I feel like Bain is a much bigger need, but Downs role in our defense would be huge. I think he'd become the backbone of what we do. He also seems like a much safer choice.Certainly possible both of these guys could be there at 12. If you stick and pick, who do you take?? I keep going back and forth. Downs is probably higher on our board but damn Bain is a beast.
Yeah either way id be ecstatic, and slightly disappointed for who we didnt take.Literally a dream scenario, either or
Downs is NOT Just a box safetyBain easily
An empact Edge >>> box safety
You think Downs is able to cover someone like Bowers 1-on-1?Downs is NOT Just a box safety
he did plenty of good work in coverage
not sure why this narrative keeps popping up
Bro Downs is not a box safety lol that’s insaneYou think Downs is able to cover someone like Bowers 1-on-1?
No Safety is going to be able to cover a top WR 1 on 1You think Downs is able to cover someone like Bowers 1-on-1?
Disagree. We don’t have the perfect nickel player right now, the most important position on D. We have options but none of them are ideal. Give me DownsI feel like Bain is a much bigger need, but Downs role in our defense would be huge. I think he'd become the backbone of what we do. He also seems like a much safer choice.
To answer your question, I have no idea what Id do. I imagine our scouts have Downs higher on the board and although they'd struggle for a consensus I think we'd ultimately take Downs.
BainCertainly possible both of these guys could be there at 12. If you stick and pick, who do you take?? I keep going back and forth. Downs is probably higher on our board but damn Bain is a beast.
