Jake
Beyond tired of Jerry
- Messages
- 36,067
- Reaction score
- 84,350
I still do not understand why people rely on comparing stats of one quarterback to another on various teams.
They do not have the same offensive line.
They do not have the same running back.
They do not have the same receivers.
They do not have the same defense.
They do not have the same coaching.
I have said this before but it's like comparing Formula One drivers in different cars.
Would Lewis Hamilton have won six World Championships if he was driving a Williams? Obviously not.
Would Sergio Perez have won a World Championship if he was driving a Mercedez over the past six years in place of Lewis Hamilton? Most likely yes and probably more than one.
Would Tom Brady have won six Superbowls at the Cleveland Browns? Obviously not.
Would Aaron Rodgers have won more than one Superbowl if at the New England Patriots? Obviously yes.
So I ask myself this question - what record would I expect a franchise quarterback in his fourth year to have on this Dallas Cowboys roster?
Even with this coaching, given that the QB is a fourth year starter, and, not a rookie so should have the ability to read extensive defensive coverages and audible at the line of scrimmage, then I would be expecting us to be 7-2.
There have been issues with the defense and the coaching etc but I would still expect a franchise quarterback to have won two games vs the Saints, Packers, Vikings and especially the Jets.
So that's why for me the jury is still out on whether Prescott is a franchise quarterback.
If you consider me to be a moron then that is your prerogative.
So rather than make comparisons using analytical data applied equally to all participants we should dismiss all of that and go by feelz? Stats aren't the end all be all, I agree, but applying an arbitrary standard (such as "the talent on this roster") then picking a record out of the sky to draw a conclusion is a baseless argument. There's nothing to validate it, and simply comes off as drawing a conclusion first then backing into reasons to attempt to justify it.
I don't know you well enough to call you a "moron" or anything like it, but I can say that's a short-sighted rationalization.