Are The Cowboys Super Bowl Contenders?

superpunk;1446294 said:
Here's some

Witten's second and third years

1737 yards, 12 TDs

Cooley

1508 yards, 13 TDs

:eek:Picking and choosing is teh hotness.

Wait, so Witten gets four years to have a good season and Cooley only gets three? How jacked is that?
 
firehawk350;1446296 said:
Wait, so Witten gets four years to have a good season and Cooley only gets three? How jacked is that?

It's confirmed.

You can't read.
 
superpunk;1446294 said:
Here's some

Witten's second and third years

1737 yards, 12 TDs

Cooley

1508 yards, 13 TDs

:eek:Picking and choosing is teh hotness.

What, no response to the first downs and receptions I put in?
 
firehawk350;1446291 said:
That's a statisical impossibility. If you have the same amount of yards and less receptions, you have to have more YPC. And Cooley has the edge on 1st downs.

firehawk350;1446289 said:
We'll go there.

Witten: 110 receptions, 77 first downs
Cooley: 128 receptions, 77 first downs...

how does COoley have the edge on 1st downs?

and you're right, by the last 2 years, Cooley averages 11.9 yards a catch, Witten...11.7, I was looking at WItten's career ypc
 
superpunk;1446297 said:
It's confirmed.

You can't read.

Yeah, that makes sense. Witten's been in longer, therefore it's unrealistic to compare HIS best season to Cooley's as Cooley hasn't had the same opportunity.
 
Bob Sacamano;1446299 said:
how does COoley have the edge on 1st downs?

and you're right, by the last 2 years, Cooley averages 11.9 yards a catch, Witten...11.7, I was looking at WItten's career ypc

Your right, I mistyped. I meant receptions. My fault.
 
Hostile;1446290 said:
I'm no fan of either guy, but I can't deny their talent. That's my whole point.

Thanks for paying attention.

I didn't see the criteria for talent in your post pal, which is useless to grade if you suck
 
firehawk350;1446302 said:
Yeah, that makes sense. Witten's been in longer, therefore it's unrealistic to compare HIS best season to Cooley's as Cooley hasn't had the same opportunity.

So, since Witten and Cooley's 'years in the league' will never be the same, I guess we can't compare anything, right?

I mean which way do you want to twist things so they somehow support your inept point?
 
firehawk350;1446302 said:
Yeah, that makes sense. Witten's been in longer, therefore it's unrealistic to compare HIS best season to Cooley's as Cooley hasn't had the same opportunity.

Witten's best year came his 2nd year
 
1st 3 years for cooley
04 37 rec. 314 yds. 6tds
05 71 rec. 774 yds. 7tds
06 57 rec. 734 yds. 6tds
41 games started.

1st 3 years for witten
03 35 rec. 347 yds 1td
04 87 rec. 980 yds 6tds
05 66 rec. 757 yds 6tds
38 games started
 
Bob Sacamano;1446305 said:
I didn't see the criteria for talent in your post pal, which is useless to grade if you suck

Alright, I think we've beat this subject to death, and it's clear no one is going to concede, so let's just call it agreeing to disagree?
 
bigbadroy;1446308 said:
1st 3 years for cooley
04 37 rec. 314 yds. 6tds
05 71 rec. 774 yds. 7tds
06 57 rec. 734 yds. 6tds
41 games started.

1st 3 years for witten
03 35 rec. 347 yds 1td
04 87 rec. 980 yds 6tds
05 66 rec. 757 yds 6tds
38 games started

Oh, so we're going to say, forget about the fact that Witten has one more season, let's throw that out so we can include that all important 2nd season? Again, I'm done with this, I realize that by leaving the argument now, you'll think I conceded defeat, but I'm just trying to get on with the rest of my day.
 
Bob Sacamano;1446305 said:
I didn't see the criteria for talent in your post pal, which is useless to grade if you suck
I can relate, some responses are useless to read for the same reason.
 
firehawk350;1446315 said:
Oh, so we're going to say, forget about the fact that Witten has one more season, let's throw that out so we can include that all important 2nd season? Again, I'm done with this, I realize that by leaving the argument now, you'll think I conceded defeat, but I'm just trying to get on with the rest of my day.


Way to take 'the high road' and leave......

:lmao2:
 
stasheroo;1446319 said:
Way to take 'the high road' and leave......

:lmao2:

No, I'm not saying I won the argument or saying I'm better then this, I just have other stuff to do, how is that taking the high road?
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,112
Messages
13,789,503
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top