Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
firehawk350;1446318 said:Wow, what an advantage!
it's still an advantage
firehawk350;1446318 said:Wow, what an advantage!
Hostile;1446316 said:I can relate, some responses are useless to read for the same reason.
He was a glorified H-Back both seasons. Just because he lined up more as a tight end during one particular season doesn't change the fact.firehawk350;1446266 said:When he has two better seasons in a row. Oh yeah, those seasons are the only ones that he was the starting h-back or TE (as he was in 06)
FuzzyLumpkins;1446340 said:Guys you let the Commander bait you into a Wash versus us debate. You can compare position to position all day long but last time i checked they were the 6th worst team in the league last season and we were in the playoffs. Washington has done very little to improve their club and the draft outside of that first pick will be no help at all.
A good season for them next season would be to improve to 9 wins. A good season for us would be to improve to 12 wins. Quite frankly after last years performance they are not in our league whatsoever. The teams that we have to concern ourselves with are going to be:
1) Chicago
2) Seattle
3) Philadelphia
4) Carolina
5) New Orleans
6) Atlanta
When you look at it like this then you have to really think weve got a good shot. Chicago losing Briggs and Rivera hurts. Seattle's window ofoppurtunity is closing. Philly needs a great draft or they regress. Delhomme is getting worse every year. Counting on Michael Vick is like trusting your daughter with a binch of ex cons.
You really have to think were right in the thick of it.
I think it's "or something," but I was never good at multiple choice.Bob Sacamano;1446328 said:is that supposed to be an insult or something?
Hostile;1445627 said:In April there are 32 contenders.
stasheroo;1446212 said:It's like talking to a wall!
:bang2:
Like Forrest says, "stupid is as stupid does....."
Hostile;1445627 said:In April there are 32 contenders.
I'd explain it to you HH, but then you'd try all kinds of spin control and I'd just end up poking fun. In April there's still a draft to come where huge impacts on a team can be made. There are still June cuts. In April there is no way to project how good a team might become. Last year there is no way anyone thought New Orleans (who had a far worse record than Houston this year) would be a contender. But they were.HeavyHitta31;1446669 said:I will never understand this mentality
No, there are NOT 32 contenders in April. The Houston Texans are not a contender. The Cleveland Browns are not a contender. The Oakland Raiders are not a contender. The Detroit Lions are not a contender.
There are more obviously, but you get the idea. I would argue that there are not that many teams with a legit shot to win the title.
Indy
New England
Chicago
San Diego
Baltimore
New Orleans
Philly
Dallas
Cincy
Seattle
After that, there is a massive drop off in terms on likelyhood.
At least it's better than baseball. After NY and Boston is there anyone else?HeavyHitta31;1446669 said:No, there are NOT 32 contenders in April.
Hostile;1446701 said:In April there's still a draft to come where huge impacts on a team can be made.
There are still June cuts.
In April there is no way to project how good a team might become.
Last year there is no way anyone thought New Orleans (who had a far worse record than Houston this year) would be a contender. But they were.
If you can't see that, then I suggest an eye exam. I'm not saying every team is a top contender, I am saying in April any team could build enough to make the playoffs.
Deny this if you wish, but it only makes you look silly.
big dog cowboy;1446705 said:At least it's better than baseball. After NY and Boston is there anyone else?
I disagree. Year-in, year-out, MLB is ruled by a handful of teams with the best skilled players and very good managers.HeavyHitta31;1446725 said:Hos' arguement actually applies to baseball, since the game is such a crapshoot. Baseball involves more lucky bounces and crazy plays than any sport on the planet, just about any team can win the title because team skill doesnt mean neaerly as much as it does in basketball, hockey or football.
The only thing NO had done at this time last season was sign Drew Brees and Sean Payton. Nobody had them as "top contenders" at this time.HeavyHitta31;1446721 said:No, but many had them as a "shocker" team to rise up in a division with Tampa and Atlanta not expected to amount to much. No one is expecting anything from the likes of Cleveland, Oakland, Detroit, etc.
Not to mention they DID get pounded in the game that actually mattered
HeavyHitta31;1446725 said:Hos' arguement actually applies to baseball, since the game is such a crapshoot. Baseball involves more lucky bounces and crazy plays than any sport on the planet, just about any team can win the title because team skill doesnt mean neaerly as much as it does in basketball, hockey or football.
DallasEast;1446741 said:I disagree. Year-in, year-out, MLB is ruled by a handful of teams with the best skilled players and very good managers.
Tell you what, name your 5 teams and at the end of next season if all 5 missed the playoffs I will congratulate you in front of this entire forum. I'm not interested in a bet. I can make the same projection, but it isn't impressive. I still say they are contenders until other teams don't flub everything up and stay ahead of them.HeavyHitta31;1446721 said:No, they can't. Again, name your price. I can name 5 teams right here that I KNOW, FOR A FACT, won't make the playoffs this year. That alone disqualifies your argument