DIAF;3974817 said:
It doesnt surprise me that you aren't able to grasp this simple concept, I guess.
Your argument about batting average (getting a hit) being the most important thing in "run production"....anyone can get a hit and drive in a run if there are runners on and in scoring position, heck you don't even NEED a hit to score a run...hitters can chase home a run on a fly ball sacrifice, fielders' choice, base on balls....shoot, you dont even need a hit to get on base. A BB will suffice.
RBI is a function of the on base skill of the hitters in the lineup in front of you. Its more about opportunity than skill. If you are a .250 hitter with average power but the guys in front of you do a good job of getting on base, then you are going to have a lot of opportunities to knock in runs despite your mediocre bat.
This demonstrates that OBP (and OPS) are far more important metrics than Batting Average for "run production". Or wOBA, if you prefer.
But oh, you are oh-so-old-school and math has no place in the game! It's all about getting those baseball-card stats!
Its actually pretty simple, and you still won't understand it because you'll over think it some more, but as i have said from the beginning..
The players who hit consistently and therefore have high batting averages most seasons, and the players who drive home the most runs every season are the ones that are the most valuable and who command the biggest contracts. Bottom line.
Tell me about all your other stats and yada yada yada.. the guys who get on base, and the guys who knock home the runs are the most important.
Anyone can get a hit and drive in a run, yet some do consistently, and some don't.
Just like anyone can get on base, yet some do consistently, and some don't.
Your logic is like that of a 5 year old. Of course anyone can do something, but most don't.