Faerluna;3245826 said:
Faerluna;3245826 said:
No, the ignore was based on repeating the same **** 400 times when nobody ask his opinion the last 399 times. Some people can't figure **** out.ScipioCowboy;3245727 said:Apparently, however, they're ignore-worthy offenses.
theogt;3245746 said:This is the BS that public schools feed children to make themselves feel warm and fuzzy. We're all special. All opinions are valued.
Bull. ****. Some opinions are patently stupid. And your opinion in this regard fits the bill.
Faerluna;3245826 said:
Faerluna;3245826 said:
theogt;3245746 said:This is the BS that public schools feed children to make themselves feel warm and fuzzy. We're all special. All opinions are valued.
Bull. ****. Some opinions are patently stupid. And your opinion in this regard fits the bill.
TheCount;3246065 said:lol, that was the first thing I said to my friend after I saw Avatar, it's basically Pocahontas and he said Dances With Wolves. There's no doubt the story was simple, tried and tested, but therein lies the conundrum.
If you enjoyed the story of Pocahontas or Dances With Wolves, it's tough to say that Avatar has a bad plot. It's just a played out one.
Maikeru-sama;3246149 said:So now I have to get permission before I can offer my opinion?
ajk23az;3246852 said:In Cameron's defense, it was said he wrote the script 15 +/- years ago but waited to produce it until a lot more theaters actually had 3D in them so it could be displayed in a lot more places. So the script is actually 15 years old and thus why everyone thinks it sucks and has been done over and over.
ChldsPlay;3247039 said:So he wrote it while the other movies were more fresh in his memory....got it.
And I can't believe waiting for 3D is the reason to wait for it. CGI sure, because it couldn't be done 15 years ago. Nothing in the movie requires 3D though, and it doesn't benefit all that much from it.
ajk23az;3247093 said:How much do you wanna bet that most of the movies income has come from 3D theaters and not regular ones? That right there tells why he waited for more 3D theaters to open.
nyc;3247112 said:I'm not a betting man, but if I was I would take that bet in a second. Reason? There are thousands more regular theaters than there are 3D ones. Sheer volume of the others would far out produce the 3D theaters even at the $3-$4 more charged at the 3D ones.
Its also charging the double price...Mavs Man;3253053 said:After this weekend's box office count, Avatar has zoomed past $550 million domestic and into #2 all-time in North America. At $553 million, Avatar is now only $47 million away from surpassing Titanic as the #1 North American box office champion. If its current week-to-week holds continue, I'm guessing Avatar picks up another $10-12 million Monday to Thursday, and then $25-30 million over the weekend. After that, it could pass Titanic by the following Friday, or later that weekend at the latest.
Even more impressive, Avatar is now only $6 million behind Titanic for the worldwide box office mark. $6 million! That record should fall sometime tomorrow evening. It's foreign box office take has completely obliterated Titanic's.
Romo 2 Austin;3253811 said:Its also charging the double price...
Didn't it sell only 55% of the seats of Titanic thus far?
ChldsPlay;3254008 said:Not sure about the percentage, but it certainly isn't anywhere close to Titanic as far as attendance. It's all about the cost of 3D & IMAX.
When compared to Gone with the Wind, it's had about 1/3 the attendance.