Anyone hear Jamie Dukes--ridiculous!

[MWILL]

Can we have Austin and Evans and leave Roy and TO to their own worlds?

I can deal with that.

I did like T.O. when he was here and I was shocked when they let him go. I feel by not giving Romo a similar type of playmaking WR would make this offense as productive as it should.

 

[T-RO]

Jamie Dukes is the most bitter, obsessed guy on the network, riddled with personal issues.

I guarantee he won't last another 18 months. He'll have an anger meltdown.

He was a huge TO lover and he can't admit he was wrong though the evidence has piled high.

 

[T-RO]

I Am Outraged!™

Funniest thing of the day!

 

[diehard2294]

I thought it was funny when R.Eisen said we are going to show highlights of the game and Dukes says,"highlights". and T.Waddle says "wake me when it's over"

 

[MWILL]

I am not mad at all. I am thrilled TO is no longer on the team. You don't appear to be thrilled with that at all. Like I said, take it up with TO as he likes to get thrown off every team he plays for.

Be my guest. Go get you some Bills pom poms and cheer for Evans and TO, that is fine by me.

TO is gone and he ain't coming back. I could not be more happy about it.

I'm not thrilled about the fact that T.O. has not been properly replaced. How many times do I have to say that.

The passing game is failing because they don't have a #1 WR (sorry, but Austin is not a #1) and the OC is not good and for some reason Dallas doesn't feel we need to draft a WR in the 1st or 2nd rounds due to the 3yr rule.

 

[gbrittain]

I'm not thrilled about the fact that T.O. has not been properly replaced. How many times do I have to say that.

The passing game is failing because they don't have a #1 WR (sorry, but Austin is not a #1) and the OC is not good and for some reason Dallas doesn't feel we need to draft a WR in the 1st or 2nd rounds due to the 3yr rule.

I hear you loud and clear. Just like I keep saying there is a reason TO is on his fourth team and that the fourth team he is on is because no one else wanted him.

You can't separate TO the talent from TO the man. If you could, like I said earlier I would have my own TO fan club.

There are many a teams much better than Buffalo that could have used someone with TOs talents, but they chose not to because of the man behind the talent.

He did not get axed, because he is talentless. You can have that discussion with someone else. I will give the man his due he is talented, but his talent is not what keeps getting him fired.

 

[MWILL]

I thought it was funny when R.Eisen said we are going to show highlights of the game and Dukes says,"highlights". and T.Waddle says "wake me when it's over"

They do that with games that end at 6 to 7. It's not good to hear, but don't let it get to you.

 

[diehard2294]

They do that with games that end at 6 to 7. It's not good to hear, but don't let it get to you.

get to me, I was LMAO, I would have said the same

 

[MWILL]

I hear you loud and clear. Just like I keep saying there is a reason TO is on his fourth team and that the fourth team he is on is because no one else wanted him.

You can't separate TO the talent from TO the man. If you could, like I said earlier I would have my own TO fan club.

There are many a teams much better than Buffalo that could have used someone with TOs talents, but they chose not to because of the man behind the talent.

He did not get axed, because he is talentless. You can have that discussion with someone else. I will give the man his due he is talented, but his talent is not what keeps getting him fired.

:laugh2: Yeah, now we have a WR that has a good attitude and not talented.

Tell you what, I'll start a T.O. fan club, and you start a R.W. fan club.

 

[MWILL]

get to me, I was LMAO, I would have said the same

Coo, I was thinking the same thing while I was watching the game.

 

[Dallas]

I don't understand what TO is doing in Buffalo that says we would do so much better w/ him still on the team?


How many yards does he have?

How many TD's does he have?


Is he lighting it up there and I am just missing it?

 

[MWILL]

I don't understand what TO is doing in Buffalo that says we would do so much better w/ him still on the team?


How many yards does he have?

How many TD's does he have?


Is he lighting it up there and I am just missing it?

It's really about who's playing better T.O. or R.W.

If Dallas traded for a better WR than RW, then this wouldn't be an issue.

 

[gbrittain]

:laugh2: Yeah, now we have a WR that has a good attitude and not talented.

Tell you what, I'll start a T.O. fan club, and you start a R.W. fan club.

You go ahead and start a TO fan club...you sound like you already have anyway.

Since you want to play the could have would have should have game. Lets do it right.

Buffalo keeps TO. Detroit keeps RW. Dallas keeps 1st, 3rd and 6th and we draft Percy Harvin.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

You go ahead and start a TO fan club...you sound like you already have anyway.

Since you want to play the could have would have should have game. Lets do it right.

Buffalo keeps TO. Detroit keeps RW. Dallas keeps 1st, 3rd and 6th and we draft Percy Harvin.

I doubt dallas would have took Harvin.

 

[gbrittain]

I doubt dallas would have took Harvin.

I doubt it as well.

 

[MWILL]

You go ahead and start a TO fan club...you sound like you already have anyway.

Since you want to play the could have would have should have game. Lets do it right.

Buffalo keeps TO. Detroit keeps RW. Dallas keeps 1st, 3rd and 6th and we draft Percy Harvin.

You are already starting off wrong.

Dallas won't draft a WR in the first rd. :laugh2:

 

[Givincer]

so where was your MOUTH when owens was putting up 0's during the game?

I honestly don't even get the relevance of this.

But for the record, as far as I can see, Owens didn't have any no reception games when he played for the Cowboys. For whatever that's worth...

The point being made is our offense would be more potent with Owens than without. And your reply happens to be completely beside said point.

amazing the owens crowd only shows up when owens does. isn't that called an "entourage"?

Again, I don't get what this has to do with my point, but okay.

If you read my posts I think you'd find it hard to say I was part of any "Owens crowd." Or any crowd for that matter.

Simply, I thought it was both a dangerously stupid and dangerously bad personnel move.

 

[gbrittain]

You are already starting off wrong.

Dallas won't draft a WR in the first rd. :laugh2:

Finally something we can agree on...you are right about that.

 

[MWILL]

Finally something we can agree on...you are right about that.

It was going to happen at sometime.:wink2:

 

[gbrittain]

It was going to happen at sometime.:wink2:

True...true. Now lets just hope Dallas can win with the help of or inspite of RW going forward.