Considering past transgressions I think that draft picks almost have to be in the fold. Cheating in the past (and accusations of such for other instances) has to be taken into consideration just as it is for a repeat offender of PEDs, or DUI, or domestic violence rules. A pattern has been established, at this point, and must be taken into consideration (IMHO).
Many people are looking at this as an isolated incident and that's a mistake. Others are taking the "everybody does it" stance and that's also a mistake. It's a clear violation of the rule. It was an intended violation of the rule (if it wasn't the Colt's balls would have been at a similar PSI. The weather excuse is as flawed as it could possibly be). The killer there is intent. It doesn't matter if it was a wink wink deal between Brady and the equipment manager or if Bill was a knowing accomplice (I believe he was and he has been in the past on this exact same issue, they were just never called on it until now). The fact of the matter is there was an intended manipulation of the ball just as a pitcher in baseball would do (for which he would be subsequently be ejected, fined, and possibly suspended).
The ONLY deterrent to the PATS organization to stop stomping their foot across the line of league rules is to start increasing the punishment for continuing to thumb their nose at the NFL and the other 31 teams through manipulating and flat out breaking league rules to gain a competitive advantage. That's exactly what this "minor infraction" (as some have defended it) is all about. A competitive advantage that was a clear violation of stated NFL rules, conceived and implemented by the New England Patriots. Monetary fines are not a deterrent to a billion dollar football organization. When an organization cheats to gain a competitive advantage the punishment must mitigate (to an extent) their ability to compete either through suspensions, draft picks, or both, IMHO.