MountaineerCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 29,389
- Reaction score
- 72,878
The polls tells me that even if the WRs had great separate Dak would miss them anyways.
Thanks, OP!
Thanks, OP!
No it doesn't because I never argued Daks accuracy. This was only to show how much McCarthy system sucks and is outdated. Every team in the top right corner has a Shanny tree coordinator. That isn't a coincidence.it certainly does create an issue for his argument.....
barely, or are we designing plays to get him open???You mean our 34 mil WR can't get open?
a guy with 3 guys covering has a great chance in our offense to make a great play lolIs this just for those he threw to, or does it apply to all WRs for each play? In other words, does it account for a QB who missed the open WR and threw to a covered one instead?
Maybe the McCarthy system works if you don't have to dumb it down to play to the QBs physical and mental limitations.No it doesn't because I never argued Daks accuracy. This was only to show how much McCarthy system sucks and is outdated. Every team in the top right corner has a Shanny tree coordinator. That isn't a coincidence.
Not really, because the x- and y-axis are just relative scores. They aren't measuring actual accuracy.it certainly does create an issue for his argument.....
So the takeaway is, this stat grid posted by a noted Dak defender is totally accurate in the stats that provide cover for Dak, but on the stats that reflect poorly on Dak it's not trustworthy.Not really, because the x- and y-axis are just relative scores. They aren't measuring actual accuracy.
I have no idea how "accuracy" is defined here, but Dak is still at ~70% on target. Jalen Hurts is ~34%, Mahomes is at ~82% for comparison, per p-f-r.
No, the takeaway is that you don't know how to read. Go ahead and tell me what the numbers on the y-axis mean, and then you'll have a point.So the takeaway is, this stat grid posted by a noted Dak defender is totally accurate in the stats that provide cover for Dak, but on the stats that reflect poorly on Dak it's not trustworthy.
Got it.
I agree. Its not that all our wrs are slow and run bad routes. Cooks is better than plenty of teams wr2. Mikes offense cannot run the ball or scheme receivers open. If he cannot win playoff games either, he is bringing zero to the table at this point.This is exactly what I meant about other teams making it easy on their QB while we just ask Dak to be superman and win with no separation. Get me a real coordinator like the Saints have.
All wr every play
you admitted that it doesn't show Dak being accurate.No, the takeaway is that you don't know how to read. Go ahead and tell me what the numbers on the y-axis mean, and then you'll have a point.
Nobody said it shows Dak being accurate.
I didn't say the data is inaccurate.you admitted that it doesn't show Dak being accurate.
Then proceeded to say the data is inaccurate.
As I said, your point is, data that shows dak in a positive light = good.
Data that shows negatively on Dak = bad.
I read just fine. And so do you. That's why you're spending time discounting data you don't like and insulting the comprehension skills of those who are interpreting said data accurately
Hard to get open when they realize he's the only one the QB is going to throw to, doubled or not.You mean our 34 mil WR can't get open?
KI didn't say the data is inaccurate.
Like I said, you don't know how to read.
And the worst RB group in the NFL.How many times do I have to keep telling you guys that this WR corps is terrible?
They have 0 speed 0 talent after CD.