speedkilz88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 36,951
- Reaction score
- 23,099
76, 98, 92, and 90 do not look small.
Your point, while correct in general, was not the case in this game.
They ran the ball 31 times in the game.
For the season, they averaged 31 carries per game.
In the Super Bowl, they ran for 103 yards.
They averaged 115 yards per game during the season.
For the season, the Steelers averaged 244 net yards per game passing, and 1.3 interceptions per game.
In the Super Bowl, they threw for 207 net yards, and threw three interceptions, one of which came on the last play of the game.
If anything, Pittsburgh played to their statistical model for the 1995 season. There was no inability to rely on the running game - it performed the way it had all season. The passing game also performed the way it had on the average for the season, if anything, it performed below average in terms of output.
The Cowboys didn't perform to their season level offensively. Not even close, in fact. But, when they needed to gain yards on the ground, they did.
And when Pittsburgh needed to, they couldn't.
That was the game when I saw the Great Wall beginning to crumble. A lot of that was Nate just running out of gas late in the season. But also losing our Center and that mess then Tui was also beginning to drop. All the pounding they did that year caught up to them in the SB. Pitt had a very strong D line and stymied our run game m,ost of the time. BUT when it really mattered they reached down and like all true Champs did it when it really was important. But I was thinking after that game that we really needed to rebuild the O line. We had LA and Erik but we were going to have to soon replace the rest. Interestingly we did replace Tui with the Hotel and we had LA but with Erik getting injured and then fading we never really replaced anyone else. That was of course on Jerruh and his idiotic no first rd picks on the O line and try and draft low and develop fixation.
Are they using Gregory at 230? most 4-3 D ends are around 270. Hardy is bigger than that, Mincey is bigger than that and Lawrence looks thick. He is probably around 270. Crawford is a beast, I am not worried about his weight. In short, no, I dont think our d line is too small. We will have a great rotation to keep everyone fresh.
1. Stats don't lie. People just are bad at using critical thinking skills to interpret them
2. The graph clearly notes 4-3 Ds.
3. Another issue with statistics is that people fail to take the time to try to understand what is being presented.
That was the game when I saw the Great Wall beginning to crumble. A lot of that was Nate just running out of gas late in the season. But also losing our Center and that mess then Tui was also beginning to drop. All the pounding they did that year caught up to them in the SB. Pitt had a very strong D line and stymied our run game m,ost of the time. BUT when it really mattered they reached down and like all true Champs did it when it really was important. But I was thinking after that game that we really needed to rebuild the O line. We had LA and Erik but we were going to have to soon replace the rest. Interestingly we did replace Tui with the Hotel and we had LA but with Erik getting injured and then fading we never really replaced anyone else. That was of course on Jerruh and his idiotic no first rd picks on the O line and try and draft low and develop fixation.
They did hit on OG Ron Stone but didn't match the gnats contract in 1996 and lost him after 3 years of development.The biggest issue was once they lost Mark Stepnoski, who was 28 years old, and replaced him with 35 year old Ray Donaldson, they were really rolling the dice on Donaldson remaining healthy and effective. He ended up breaking his leg in the Thanksgiving day game against the Chiefs, and they had nothing behind him. They had to sign Derek Kennard again, after he had been sitting on the couch for the first half of the season. Kennard was dominated by Joel Steed in the game, and that shut down the running game.
You're right on them not recognizing the decline taking place, and they couldn't identify good replacements. After the 1993 Super Bowl win, the Cowboys lost/let go Kevin Gogan, John Gesek, and Frank Cornish, and replaced them with Larry Allen and Derek Kennard. Big win on Allen, big loss with Kennard. They drafted Allen, George Hegamin, Shane Hannah, and then in 1996, Clay Shiver and Kenneth McDaniel. They missed on all of them except for Allen. They needed to hit on some of these guys, but just couldn't identify good linemen. Donaldson came back again in 1996, and started the whole season, but he was completely shot. Newton's decline really began to take hold in 1996, and Tuinei was less than he was as well. Erik Williams went from being a nasty dominator to a dirty player who held his own. Sad to watch. Williams for a three year span was as intimidating and as dominant a lineman as we have seen.
Are you concerned about the size of our DL?
They did hit on OG Ron Stone but didn't match the gnats contract in 1996 and lost him after 3 years of development.