Audio: Wade Phillips: ‘Defensive’ Guru, lol.

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
ShiningStar;3017632 said:
Owens: 12 for 202 1 TD Avg 16.8


Austin: 15 for 331 yards 3 TD's Avg 22.1

Bills 1-4

Cowboys 3-2



So far its working out okay.
Simple minds are easily satisfied.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
ShiningStar;3017808 said:
and we still lost. so Wade inherited a team that went 1 and done twice and he did it once? Are you saying for him to be as good as you want, he has to one and done twice in the playoffs?

I'm saying it was a team capable of making the playoffs, and in fact being a muffed FG away from winning in the playoffs. Don't act like Wade did some sort of reconstruction project here, he inherited a lot of talent.

This was not Wade's team that he took to a 13-3 record, it was Bill's. And its been a .500 ball club since that couldn't even get in last year because they completely and totally bottomed out 44-6 in a must win game. Yay coach.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
Bleu Star;3017824 said:
Simple minds are easily satisfied.


Kinda of like how you felt Scandrick should start instead of Jenkins because you seen Scandrick play alrite a few times, but when his stage came up he failed. That kind of simple mind? Is that what you speak of?

:lmao::lmao2::lmao2::lmao:
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
wileedog;3017828 said:
I'm saying it was a team capable of making the playoffs, and in fact being a muffed FG away from winning in the playoffs. Don't act like Wade did some sort of reconstruction project here, he inherited a lot of talent.

This was not Wade's team that he took to a 13-3 record, it was Bill's. And its been a .500 ball club since that couldn't even get in last year because they completely and totally bottomed out 44-6 in a must win game. Yay coach.


So after 1 good season, that was Bills team, than after that, its wades team? Ohhhhh kay. So when Bills defense failed, and Wade takes over and this year has been getting better and better, is that still Bills D, or if it sucks is it Wades? Whats the cut off on wins and losses, that its Bills team vs Wades team?
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
ShiningStar;3017830 said:
Kinda of like how you felt Scandrick should start instead of Jenkins because you seen Scandrick play alrite a few times, but when his stage came up he failed. That kind of simple mind? Is that what you speak of?

:lmao::lmao2::lmao2::lmao:

Wow. That mind really is a terrible thing to waste. Scandrick and Jenkins are the future at corner for the team. I'm not sure it's possible to simplify that any further for you. Alrite? :muttley:
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
ShiningStar;3017834 said:
So after 1 good season, that was Bills team, than after that, its wades team? Ohhhhh kay. So when Bills defense failed, and Wade takes over and this year has been getting better and better, is that still Bills D, or if it sucks is it Wades? Whats the cut off on wins and losses, that its Bills team vs Wades team?

Bum? Is that you?
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
ShiningStar;3017834 said:
So after 1 good season, that was Bills team, than after that, its wades team? Ohhhhh kay. So when Bills defense failed, and Wade takes over and this year has been getting better and better, is that still Bills D, or if it sucks is it Wades? Whats the cut off on wins and losses, that its Bills team vs Wades team?

I don't know, was it Wade or Bill's defense that collapsed last year against the Ravens and Eagles?

Which one almost lost to the Chiefs last week, letting one of the worst offenses in football drive down the field in the last few minutes?

Again, you made the comment that this wasn't a playoff team when Wade got here. Please enlighten me how Wade has made it better the past 2 and half years. Because last year sucked out loud and this one ain't looking much better.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
wileedog;3017849 said:
I don't know, was it Wade or Bill's defense that collapsed last year against the Ravens and Eagles?

Which one almost lost to the Chiefs last week, letting one of the worst offenses in football drive down the field in the last few minutes?

Again, you made the comment that this wasn't a playoff team when Wade got here. Please enlighten me how Wade has made it better the past 2 and half years. Because last year sucked out loud and this one ain't looking much better.


Well lets see, both the Giants and Dallas have started out real hot and except for a freak year, the Giants are not any more impressive than Dallas is right now.

As for the offseason when I kept hearing how every team stacks against Dallas and not the Giants.

I actually prefer this defense to Bills and I am not just saying that, I remember this board screaming for a more sacking defense than what Bill brought us when he switched us from a 4-3 to a 3-4 which i was against of from the beginning.

I like this offense a lot more also, I feel its more explosive and has more potiental than Bills standard of Time of Possesion and grind the ball out.

I dont like Wade Wilson as the QB coach, but since people are so simple minded and only focus on things they can see or what they are told they cant see the forest from the tree they are staring at.

If you go and look at Romo while WW was suspeneded, I think Romo played much better.

I also dont see why we keep Bret Maxie. I understand why we keep Skip Peete, but his and Shermans technique of allowing our players to keep swiveling their heads while they are running is getting annoying.

I think our problems is more focused on the cogs no one sees, instead of the big two.

I think our drafting is better post Bill Parcells, yes I like two of the players he got us, but we cant get over the flops he brought in as well.

I like how Wade doesnt give the media anything and still deals with them more professional than Parcells did.

I like wades offseason a lot more and I like how he brings a friendlier environment for the players, who many believe in.

I like that we got rid of Adeloye and Fasano we all know Pacman was Jerry's doing, not Wades.

But you know, for all Bill Parcells brought us, well, we accomplished just as much, so big comparison there.

Also, just because you fall into teh playoffs doesnt mean you are a playoff team, just means a lot of the teams in the NFl just sucked. Because a lot of people play the "look at the teams they play against" debate, you know it.

Anyone can say "you play your schedule" and thats all well and good, but when the Giants cant beat 1 good team in teh season, fall into the playoffs and decide to play 4 games that season to win teh SB, you have proven that falling into the playoffs is just as good as fighting to get into the playoffs.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
ShiningStar;3017867 said:
Well lets see, both the Giants and Dallas have started out real hot and except for a freak year, the Giants are not any more impressive than Dallas is right now.
.

I stopped there.

Good day sir.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
ShiningStar;3017892 said:
Why because it doesnt work with your arguement?

Because you and I are obviously watching a different football league, and arguing with the wall seems like a better use of my time.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
6,160
ShiningStar;3017808 said:
and we still lost. so Wade inherited a team that went 1 and done twice and he did it once? Are you saying for him to be as good as you want, he has to one and done twice in the playoffs?

Parcells turned a talentless 15-33 team into a 2-time playoff contender with an upward trajectory in just 4 years. Fat Wade just hitched onto the gravy train and wore out it's bearings with his inertia - like he has done with every team he has coached - he was done as a HC years ago, no other owner but idiot Jerry would have hired him, he will never coach again after this year, other than letting the line rush the passer, he has added nothing to this team.

BTW, Parcells had become too conservative as a gameday coach IMO, but his contribution to this organization is indisputable - namely that, as was the case when Jimmy was here, a real coach with a degree of control will trump any of Jerry's Byzantine coaching committees / puppets / yesmen anyday.
 

bayeslife

187beatdown
Messages
9,461
Reaction score
8,584
Doomsay;3018241 said:
Parcells turned a talentless 15-33 team into a 2-time playoff contender with an upward trajectory in just 4 years. Fat Wade just hitched onto the gravy train and wore out it's bearings with his inertia - like he has done with every team he has coached - he was done as a HC years ago, no other owner but idiot Jerry would have hired him, he will never coach again after this year, other than letting the line rush the passer, he has added nothing to this team.

That's funny, I recall Parcells winning the same amount of playoff games as Wade has during his tenure here.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
187beatdown;3018254 said:
That's funny, I recall Parcells winning the same amount of playoff games as Wade has during his tenure here.

Lame argument. Do you really believe Wade sniffs the playoffs over 4 years if he came here in 2003?
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
wileedog;3018269 said:
Lame argument. Do you really believe Wade sniffs the playoffs over 4 years if he came here in 2003?


can you prove he cant?
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
6,160
187beatdown;3018254 said:
That's funny, I recall Parcells winning the same amount of playoff games as Wade has during his tenure here.

What's funny here, is a presumption of football knowledge in the post.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
6,160
ShiningStar;3018298 said:
can you prove he cant?

Look at the relevant histories and figure it out. Wade has never improved a team under his tenure or won a playoff contest. Go ahead,
try to wiggle out of it, you have nothing here.

BTW, it would be: "could you prove that he couldn't (have)" :rolleyes:
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
Doomsay;3018451 said:
Look at the relevant histories and figure it out. Wade has never improved a team under his tenure or won a playoff contest. Go ahead,
try to wiggle out of it, you have nothing here.

BTW, it would be: "could you prove that he couldn't (have)" :rolleyes:


OMG the IF game where no one losses, yeah great way to have a conversation.

Just give it up already, Wade isnt as bad as people want him to be.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
6,160
ShiningStar;3018472 said:
OMG the IF game where no one losses, yeah great way to have a conversation.
Wow.



Just give it up already, Wade isnt as bad as people want him to be.

Pretty sure people on this board want him to be good, problem is, he isn't and you don't have the data to prove otherwise.
 
Top