CouchCoach
Staff member
- Messages
- 41,122
- Reaction score
- 74,964
This song is pure Stones to me and recaptured their earlier tunes. They could do this style better than any band I have heard.
This was my first Stones song that hooked me forever. This was the only song on the album that they wrote, the rest were covers.
In person? No, never. In fact, the only live performances I've ever seen on TV were the early days, before they started to get psychedelic and experimental.
Oh, but if you're asking because of what I said about Jagger's stage presence, I'd rather they just stand around singing, and concentrating on the music, than dancing badly and making faces.
The Beatles early stuff I could do without, but once they got into the psychedelic and experimental stuff, I love it.
How odd. Sympathy for the Devil is playing on my radio right now.I love the Beatles. But that doesn't mean I hate the Stones. Sympathy for the Devil could be my all time favorite song. It's brilliant!! Both bands are iconic and stood the test of time. And that's pretty amazing for the Beatles since they broke up in 1969. For a band that was together roughly 7 years they made quite a lasting impression and put out a serious catalog that's still very relevant 49 years later. The Stones on the other hand started at the same time and are still going. Also amazing and impressive!
How odd. Sympathy for the Devil is playing on my radio right now.
They're not all hard rock, no...but almost all are very well written and often deep.I'm now wondering if The Beatles would have stayed together and Lennon would have lived, would The Beattles have become more of a rockin style band. Problem i have with The Beatles is some of their music has such a sleepy effect to it. I feel like i'm struggling to get through some of these songs.