America's Team
Florida Cowboy
- Messages
- 599
- Reaction score
- 0
Im gonna go with no
iceberg;1607963 said:it's the IGS at work (instant gratification society). just nod and let it go.
GimmeTheBall!;1608251 said:Not quite what you arrogantly describe as an instant gratification society. If you re-read the post, its premise was that Hurd has entrenched himself as No. 3. Nothing more, nothing less.
I don't see -- though in your mind it might be possible -- the jump from the premise of Nos. 3 and 4 exchanging positions to anybody calling for instant gratification. The preseason and season unfold so slowly that rarely is anything "instant."
But to get to my wider premise: IMHO you have graduated from putting words into people's mouths to putting concepts into people's mouths.
How someone can make that jump in thinking is beyond me, slushy. I thought you had learned your lesson from some weeks ago when you played fast and loose with people's words and thoughts, but it is grating, iffin you know what ah mean.
I don't mind the likes of you complaining or criticizing, but your dismissive attitude is a bit disturbing.
In the future you might want to hesitate from injecting pithy little comments and maybe state your case in full.
Not some dismissive post that people on both sides of the question have answered, mostly with respect and the spirit of dialogue and fraternity and drinking from the shiny cup of friendship.
Again, I take no umbridge (I learnt that thar word the other week, though I still don't know how to spelt it) to mosquito-like hit and runs on posts that were crafted with discussion in mind. Not junior high nana-nana-nader or cute little acrynyms that you make up on the fly.
Please rethink it and see if you can answer with some give-and-take and take time to exchange ideas with your fellow Zoners.
That would be helpful, Slushy, and we so do look forward to your otherwise informative and illuminative ideas and thoughts.
Otherwise just pass it by, friend.![]()
This entire thread has excellent reasoning against your initial premise, and you choose to respond to that post? Further, you haven't really successfully defended your premise that Crayton might be out.GimmeTheBall!;1608251 said:Not quite what you arrogantly describe as an instant gratification society. If you re-read the post, its premise was that Hurd has entrenched himself as No. 3. Nothing more, nothing less.
I don't see -- though in your mind it might be possible -- the jump from the premise of Nos. 3 and 4 exchanging positions to anybody calling for instant gratification. The preseason and season unfold so slowly that rarely is anything "instant."
But to get to my wider premise: IMHO you have graduated from putting words into people's mouths to putting concepts into people's mouths.
How someone can make that jump in thinking is beyond me, slushy. I thought you had learned your lesson from some weeks ago when you played fast and loose with people's words and thoughts, but it is grating, iffin you know what ah mean.
I don't mind the likes of you complaining or criticizing, but your dismissive attitude is a bit disturbing.
In the future you might want to hesitate from injecting pithy little comments and maybe state your case in full.
Not some dismissive post that people on both sides of the question have answered, mostly with respect and the spirit of dialogue and fraternity and drinking from the shiny cup of friendship.
I take no umbridge (I learnt that thar word the other week, though I still don't know how to spelt it) to mosquito-like hit and runs on posts that were crafted with discussion in mind. But don't reduce your responses to junior high nana-nana-nader or cute little acrynyms that you make up on the fly.
Please rethink it and see if you can answer with some give-and-take and take time to exchange ideas with your fellow Zoners.
That would be helpful, Slushy, and we so do look forward to your otherwise informative and illuminative ideas and thoughts.
Otherwise just pass it by, friend.
Con deep respeto and fraternity and civility,
GTB
![]()
Crown Royal;1608261 said:This entire thread has excellent reasoning against your initial premise, and you choose to respond to that post? Further, you haven't really successfully defended your premise that Crayton might be out.
Don't like tha posts ridiculing your ideas, don't read em, blutto.
JamaicaRector85;1607203 said:I am kind of worried about that, and a bit puzzled. He's been more of a positive then any of these new guys yet they apparently have more skill than this guy has. If its there it hasn't shown itself on the field.
But to answer your question, no I will keep my sig and name.:starspin
tunahelper;1607224 said:Crayton is clearly the better of the two.
This is not based on performance because Crayton has outperformed most #3WR's in the NFL the last couple seasons.