Baltimore Ravens Linebacker Kyle Van Noy Grills NFL For Baffling Decision To Bail Out Dak Prescott

[Kevinicus]

It wasn't intentional grounding. It was an illegal touch. Still not a safety since Dak's knees were still off the ground when he shovel passed (a PASS) the football forward and into the playing field.

The only thing you got right was how the ball should have been placed at the 4 yard line, instead of the 7, but I'm not arguing that at all. I'm stating FACTS......that was not a safety! The referees agreed. The review crew upstairs didn't even review it because they agreed. The Ravens didn't dispute the call because even they realized it was not a safety.

How was it not intentional grounding as well? The rule has been posted and explained numerous times here. Nothing you have said would mean it was not intentional grounding.

The only thing factual you have stated is that it was a pass...a REQUIREMENT for intentional grounding. You don't even realize what you're arguing. You're so far away from understanding the rules.

The review crew upstairs didn't review it because...it had to be a coaches challenge. A coach cannot challenge intentional grounding. Learn the rules, please.

The Ravens did dispute it. What are you talking about?

So, on one hand, you state "they're professionals" and they can't be challenged or possibly incorrect, but then at the same time admit they botched the spotting of the ball.

Can anyone make this poster make sense?

 

[sandbridge77]

How was it not intentional grounding as well? The rule has been posted and explained numerous times here. Nothing you have said would mean it was not intentional grounding.

The only thing factual you have stated is that it was a pass...a REQUIREMENT for intentional grounding. You don't even realize what you're arguing. You're so far away from understanding the rules.

The review crew upstairs didn't review it because...it had to be a coaches challenge. A coach cannot challenge intentional grounding. Learn the rules, please.

The Ravens did dispute it. What are you talking about?

So, on one hand, you state "they're professionals" and they can't be challenged or possibly incorrect, but then at the same time admit they botched the spotting of the ball.

Can anyone make this poster make sense?

No his defense of Dak gets in the way

 

[Kevinicus]

No his defense of Dak gets in the way

Probably. Which also makes no sense in this case.

It's not like the alternative of being sacked and also being a safety is any better than the intentional grounding that should have been called by the refs.

If Dak had thrown it and it got picked off by a defensive lineman or something, I could understand the urge to try and defend Dak, but stubbornly defending the refs in this case is not a defense of Dak. There's nothing to defend him from on this play.

Of course, he thinks making the argument that it was a pass somehow means it wasn't intentional grounding, so I guess I'm the fool for expecting rational reasoned thought.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Dak was bailed out of a safety and an interception. His stats are not indicative of his play…as usual.

its a sad day, when our own fans have to shiet on our own players out of despite....no wonder SA called us the worst fans in any sport.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Your logical fallacies don't change the fact that you and your professionals are wrong.

Can you answer the questions?

so you are right. but professionals who get paid to this are wrong. AWSOME. now we have come full circle.

 

[Kevinicus]

so you are right. but professionals who get paid to this are wrong. AWSOME. now we have come full circle.

Look everyone, AC's alternate account has chimed in with the same nonsense.

Yes, they are wrong. It's been proven using the facts of the play and what the rules are.

They are human, they make mistakes. Everyone knows they make mistakes.

Just like they messed up the spot as well on the same play.

 

[diamonddelts]

Always bet on Dak.

 

[blueblood70]

ball was out. Either that call or incomplete.

100

 

[blueblood70]

Baltimore Ravens Linebacker Kyle Van Noy Grills NFL For Baffling Decision To Bail Out Dak Prescott
by Grayson Weir
Sep 23, 2024

Baltimore Ravens linebacker Kyle Van Noy is just as confused as everybody else about a confusing call during the first half Sunday’s NFL game against the Dallas Cowboys. Don’t be surprised if the National Football league administers a fine for his criticism of the officials, even though it is completely warranted.

A play that probably should’ve been called as a safety was instead presented as a less-destructive penalty and gave the home team a break.

https://brobible.com/sports/article/dak-prescott-safety-penalty-ravens-kyle-van-noy-grounding/

so where was all this energy for the seven missed calls in the saints game!! right only when it may have helped us..lmao umm OK NIOT!!!! ef that noise!

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Look everyone, AC's alternate account has chimed in with the same nonsense.

Yes, they are wrong. It's been proven using the facts of the play and what the rules are.

They are human, they make mistakes. Everyone knows they make mistakes.

Just like they messed up the spot as well on the same play.

and so what!? what's the point of your argument. lets just say yes it was a saftey and we got lucky? are you complaining about what?

 

[Kevinicus]

and so what!? what's the point of your argument. lets just say yes it was a saftey and we got lucky? are you complaining about what?

I never complained.

This is a discussion about the play and what the refs called.

If you don't want to discuss it, there are plenty of other threads about other topics, and you can create your own too.

This is a football forum in case you weren't aware. Different aspects of football will be discussed here. One of which is officiating.

 

[America's Cowboy]

How was it not intentional grounding as well? The rule has been posted and explained numerous times here. Nothing you have said would mean it was not intentional grounding.

The only thing factual you have stated is that it was a pass...a REQUIREMENT for intentional grounding. You don't even realize what you're arguing. You're so far away from understanding the rules.

The review crew upstairs didn't review it because...it had to be a coaches challenge. A coach cannot challenge intentional grounding. Learn the rules, please.

The Ravens did dispute it. What are you talking about?

So, on one hand, you state "they're professionals" and they can't be challenged or possibly incorrect, but then at the same time admit they botched the spotting of the ball.

Can anyone make this poster make sense?

Let me put it in capital letters so you can understand...

INTENTIONAL GROUNDING ONLY HAPPENS IF THE FOOTBALL IS NOT TOUCHED BY ANOTHER PLAYER AFTER THE QB HAS THROWN IT FORWARD!!!!!!!!!

Understand?

 

[America's Cowboy]

so where was all this energy for the seven missed calls in the saints game!! right only when it may have helped us..lmao umm OK NIOT!!!! ef that noise!

They are just hating on Dak!!!!!

That's all they do around here, even when they are wrong.

 

[zrinkill]

Here's what it looks lile when correcrly called...

/thread

The refs got it wrong.

 

[Kevinicus]

Let me put it in capital letters so you can understand...

INTENTIONAL GROUNDING ONLY HAPPENS IF THE FOOTBALL IS NOT TOUCHED BY ANOTHER PLAYER AFTER THE QB HAS THROWN IT FORWARD!!!!!!!!!

Understand?

Thanks for stating your thoughts clearly.

You're very very wrong, though. It can be tocuhed by an ineligible player. It can be intercepted. Anything but near an eligible offensive receiver.

Source: The rule.

 

[Kevinicus]

They are just hating on Dak!!!!!

That's all they do around here, even when they are wrong.

What distorted reality do you live in where this has anything to do with Dak?

Nobody is hating on him. They're criticizing the officials.

This obsession you have is not healthy.

 

[cowboys5xsbs]

Cry more