DFWJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 60,080
- Reaction score
- 48,825
Draft Brandon Thomas with 1st rd 7 pick and put him on IR to start at RT next year
Problem solved
Sadly, he'll be long gone by then. great idea though.
Draft Brandon Thomas with 1st rd 7 pick and put him on IR to start at RT next year
Problem solved
Sadly, he'll be long gone by then. great idea though.
Draft Brandon Thomas with 1st rd 7 pick and put him on IR to start at RT next year
Problem solved
His arms could be a bit of a problem with quick fast guys on the edge. His feet are about like Free's. His hands and punch appears to be a good bit better than Free. He can backup C, play G and go to RT if needed. G is his position.
Measurement geeks won't like him because of the arms. But fact is, Joe Thomas has 32 1/2. Jake Long 32 7/8.
Arm length is just like WR height. Yes, you want optimal measurements. But if the WR can get open, who cares? With a lineman it is the same. The strength of their initial punch and their footwork, if top shelf, can minimize the loss of advantage with their reach. It is just idiotic how much stock is put into it when you have an upper echelon player who does all the other things right. If you are talking a less talented player, then you want the measurements to be closer to the preferred standard.
I like Thomas but I expect he is going higher. Recall people said Beasley would be there for us in the 3rd.
If Thomas is still there when the 5th starts we would do well to move up a few to get him
This pretty much ends the need for this thread. Very well said. The only question now is where does he play to give this team the most value.Measurement geeks won't like him because of the arms. But fact is, Joe Thomas has 32 1/2. Jake Long 32 7/8.
Arm length is just like WR height. Yes, you want optimal measurements. But if the WR can get open, who cares? With a lineman it is the same. The strength of their initial punch and their footwork, if top shelf, can minimize the loss of advantage with their reach. It is just idiotic how much stock is put into it when you have an upper echelon player who does all the other things right. If you are talking a less talented player, then you want the measurements to be closer to the preferred standard.
BTW @jobberone, I have to say as much as I wish Parnell and Weems would push Doug, I really do not like Free at guard. I think he would get bullrushed into Romo's lap far too often. His best assett at Tackle is his technique at setting an edge.
Last year was Parnell's year and he blew it. I would not be surprised at all to see him not even make the final cuts.
No leary?
Just curious if there are any good/great RTs out there with comparable height/weight/arm length numbers to Martin. I really want this kid to replace Free.
Doug Free, to me, is a player who lives purely on technique. His only true physical gift is that he happens to be really tall and fat. He doesn't have a great anchor and isn't out physicallying anyone. To me, Martin is very much like doug free, but he gives up some height and gets some physical ability in return. He will alway sstruggle with the fast edge rusher, which makes him better suited to RT, but he immediately makes it possible for you to run to either side just as effectively should you play him there.
ALl that said, Garrett does want to play him at tackle for the time being and, if they get another guard next year, I would assume that they will bounce him to RT and let Doug walk.
I think Free is strong but lets guys get under him at times. When a tackle allows that they often look stupid. It's his hand technique and punch. He doesn't have a great hip throw for that punch and he just doesn't use his hands well. He's great on the edge. He doesn't have the glutes and core for a great run game either. He does set the edge well and he's capable of making a play in space but not consistently. He's a slightly better than avg RT.
There's one Safety left: Joyner, a few intriguing CB but we are deep there.
There's a few QB prospects, a few LB types at various values, a ton of WR still and a smattering of DL.
Free will be a 31 year old free agent next year. They can probably get him to a team-friendly deal.
Free gets a bad rap because of the down year after he signed his contract. 2011 he was great, 2012 he blew it but last year he played really well again. For the right price Free should stay on the roster.
free is not a free agent next year. he is signed for 15 and 16 at 8 mil a year
Agreed. XWalker laid on in great detail all the help Free received last season from Waters/Bern to allow Free to simply worry about the outside move. They had to adjust the entire "natural: dynamic of the OL (inside out) to accomodate Free's inadequacies. Even if Martin is the starting G, the team needs to turn over any rock looking to replace this inadequate starter. Heck, the draft and UDFA hasn't concluded, we could still land our starting RT this season to take over in 2015.Free has never been great. He's never even been really good. What he's been is overrated by a fan base who doesn't understand what they're watching. A front office too. When he has help, he's "good". When he doesn't, he's exposed as the mediocre player he's always been.