em all Jossie. Just don't believe the criteria fits the discussion here. Don Meredith was good, Bart Starr is in the HOF. Danny White was good, Ron Jaworski won a championship and is on TV every nite. Craig Morton was good, Roger Staubach is the guy most of us believe was the best. Dan Marino, statistically, is the most prolific QB ever. Joe Montana is widely considered the best to ever play the game. The jury is still out on Peyton, and I do believe that he is going to win one this year, but until he does win it, I don't want to hear about him either. However, if he fails to win one, he will never be viewed in the same light as Brady.
You play the game to win championships. Everything else is 1st loser. Just the way I see it.
lurkercowboy said:Jaworski won an NFC championship, true.
dbair1967 said:Plummer has been one of the most criticized players in the league the past few seasons, dont know where you are getting that the media is easy on him...DelHomme is kinda a media darling, but nowhere to the level of Vick...Vick is w/o a doubt the most coddled athlete in sports now
David
Get one young one...off your knees...I require nothing but your allegiance...lol.jay cee said:
This is by far the post of the day. Thank you Wayne. Especially for the paragraph that I highlighted.
Alright thats a flat out guess total pure speculation no more no lessthey were 9-19 because he missed basically one whole season there and the defense that one year was absolutely atrocious...had he played all 16 games they'd have still been blown out of those games
Bottomline is he has one of the highest winning percentage of any QB in the NFL right now. They were a playoff team with him in 2002 and won on the road in Green Bay He then gets hurt the next year and what happens they suck and don't make the playoffs. Last year he plays 15 games. Guess what Playoffs. He's played 7 games this year. Guess what 6 wins. So its easy to see he plays 15 games = playoffs. If he's injured they suck and lose.on the other hand the two years they did make the playoffs, they were near the top of the league in sacks and forced turnovers, and Vick had nothing to do with either of those numbers...
JackMagist said:Of the best and most effective of the black QBs Culpepper, McNair and McNabb are all better moving or running than they are in the pocket.
Derinyar said:Vick right now does help his team win, but is a medicore QB. If Vick's ability to move is at all hampered in a game, he is going to be removed, because at this point hes shown no ability to beat a team consistetnly with his arm. In the long run a QB will have to be able to be a consistent threat throwing the ball to be successful. I don't think Vick will get there, because too many people are already telling him hes great which likely makes him doubt the fact that he needs to improve.
McNabb, in my mind, is a more complete QB than Vick is. He realized he had to become better throwing the ball, and has worked on it and has gotten better.
I won't argue the point about Culpepper; I have seen him do some very good work in the pocket but he is also very effective on the move. And again I have not seen that much of Leftwich and honestly when I have seen him he has been injured and hobbling so again...no comment on him. Williams was indeed a good pocket passer (as I mentioned) though it was hard to tell early on when he was with Tampa Bay; there he had to run because he never had time to throw. Moons record speaks for itself he was a great passer; he just slipped my mind. James Harris?...I draw a complete blank on him but on the other side Kordell Stewart was another starter who fit the mold.Alexander said:I disagree. Give Culpepper time to sit back in the pocket, he can kill you with a deep pass. So can Byron Leftwich. Vick, McNabb and McNair fit the "stereotype". But I do not subscribe to the theory that black QBs cannot be pocket passers. Doug Williams was as pocket as they come. So was James Harris. So was Warren Moon.
I also consider McNabb a good QB and he does have a fine deep ball. But I still maintain that in the pocket he throws too many into the ground or too high. He is especially hampered by this with his short to intermediate passes. I do not fear McNabb if we can keep him in the pocket or even carrying the ball downfield but when we let him start to run around in the backfield he kills us with his impromptu playmaking ability.Alexander said:Absolutely.
McNabb has honed his deep ball and is now considered complete (at least by me).
Vick is the opposite. He has next to no touch. Even Brian Finneran has stated that it takes a while to get used to his passes because he throws a very uncatchable football with way too much behind it.
JackMagist said:While unfair to some of the black QBs the "stereotype" exists fore a reason; it does fit a high percentage of black QBs.