Avengers 2 Age of Ultron Trailer

Ntegrase96 said:
I could be wrong because I'm just not very familiar with him, but being in acting since 78 doesn't = star.

Other than the Boston Legal, the guy hasn't been the headliner he's been hyped up to be recently,.. It's like if Cary Elwes suddenly was introduced as the star of a show as some big deal that I should be excited about.
Click to expand...

james spader is the man.... and I don't even watch blacklist.
sex, lies, & video tapes
wall street
less than zero...
he may not be a star by some definition.... but he's done some things
almost forgot " the secretary" he was really good in that.
 
Guess I'm alone on the spader thing. Though I don't think he's a bad actor. Think he's done a great job with what we've seen in this trailer.
 
As a sort of sequel to Guardians of the Galaxy, I'd love to see Annihilation, but Fox would likely never give up the rights to the Silver Surfer/Galactus, since they are part of the Fantastic Four series.
 
I actually think the trailer is pretty meh, it's mostly just a roll call, but I'm going to watch the hell out of that movie.
 
TheCount said:
I actually think the trailer is pretty meh, it's mostly just a roll call, but I'm going to watch the hell out of that movie.
Click to expand...

I wasn't bowled over either, but Marvel is the hot product, so I'm curious....

"They put him in a cape now too?!!!?"
Micheal Keaton: Birdman
 
TheCount said:
I actually think the trailer is pretty meh, it's mostly just a roll call, but I'm going to watch the hell out of that movie.
Click to expand...

After seeing it a few times, it didn't blow me away, but I do still enjoy Ultron at the end. I think they cast a great voice for him. I'm really glad they didn't go with something that sounded far too much like a machine.
 
TheCount said:
I actually think the trailer is pretty meh, it's mostly just a roll call, but I'm going to watch the hell out of that movie.
Click to expand...

Ha, I did too. But I also remember the first avengers trailer... It was pretty up impressive. Seemed hurried.

They threw out too much action for the first trailer if you ask me. We've still got half a year to go for this film, probably 2 more trailers.
 
The most recent Marvel: Agents of SHIELD episode had a sneak peak clip of this film at the very end.
 
Manwiththeplan said:
As a sort of sequel to Guardians of the Galaxy, I'd love to see Annihilation, but Fox would likely never give up the rights to the Silver Surfer/Galactus, since they are part of the Fantastic Four series.
Click to expand...

Why doesn't Disney, make some outrageous offer to Fox/Sony for X-Men/F4/Spiderman? We all know, they would be able to make the money back.
 
The problem is Fox and Sony know that these franchises will continue to be cash cows, thus there is little incentive to sell.
 
CashMan said:
Why doesn't Disney, make some outrageous offer to Fox/Sony for X-Men/F4/Spiderman? We all know, they would be able to make the money back.
Click to expand...

I don't think that Marvel is willing to pay the billions it would likely take to get back what they likely feel is "theirs".

I'm hopeful of an agreement being reached to 'share' Spiderman, but every thing I've have read and heard says that their relationship with Fox (X-Men and FF) is pretty toxic.
 
stasheroo said:
I don't think that Marvel is willing to pay the billions it would likely take to get back what they likely feel is "theirs".

I'm hopeful of an agreement being reached to 'share' Spiderman, but every thing I've have read and heard says that their relationship with Fox (X-Men and FF) is pretty toxic.
Click to expand...

They own some pretty big franchises, Star Wars and Marvel, I doubt a few billion, would set them back, and you see how successful their movies are. Adding a few more franchises to that, would make their money back.
 
CashMan said:
They own some pretty big franchises, Star Wars and Marvel, I doubt a few billion, would set them back, and you see how successful their movies are. Adding a few more franchises to that, would make their money back.
Click to expand...

Considering Disney paid $4 billion for Star Wars, "a few billion" seems like an awful lot merely to regain film rights to characters you already own.

I could see them possibly getting an arrangement done for Spider Man, but Fox is making too much money to give up X-Men right now and FF at this point isn't worth much in getting back.

After this next attempt bombs, Fox may be so discouraged that they may just let the rights expire and go back to Marvel for nothing like Daredevil, Blade, Punisher, and Ghost Rider did.

But I don't see them paying "a few billion" in any way, shape, or form.
 
stasheroo said:
Considering Disney paid $4 billion for Star Wars, "a few billion" seems like an awful lot merely to regain film rights to characters you already own.

I could see them possibly getting an arrangement done for Spider Man, but Fox is making too much money to give up X-Men right now and FF at this point isn't worth much in getting back.

After this next attempt bombs, Fox may be so discouraged that they may just let the rights expire and go back to Marvel for nothing like Daredevil, Blade, Punisher, and Ghost Rider did.

But I don't see them paying "a few billion" in any way, shape, or form.
Click to expand...


Remember during the lean spiderweb years... Spidey was the electric company. Morgan freeman was the cop....
 
Manwiththeplan said:
The problem is Fox and Sony know that these franchises will continue to be cash cows, thus there is little incentive to sell.
Click to expand...

But sharing rights to a character could help all parties involved in my opinion. If Spiderman were allowed to show up in an Avengers movie, then maybe more people would follow Spidey's stand alone films.
 
REDVOLUTION said:
Remember during the lean spiderweb years... Spidey was the electric company. Morgan freeman was the cop....
Click to expand...

I yeah. I remember all of that 'classic stuff'.

Reb Brown as Captain America, Dolph Lundgren's Punisher.

How about that Fantastic Four movie that never was?
 
stasheroo said:
Considering Disney paid $4 billion for Star Wars, "a few billion" seems like an awful lot merely to regain film rights to characters you already own.

I could see them possibly getting an arrangement done for Spider Man, but Fox is making too much money to give up X-Men right now and FF at this point isn't worth much in getting back.

After this next attempt bombs, Fox may be so discouraged that they may just let the rights expire and go back to Marvel for nothing like Daredevil, Blade, Punisher, and Ghost Rider did.

But I don't see them paying "a few billion" in any way, shape, or form.
Click to expand...

agree by the end of Avengers 3, i don't doubt that most of the Marvel movie licenses will belong to Disney with the exception of maybe X-Men
 
BanditHiro said:
agree by the end of Avengers 3, i don't doubt that most of the Marvel movie licenses will belong to Disney with the exception of maybe X-Men
Click to expand...

And if Inhumans proves to be the X-Men replacement Marvel is hoping, they won't be too worried about paying big money to get the mutants back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 16 more.
Total: 777 (members: 116, guests: 661)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,600
Messages
13,885,532
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top