Barber should be in the probowl

[DawnOfANewD]

Perhaps just to get him in there, Barber would be selected as a FB.

 

[03EBZ06]

Perhaps just to get him in there, Barber would be selected as a FB.

I don't see it happening. If selected, he'll go as third RB, not as a FB.

 

[Da Hammer]

Barber will make it because not only is he a great player but i believe almost all players and coaches respect him around the league. not to forget fan support by cowboys fans everywhere

 

[pugilist]

Ratliff will never make the Pro Bowl, and he shouldn't...

sig'd for future ownage

 

[AmericasTeam31]

AD and it's not even close. JJ was a horrible example cause he didn't accomplish anything during his rookie year close to what AD has done so far, and he still has 3 games left. Not to mention how many games has AD won for the Vikes despite the team being out matched? How many games has Barber won foe us (not good games, but games were he dominated)? Put it this way, if we had AD, we would be favorites over NE in the SB.

How quickly we forget? I guess 3tds out of 4 isn't dominating? I guess 6.1yds per touch isn't dominating? It all adds up to 104 total yards and 3 tds! And it was just this week.

But you don't make any mention of the 100yd game against the Bears, or the pounding he gave the Vikings "tough" run defense... They both came at times when we were trying to run time off the clock and they knew he was getting it... Yet, he still got the job done and secured the win.... I guess we don't need that though.... Wait 'til next year when you will all be talking about the sophmore slumps and his oline gets beat up a little.... It happens all the time.

 

[HogsRLegends]

no F-bomb?

No-that's reserved for games where our arch-rivals win that they have no business winning in the final seconds.

 

[WoodysGirl]

No-that's reserved for games where our arch-rivals win that they have no business winning in the final seconds.

Then it should be reserved on messageboards where such things are acceptable when discussing arch rivals winning games that "have no business winning in the final seconds."

 

[gbrittain]

No-that's reserved for games where our arch-rivals win that they have no business winning in the final seconds.

I think you meant to say "no business losing", because anything else makes zero sense.

 

[Danny White]

No-that's reserved for games where our arch-rivals win that they have no business winning in the final seconds.

Do you ever make sense?