- Messages
- 78,736
- Reaction score
- 43,205
Nahhhhh ....... lets take the WPA
Nahhhhh ....... lets take the WPA
It would depend if 1 of those blue chippers fall, but I still believe it is going to be very hard for them to pass on Jeanty. I'm putting my chips in for a difference making DT, but they might view it otherwise. Cannot ignore the financial aspect of drafting Jeanty, either.That's just it........I think he's admitting Zeke was an extreme exception to the rule. In other words, I don't see them drafting Jeanty inside 10. Perhaps a trade down into the teens but not inside 10.
I am one of the few who liked the pick of Zeke, he made a huge impact, but Garrett had no idea how to manage his workload. Could of lasted longer. I could live with taking Jeanty, but would prefer to take advantage of this deep running back class.And won 13 games the next year.
And how many SBs?And won 13 games the next year.
What if it's a TE?At 10 take bpa. Mason Graham, Tet McMillan, or Ashton Jeanty. One could be there.
It would depend if 1 of those blue chippers fall, but I still believe it is going to be very hard for them to pass on Jeanty. I'm putting my chips in for a difference making DT, but they might view it otherwise. Cannot ignore the financial aspect of drafting Jeanty, either.
I agree the position is very hit or miss, but the bigger issue is the long, developmental curve. They were trying to run Q. Williams out of NY early in his career and now he is one of the best in the entire league. What we need is a dominate run defender first and can wait on them developing as a pass rusher. Now couldn't you do that with someone outside the top rd? Absolutely, but there is a bigger bust rate there. In any fashion, the team is going to have to either resign Osa or sign a replacement starter, ALONG with another 1T.https://overthecap.com/position/interior-defensive-line
Here is my issue with drafting DTs, ..........the value of their impact is hard to understand when considering where they are drafted, contracts, team W/Ls, and dominants as run defenders. For example......take a look at the top 10 DTs contracts.
*** 8 were selected in the 1st round
*** 2 were selected in 2nd and 3rd rounds
Raiders, Jets, Titans, Colts, Commanders and Giants have had little or NO success even getting to the playoffs, let alone the Super Bowl.
In other words, their impact is hard to predict, especially first 2-3 years. Say you draft one with 12........are drafting
** the next Jaden Carter/Aaron Donald.......
** Chris Jones.....dominant but was a 2nd round pick
** Derrick Brown....Damn good player but his team has won anything
** DeForest Buckner....7th overall but playing with his 2nd team
** Mazi Smith.......freak athlete may or may not get a 2nd contract offer
My other issue .....what are we really looking for.......1 tech or 3 tech. Correct me if I'm wrong but we need a big nasty 1 tech who is a solid run defender ( see Jordan Davis ). Hell, I think Zimm even admitted he needed some NTs. Which tells me he's not concerned about sacks from the position as much as run defender and keeping his LBers clean.
This is why unless I can get a REASONABLE guarantee I'm getting J Carter or A Donald.......I would much rather sign a free agent AND draft one outside the 1st round ( Deone Walker ....2nd fro example )
I agree but Zeke caught them off guard with his demand for a new contract after only his 3rd year where he led the league in rushing. Now I ask you, here's your 4th overall draft pick, who just completed his 3rd year at the top of his position, demanding a new contract or he will sit out the number of games allowed by CBA. You don't have a replacement ........what would you have done?And how many SBs?
Zeke was a fine player for a few years for us but in the end, it was likely a mistake using a Top 5 pick on a RB. They compounded the problem by signing him to a stupid contract they are still eating.
In a nutshell.........go find me a 325lb+ dominant run defender who understands AND embraces his priorities as stopping the run AND keeping my LBers clean, stats be damned. Interestingly I've heard a couple of former league insiders say this is easier said than done coz every DLine knows sacks mean money. It's not unusual to see DTs neglecting their run responsibilities for sacks.I agree the position is very hit or miss, but the bigger issue is the long, developmental curve. They were trying to run Q. Williams out of NY early in his career and now he is one of the best in the entire league. What we need is a dominate run defender first and can wait on them developing as a pass rusher. Now couldn't you do that with someone outside the top rd? Absolutely, but there is a bigger bust rate there. In any fashion, the team is going to have to either resign Osa or sign a replacement starter, ALONG with another 1T.
Gibbs and Robinson aren't superstarsI am out on Jeanty.
He's great but I don't see a superstar type like a Gibbs or Robinson.
I'd rather use that high pick on DL help and then come back in the 2nd or 3rd round with a TB, like either of the OSU TBs, for example.
It isn't.What if it's a TE?
Going 13 and 3 wasn't a mistake.And how many SBs?
Zeke was a fine player for a few years for us but in the end, it was likely a mistake using a Top 5 pick on a RB. They compounded the problem by signing him to a stupid contract they are still eating.
A lot of people loved the pick and it worked beautifully in 2016.I am one of the few who liked the pick of Zeke, he made a huge impact, but Garrett had no idea how to manage his workload. Could of lasted longer. I could live with taking Jeanty, but would prefer to take advantage of this deep running back class.
Graham, Harmon, Grant, Williams are all considered high end run defenders, what will ultimately separate them is whose become the best pass rusher. If we truly want just a run NT, a player like Corleone would be an ideal fit after the 1st rd.In a nutshell.........go find me a 325lb+ dominant run defender who understands AND embraces his priorities as stopping the run AND keeping my LBers clean, stats be damned. Interestingly I've heard a couple of former league insiders say this is easier said than done coz every DLine knows sacks mean money. It's not unusual to see DTs neglecting their run responsibilities for sacks.
LOL, he did not catch them off guard. He had been conveying for months what he was going to do.I agree but Zeke caught them off guard with his demand for a new contract after only his 3rd year where he led the league in rushing. Now I ask you, here's your 4th overall draft pick, who just completed his 3rd year at the top of his position, demanding a new contract or he will sit out the number of games allowed by CBA. You don't have a replacement ........what would you have done?
* call his bluff and let him sit out
* trade him
* new contract
Where do the Cowboys show the 13-3 trophy that they got that year? Is it in The Star?Going 13 and 3 wasn't a mistake.
Trade down.At 10 take bpa.
Maybe, or just take best player.Trade down.