1942willys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,305
- Reaction score
- 1,965
DO the math. Its not that hard to figure outDoes increased energy efficiency create capacity? Seems like every new version of every electrical appliance uses lot less energy.
DO the math. Its not that hard to figure outDoes increased energy efficiency create capacity? Seems like every new version of every electrical appliance uses lot less energy.
What kind of technological jump do you expect? When my low fuel light comes on, I have more range than a Chevy Bolt fully charged. The only thing I don't like about these vehicles is that they are being pushed on people. Let the technology get there. Let it be the clear choice without having to pay people to make that choice.No, some folks are just prisoners of the moment and pick at the short comings of the technology as if it’s reached its pinnacle.
It hasn’t.
Battery technology is improving exponentially as most technology where investment in time and money is spent (see Moore’s law).
If you’re thinking the present day battery tech will be the same tomorrow (5-10 years) as it is today, I wouldn’t make that bet.
California has already urged people to avoid plugging in during peak hours.Most people do not understand how stressed the grid is every summer in most of the country. California has brownouts regularly NOW and if there are more EVs it is going to be rolling blackouts all the time
you are the same one that tried to claim 14% of the vehicles in the US sold were electric like that is some kind of huge numberYou aren’t friends with the facts are you. Keep your head in the sand where it belongs.
That's the thing - neither electric or ICE cars are the perfect answer for all situations. For someone like you that drives limited miles a day, electric makes perfect sense. And driving them in large cities helps clear the air, which helps other people at well.I have a bmw i3. It only has 110 miles of range, but I drive 25 miles round trip to work. It’s nice charging on a standard plug and never going to the gas station.
I would never force an EV on someone, but for me, I love it.
In my opinion they are not. They are a novelty. If they were to compete on a level playing field, they would fail.
Does anyone like them? I'll admit, I think they are interesting. But I wouldn't buy one to be my regular car. I might buy one as a toy if I find money to burn.
Much easier to use the train throughout Europe too?I live in Europe and we're already at close to 20% of vehicle sales. I dont know about the US, but in Europe the infrastructure is here. There are also very generous tax and other incentives. For example, public sector workers can charge for free at work.
EV’s are 14% of new car sales in the US and predicted to exponentially explode in sales this year and beyond. You guys got your heads up your okole with your bias.No. For some vehicles, like semi-trucks, it’s just stupid. But bottom line is it doesn’t solve anything, just reroutes the power needs from the gas station to the power plants. Still causes emissions using whatever resources were needed for that power plant to power up your vehicle or manufacturing plant to produce your new electric car. And good luck figuring out how to rebuild the power grid. Right now electric cars are only 3% of new car purchases. Either reduce the need for energy, or continue to experiment with other sources such as hydrogen or nuclear fusion. Because solar or wind won’t provide enough power, fossil fuels are not sustainable long-term, and nuclear fission can be messy. USA consumes power like a mother and we are trying to bring the entire world behind us. Need another solution if this is the end game.
Auto makers are scaling back their EV efforts because people are not buying them. Most people don't want them because they cannot afford them. I'm sure there are many other reasons as well. If you want one, good for you, but most people don't.EV’s are 14% of new car sales in the US and predicted to exponentially explode in sales this year and beyond. You guys got your heads up your okole with your bias.A
I agree in general. But I do wonder if the fundamental design of energy storage will have to change to get us to where we need to be. Will we find a way to pack more energy into smaller spaces using technology that does not yet exist? Can we create some kind of "reactors" that produce electrical energy on demand? Probably not in the next 50 years, but is this the way of the future rather than the trying to squeeze the every last bit of efficiency out of current technology?No, some folks are just prisoners of the moment and pick at the short comings of the technology as if it’s reached its pinnacle.
It hasn’t.
Battery technology is improving exponentially as most technology where investment in time and money is spent (see Moore’s law).
If you’re thinking the present day battery tech will be the same tomorrow (5-10 years) as it is today, I wouldn’t make that bet.
I think both of us are wrong?EV’s are 14% of new car sales in the US and predicted to exponentially explode in sales this year and beyond. You guys got your heads up your okole with your bias.
I'm sure someone here in CZ can figure out how to obtain and employ antimatter.I think both of us are wrong?
https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/q4-2023-ev-sales/#:~:text=In 2023, the EV share,317,168 and 8.1%, respectively.
Total market share 7.6% of all vehicles. 8.1% of vehicles sold in Q4 2023.
Also.. I can’t find out if they include hybrids in these numbers. Either way, that’s a heck of a lot more power grid needed to achieve 100% EVs. And my original point is where is the emission controls if 60% of power grid is generated by fossil fuels anyways, 20% nuclear fission, and only 20% on renewable such as solar, wind, hydro and geothermal. And If we think we’re going to remain a consumer culture and buy new cars every few years, who is accounting for all the emissions and leftover junk caused by the heavy manufacturing of all these EVs. It’s a culture change even if someone can come up with the magical cure which IMO is nuclear fusion, but you still suffer from the overpopulation and car consumer culture.
Other good numbers at that site. Still more of a luxury than an average joe purchase.
I don’t have one although I do have a Tesla Solar system. I pay $25 service charge a month for electricity. EVsales are forecast to skyrocket in the coming years.Auto makers are scaling back their EV efforts because people are not buying them. Most people don't want them because they cannot afford them. I'm sure there are many other reasons as well. If you want one, good for you, but most people don't.
Depends on your source I guess.I think both of us are wrong?
https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/q4-2023-ev-sales/#:~:text=In 2023, the EV share,317,168 and 8.1%, respectively.
Total market share 7.6% of all vehicles. 8.1% of vehicles sold in Q4 2023.
Also.. I can’t find out if they include hybrids in these numbers. Either way, that’s a heck of a lot more power grid needed to achieve 100% EVs. And my original point is where is the emission controls if 60% of power grid is generated by fossil fuels anyways, 20% nuclear fission, and only 20% on renewable such as solar, wind, hydro and geothermal. And If we think we’re going to remain a consumer culture and buy new cars every few years, who is accounting for all the emissions and leftover junk caused by the heavy manufacturing of all these EVs. It’s a culture change even if someone can come up with the magical cure which IMO is nuclear fusion, but you still suffer from the overpopulation and car consumer culture.
Other good numbers at that site. Still more of a luxury than an average joe purchase.