Doomsday101;4441093 said:I don't know about looking at the negitive. I'm sure out of all the young OL players we brought in not all will pan out and you also have to have some depth along the OL. My hope is we do bring in a FA or draft an interior lineman to add to the mix.
Deep_Freeze;4441100 said:I wasn't talking about you being negative, the quote that you responded to in your post.
I would be shocked if we didn't draft an OL in the draft, and I don't figure Arkin will have anything to do with us still trying to add talent to the interior of our OL.
Doomsday101;4441101 said:I get what your saying I agree. I think the Draft is a good option
supercowboy8;4441140 said:I have been saying all year that Nagy and or Arkin are centers. Don't have the true power to play OG. Both played Center before in college and I think its the natural position for them both. Nagy I can't see playing OG, plays way to high and is to weak.
tayloner182;4441029 said:There is a part of me that truly believes they are are preparing to run with some combination of Nagy, Arkin, Costa and Kowalski at the 3 interior line positions, without signing a big name in free agency or drafting OL high. If brought back, guys like Kosier and Holland would then be depth or a fallback if 3 of those 4 can't cut it starting.
A little bit of a scary thought, sure, but if it worked out we would have a very young line with continuity for years to come. Let's see what Callahan can do.
maybe I'm wrong but I though he played all 5 positions at some point rather he started there or not.xwalker;4441153 said:I don't think Arkin played Center in college:
2010 - All games at LT
2009 - 9 games at RG and 2 games at LT
2008 - All games at RG
2007 - All games at RG
CoCo;4441202 said:You may recall the talk last training camp was that Arkin's eventual best position would probably be center.
Just when he becomes ready for prime time, if ever, remains to be seen. I doubt Dallas will leave all its O-line eggs in the same basket as 2011. But I'm not as adamant about major talent upgrades to that corp as some are. There are many other significant needs too.
I suspect we'll make the market in 1 or 2 spots and then let the market come to us in others including the draft.
What happens if so and so isn't ready... what happens if so and so gets hurt... what happens if... There is no insurance plan to cover all our vulnerabilities.
Chocolate Lab;4441064 said:Arkin better turn out as something as much hype as he got...
Trent Dilfer did after the draft.AbeBeta;4441274 said:I really think the folks on this board are the only hype machines -- no one with much sense hypes a 4th rounder
sago1;4441052 said:So the Cowboys may be going with 3-4 young OL players from last year who weren't capable starting players. Using them is based on hoping/wishing. We can all hope they work out, but what happens if the season starts and these guys don't look much different from last year.
I thought we had cap space to add some good players. Yet it now sounds like there possibility Jerry isn't going to do anything to improve the OL but hopes last years' guys can step it up this year as interior OL starters. Is Jerry/Garrett really risking our offensive performance & Romo's health again? What happens if they and Callahan are wrong?
41gy#;4441470 said:Phillip Blake (Baylor) looks like a better football player to me. Plus, he played at Baylor. Mayock has Blake listed as his second best center prospect, and he states that Blake is a starter. Blake has prototype size for the position, and he has power and athleticism. Blake is cut out of the Andre Gurode mold, and he is built to play the position.
I'm not buying David Arkin starting at center next year. If Arkin can provide depth at guard or center, that is great. Blake is a better player right now, and he actually has experience at the position. Plus, Blake played in the Big 12.
I'd draft Phillip Blake and not think twice about it. Blake has value at guard, too.
Blake > > > > > > > Arkin, Nagy, and Costa.
Drafting Philip Blake is the cheaper, smarter answer to the position, imo.
