trickblue;3201306 said:Saw it today... very stylish but over rated...
It's basically "Dances With Wolves" using CGI... seriously...
Don't get me wrong, it was good, just not one of the greats of all times...
Maikeru-sama;3243791 said:Bizzare indeed.
Proof that all you need is Marketing, Special Effects and blow a ton of things up and people will flock to see it.
As far as a plot and acting, Avatar isn't in The Dark Knight's league.
None of the actors in Avatar will win an Oscar.
Maikeru-sama;3243791 said:Bizzare indeed.
Proof that all you need is Marketing, Special Effects and blow a ton of things up and people will flock to see it.
As far as a plot and acting, Avatar isn't in The Dark Knight's league.
None of the actors in Avatar will win an Oscar.
nyc;3243938 said:Yeah, Christian Bale as Batman was a quality job. Every single actor in Avatar was 2x better than Bale's acting job as Batman in TDK.
He was far and away the WORST Batman I've ever seen. He wasn't just bad. He straight up sucked. When he would talk in his "low" voice, I wanted to reach into the screen and physically choke him.
Maikeru-sama;3244100 said:Avatar was the 3 Star Wars Prequels with just better Special Effects.
No interesting characters and an extremely medicore plot.
The Dark Knight was extremely entertaining and Heath Ledger did the unthinkable and played the Joker better then Jack Nicholson did.
But hey, Avatar can help solve vision problems
http://digg.com/d31G1v3
You really couldn't be more wrong.nyc;3243782 said:IMO, Avatar is a better movie than TDK. While I thought TDK was good, I thought 90% of it's overblown hype was the fact that Heath Ledger had died.
theogt;3244670 said:You really couldn't be more wrong.
nyc;3244139 said:Are you trying to become the next DaBoys4Life? Ignore lists are waiting.
Maikeru-sama;3244775 said:Put me on your ignore list all you wont.
I really could care less.
You're going to put someone on ignore because they disagree with you about a movie? :laugh2:nyc;3244880 said:Yes, I will! :laugh2:
Cover 2;3245034 said:You're going to put someone on ignore because they disagree with you about a movie? :laugh2:
There will be a "regular" Blu-Ray and then Cameron will come out with a 3-D edition once the 3-D players and TV's become available this year.bbgun;3245262 said:So when this movie goes to DVD, will it come with a pair of 3-D glasses? Or can you only get that effect in a conventional theater?
mldardy;3245284 said:There will be a "regular" Blu-Ray and then Cameron will come out with a 3-D edition once the 3-D players and TV's become available this year.
http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=3932
nyc;3244750 said:Opinions aren't wrong, they're just different. I just didn't find TDK as good as everyone else seem to think it was. Of course, I thought Iron Man sucked *** and some how it was this *big movie* too. /shrug
This is the BS that public schools feed children to make themselves feel warm and fuzzy. We're all special. All opinions are valued.nyc;3244750 said:Opinions aren't wrong, they're just different. I just didn't find TDK as good as everyone else seem to think it was. Of course, I thought Iron Man sucked *** and some how it was this *big movie* too. /shrug