Article: NFL.com Dallas wont make the playoffs

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,434
Reaction score
11,978
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000483160/article/five-teams-that-wont-return-to-the-playoffs

Five teams that won't return to the playoffs
_Sessler-65x90.jpg


Around The NFL scribe Conor Orr went out on a limb this week to predict five new teams that will earn playoff berths in 2015. Orr's crystal ball has the Saints, Bills, Eagles, Texans and Falcons all mining their way into January play, but who will they replace?

According to NFL Media research, at least four new teams have made the playoffs every year since the NFL adopted the 12-team format back in 1990. Over the past 10 campaigns, that average has climbed to more than five teams per season.

We expect nothing different in 2015, especially with so many big names changing zip codes in free agency. The draft will alter the picture, too, but most teams have a basic idea of what their rosters will look like heading into training camp.

It's barely April, but let's do this thing:

1. Cincinnati Bengals: Four years running, NFL fans have been forced to endure an annual January stink bomb from the Bengals. There's talent on this roster, but Cincinnati remains anchored to Andy Dalton as a middle-of-the-pack quarterback whose ceiling was discovered autumns ago. With Pittsburgh growing more powerful on offense and Baltimore still a threat inside the dog-eat-dog AFC North, theBengals will pay for standing pat at the most important position in sports.

2. Dallas Cowboys: Everything clicked for Dallas last season, pounding away at opponents withDeMarco Murray behind the league's grittiest offensive line. Murray is gone -- to Philly, of all places -- leaving the Cowboys to talk up a declining Darren McFadden as a secret weapon. We still see the 'Boys as a dark horse to trade for Adrian Peterson, but reality suggests the team will be forced to lean on a rookie runner. Dallas -- no fluke last season -- will compete into December, but Chip Kelly's revamped Eagles will own the last laugh.

3. Carolina Panthers: Coming off a 7-8-1 campaign, the Panthers have more work to do than any of last year's NFC playoff teams. Bouncing them has more to do with the Saints, though, who certainly don't feel like a team ready to give up on their Super Bowl dreams. Unlike Orr, I don't see two teams coming out of the South, and New Orleans offers the better quarterback and a dangerous combination of runners in Mark Ingram and C.J. Spiller. The Falcons are also bound to be better, making Carolina an outlier for the playoffs.

4. Detroit Lions: Green Bay remains the best team in the division and possibly the entire conference. Meanwhile, Detroit lost their top difference-maker on defense inNdamukong Suh along with Nick Fairley. We're not calling for the Lionsto tumble off a cliff -- not with Matthew Stafford throwing to Calvin Johnsonand Golden Tate -- but in the past four seasons with Stafford under center, Detroit has won 10, four, seven and 11 games. They'll pivot back to earth in 2015, leaving the door open for another conference heavy to nab a wild-card spot.

5. Denver Broncos: Denver's fortunes hinge entirely on what version of Peyton Manning we get come September. There's also the question of how he fits into Gary Kubiak's boot-heavy scheme minus pass-catching tight end Julius Thomas. While we don't expect the Broncos to force Manning into an attack that doesn't make the most of his gifts, changing up the regime midway through Peyton's Super Bowl-or-bust run in Denver was risky. It's a hunch, but the Broncos feel snakebit.

FIVE NEW TEAMS GOING TO PLAYOFFS


Mod edit: Content of article added
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,995
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
There is the possibility.

However I don't get the Chip Kelly's revamp Eagles team line....they might have improved their defense but they gutted their offense...I don't know if Revamped is the word I would use.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,559
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
There is the possibility.

However I don't get the Chip Kelly's revamp Eagles team line....they might have improved their defense but they gutted their offense...I don't know if Revamped is the word I would use.

I can't really see where it can be assumed that they improved their defense either.

I find it more than a bit ironic that Seattle quickly signed the cornerback the Eagles cut (Williams) to replace the one the Eagles signed away (Maxwell).

And, while the Eagles are now overstocked on quality inside linebackers, I don't see where they've effectively replaced Trent Cole.

I just don't get the assumptions being made that Chip Kelly simply 'knows what he's doing'. He looks more like Steve Spurrier than Jimmy Johnson to me at this point.
 

PJTHEDOORS

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,190
Reaction score
18,582
So because Murray left...."leaving the Cowboys to talk up a declining Darren McFadden as a secret weapon. We still see the 'Boys as a dark horse to trade for Adrian Peterson, but reality suggests the team will be forced to lean on a rookie runner."

McFadden was brought as a secret weapon? And we will be FORCED to lean on a rookie runner? Nothing about our OL that will have a big advantage opening holes. Lame article.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,995
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I can't really see where it can be assumed that they improved their defense either.

I find it more than a bit ironic that Seattle quickly signed the cornerback the Eagles cut (Williams) to replace the one the Eagles signed away (Maxwell).

And, while the Eagles are now overstocked on quality inside linebackers, I don't see where they've effectively replaced Trent Cole.

I just don't get the assumptions being made that Chip Kelly simply 'knows what he's doing'. He looks more like Steve Spurrier than Jimmy Johnson to me at this point.

Yeah...that's why I said...Might.

I just feel they added more to the defense than they did to the offense where they got rid WR, QB and RB from last year.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I think this is a big year coming up for this franchise and Jason Garrett. Cowboys were not expected to do much this past season and surprised a lot of people. heading into this year Dallas has lost some quality players including the NFL offensive player of the year. I think this will be the year that Jason will be looked at as one of the better HC in the NFL if he can get this team back to the playoffs competing for a championship.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,645
Reaction score
31,939
Article flawed in so many ways, how do I count thee. Many assumptions being asserted as fact. The Cowboys are the real deal and the writer is apparently a denier of this fact and would have us believe the drivel in this article. The give away is when the Chipster in philly is given way too much credit for turning the iggles in the right direction before they've played a single game.
 

chagus

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,897
Reaction score
2,753
LOL! Looks like someone's trying to raise vegas odds.
 

TX_Yid

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,439
Reaction score
1,579
I thought 5-11 last year. People get predictions wrong.
 

Avery

The Dog that Saved Charleston
Messages
19,465
Reaction score
20,518
If the author knew a single thing about our team, they'd realize that our success hinges on our defense and not our running game.

But hey, journalism...
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
I think this is a big year coming up for this franchise and Jason Garrett. Cowboys were not expected to do much this past season and surprised a lot of people. heading into this year Dallas has lost some quality players including the NFL offensive player of the year. I think this will be the year that Jason will be looked at as one of the better HC in the NFL if he can get this team back to the playoffs competing for a championship.

You are right!

We overachieved last year.

Anything less than Super Bowl 50 championship will be considered a failure!!


I couldn't agree more!
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
You are right!

We overachieved last year.

Anything less than Super Bowl 50 championship will be considered a failure!!


I couldn't agree more!

Ultimately of course I want a SB but I think the teams who put themselves in a position to compete for the title year in and year out like the Pats is where I want to see this team get to.
 

SDCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,763
Reaction score
22,732
There of course is the real chance we don't make the playoffs this coming season. I just don't get the Eagles love.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Ultimately of course I want a SB but I think the teams who put themselves in a position to compete for the title year in and year out like the Pats is where I want to see this team get to.

Nope.

Give me a title first.
Your idea can follow AFTER.

Besides... What the pats do is.... Amazing .... Questionable.... An anomaly by nfl parity standards.

It's unreasonable to strive for that.

Get the bling. First!
 

Jstopper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,488
Reaction score
8,007
Nope.

Give me a title first.
Your idea can follow AFTER.

Besides... What the pats do is.... Amazing .... Questionable.... An anomaly by nfl parity standards.

It's unreasonable to strive for that.

Get the bling. First!

True but the Patriots hadn't won a championship in 10 years before they won back in February. We don't want to be 1 hit wonders like the Buccaneers (2002) and been trash ever since. I'd rather be like the Pats, even though it had been a decade since they won, at least they were always in the playoffs, in the hunt. I think that's a better formula than getting the championship 1 time, and falling back into irrelevance.
 
Top