MyFairLady
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,257
- Reaction score
- 7,589
When your running QB refuses to run problems will surely follow.
This ^^When your running QB refuses to run problems will surely follow.
You offer an interesting introspective on how to fix the offense, however, your spectacle offers two issues at hand—It will be interesting to revisit an updated version of this chart in a couple of weeks. Part of the separation issue could be from the super quick passing attack they used against Cleveland. Better OL play moving forward could be a sneaky way to help these receivers as well.
lol. i surely hope you're trolling. otherwise, yikes.you admitted that it doesn't show Dak being accurate.
Then proceeded to say the data is inaccurate.
As I said, your point is, data that shows dak in a positive light = good.
Data that shows negatively on Dak = bad.
I read just fine. And so do you. That's why you're spending time discounting data you don't like and insulting the comprehension skills of those who are interpreting said data accurately
polls? what!?The polls tells me that even if the WRs had great separate Dak would miss them anyways.
Thanks, OP!
Said the same thing about the defense after the GB, get me a better defensive coordinator and the Cowboys will show their worth on Sundays. Well, Zim looked destroyed on the sidelines last Sunday. He had no answers to fix what is broken on HIS defense. I've watched and listened to far too many football experts that backed Prescott and his outrageous contract demands, that backed this organization with the players that are on both the offense and defense. Now all of a sudden these so-called experts are calling this team SOFT, SOFT as Charmin Toilet Paper! Prescott didn't deserve a raise to $60 a year, he's proving to be a lousy QB when times get tough, the dude's passes are all over the place, he won't throw a deep ball anymore because 99.9 % of his deep passes aren't catchable. I watched Carr in the pocket last Sunday and even under pressure he was able to deliver, which is something Prescott has major issues with and let's not forget about all those FGs the Cowboys had to go for because the offense kept stalling out. When you are the highest paid at your position at least leave a little blood, sweat and tears on the field when you are done.............. Beating toads by double digits doesn't get a pass anymore when you can't deliver against the average clubs in the NFL. Somebody needs to inform Prescott that CeeDee isn't the only target on the field, spread the ball around, it might help.........This is exactly what I meant about other teams making it easy on their QB while we just ask Dak to be superman and win with no separation. Get me a real coordinator like the Saints have.
huh?When your running QB refuses to run problems will surely follow.
hmm, 65% this year. 69% last year.... is the accuracy bad?Below average separation and below average accuracy.
Not good.
oh, you left out the FB from your list.The two issues are not mutually exclusive.
Dak is simply mediocre. Not worth 60 mil. You could get this man Tyreek Hill, Ceedee, Justin Jefferson, and Cooper Kupp all on one team and he’d still fail to step up to elite caliber.
The WR corp is absolutely horrid as well. Just downright disparaging.
The offense as a whole is horrendous. The QB, the O-line, the WR, and especially the RB room. I’ve been said the offensive roster needs to be overhauled.
Maybe the teams he defeated didn't score more than 20 because he sustained drives, kept field position favorable, gave the D time to rest, engaged more than 1 receiver, kept us in front or kept us close and made key plays when needed, avoided turnovers & thus point off turnovers. In other words, the non sexy things that go into being a good QB.cooper rush lost the first time the opposing team scored more than 20...
but keep having wet dreams of cooper rush.
Yes. For example his stat line early in the game last week were things like 4\4 - 25 yards. Meanwhile stats from around the league were like 3/4 - 62 yards & a TD.hmm, 65% this year. 69% last year.... is the accuracy bad?
actually you would be wrong. Rush was 22nd or worse in every statistical category including time of posession.....Maybe the teams he defeated didn't score more than 20 because he sustained drives, kept field position favorable, gave the D time to rest, engaged more than 1 receiver, kept us in front or kept us close and made key plays when needed, avoided turnovers & thus point off turnovers. In other words, the non sexy things that go into being a good QB.
yet, in 23 he was 6th in YPA and 4th in AYPA, in 21 he was 10th in YPA, and 7th in AYPA...Yes. For example his stat line early in the game last week were things like 4\4 - 25 yards. Meanwhile stats from around the league were like 3/4 - 62 yards & a TD.
The bulk of his completions are often high percentage short passes or wide open longer completions.
When there was nothing there little bro used to take off and make something happen. He was a tank with a reasonable arm. He was a QB draw wizard especially in the end zone. He kept the whole defense honest. His mobility was the best part of his game. He was a fearsome competitor in 2016 and the entire team fed off him.huh?
He most definitely spread the ball around to Ced Wilson who had long reception maybe even TD against Vikings that sorta broke the game open. I also believe Noah was still here at that time and was involved. The offense had better flow and defenses weren't simply able to focus on a player to beat us.actually you would be wrong. Rush was 22nd or worse in every statistical category including time of posession.....
I also looked at the catches by recievers and how it was spread around and really not much different. actualy dak spread it more evenly.
so both assumptions are wrong.
the defense played great. they actually scored a couple of times as well. averaged about 13 points a game....give me that defense and I can get us to 9-8.....