Article: NFL.com Dallas wont make the playoffs

It all depends on what the defense does in my opinion. It's probably unlikely that we'll have near-perfect health on offense again, at least in terms of avoiding a long term injury to a top-tier starter. While I think the running game will remain a definite strength it's also probably unlikely to expect talks of a 2,000 yard rusher on the team. Which means you aren't going to get away with the smoke-and-mirrors hiding of defensive weakness in 2015 that you could in 2014. However, you have two Pro Bowl caliber players in Hardy and Lee who you'd hope if healthy and productive would negate that issue. I still like the team to contend for a NFC Championship, but I don't think it's blasphemy after one playoff appearance in five years and two playoff wins in the Roma-era to assume playoffs automatically for the team either.
 
Glad the article told me now, whew! I hope more and more articles come out like last year and say we're going 6-10 again. That was fun. The deafening silence was even more fun when we just kept winning.

I also clicked on the article expecting the DeMarco Murray stuff to be the reason why. Wasn't disappointed.

I can't believe there's all this consternation over a running back, LOL.
 
REDVOLUTION said:
Nope.

Give me a title first.
Your idea can follow AFTER.

Besides... What the pats do is.... Amazing .... Questionable.... An anomaly by nfl parity standards.

It's unreasonable to strive for that.

Get the bling. First!
Click to expand...

I speak for myself and of course I want SB I also want what I see in GB and NE which is a team who puts themselves in position to get those titles and to avoid being 1 year wonders.
 
Where do they find these idiots at, the must be an idiot breeding camp hidden somewhere. ESPN, NFLN to a degree, and now NFL.com has priority to pick them.
I never heard seen, read where anyone in saying McFadden is a secret weapon. Eagles rebuilt? As well as other things about other teams. This guy is delusional. Trying to make a name for himself getting the clicks early.
another mediot hack.
 
Good..I'm glad we are getting underrated going into the season from all of these supposed "Sports Gurus" again. I would hate to be overrated like the Eagles and Colts are right now.

Also, can't they keep their narrative consistent for once? All last year it was the Offensive line that was keeping Romo upright with "8 pockets" pockets and blowing holes large enough that "any running back" can skip through, to now we are losing our offensive potency just because Murray left. And according to them, a rookie RB can't come in and have immediate success? Yeah...thanks, handyman. <makes waving action>

My prediction is that only if we we pick up AP or Gurley (neither of which will probably happen), we will go into the season with the media underrating us to an 8-8/9-7 record, losing the division to the Eagles and missing out on the Wild Card game. Good...I want to see them eat crow again.
 
Last edited:
I honestly think the Giants will be better than the Eagles. Both behind the Cowboys though. Yes, we lost Murray but we still have the line that gave him all that running room to begin with. Adding what we did on Defense, I'm pretty stoked about this team. Let the media hype the Eagles again.
 
BrAinPaiNt said:
There is the possibility.

However I don't get the Chip Kelly's revamp Eagles team line....they might have improved their defense but they gutted their offense...I don't know if Revamped is the word I would use.
Click to expand...

If by "revamped" he means committing nearly $60 million in contracts to his backfield (not including the QB position), have a QB made of glass lead his team for a FULL SEASON while throwing to a non-existant WR core...then yeah, I guess they're "revamped"!?! LMBO!!!
 
So it's unclear to me. Does this mean that we should or we should not show up for the games? I guess we should probably show up anyway. See what happens I guess.
 
I have no issue with this writers opinion I don't agree with him but I will say Cowboys can't take it for granted. The Cowboys have been picked to go to a SB at the start of a season only to turn around and not even make the post season. Cowboys have the talent to make it they have to continue to show the will and determination to make it happen.
As Romo said himself there are no sure things entering a season
 
Damn NFL.com ruined my season what is the point of watching the Cowboys now that they won't be in the playoffs.
 
Doomsday101 said:
I speak for myself and of course I want SB I also want what I see in GB and NE which is a team who puts themselves in position to get those titles and to avoid being 1 year wonders.
Click to expand...

Jstopper said:
True but the Patriots hadn't won a championship in 10 years before they won back in February. We don't want to be 1 hit wonders like the Buccaneers (2002) and been trash ever since. I'd rather be like the Pats, even though it had been a decade since they won, at least they were always in the playoffs, in the hunt. I think that's a better formula than getting the championship 1 time, and falling back into irrelevance.
Click to expand...



I actually don't disagree with either of you really.
I just don't know if you can have it both ways.


For me, I need that 6th.

Primarily - For stealer reasons. Heh heh
49ers - gifted #5 by Jerry jones

Secondarily - giants and pats have 4 - too close





Then if we do that... I get on board with going ahead of stealers with #7

:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 7,222 (members: 30, guests: 7,192)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,658
Messages
13,824,766
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top